Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PRSO vs SIMO vs MRVL vs SMTC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
PRSO vs SIMO vs MRVL vs SMTC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $7M | $2.04B | $138.57B | $11.21B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13M | $886M | $8.19B | $1.03B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5M | $123M | $2.67B | $29M |
| Gross Margin | 58.8% | 48.3% | 51.0% | 52.0% |
| Operating Margin | -39.3% | 10.5% | 16.1% | 12.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 29.9x | 41.7x | 71.7x |
| Total Debt | $321K | $0.00 | $4.47B | $552M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $202M | $2.64B | $152M |
PRSO vs SIMO vs MRVL vs SMTC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peraso Inc. (PRSO) | 100 | 1.6 | -98.4% |
| Silicon Motion Tech… (SIMO) | 100 | 538.5 | +438.5% |
| Marvell Technology,… (MRVL) | 100 | 490.5 | +390.5% |
| Semtech Corporation (SMTC) | 100 | 228.5 | +128.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PRSO vs SIMO vs MRVL vs SMTC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PRSO is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.11, Low D/E 9.3%, current ratio 1.80x
- Beta 1.11 vs SMTC's 2.73, lower leverage
SIMO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.90, yield 3.3%
- Beta 1.90, yield 3.3%, current ratio 2.79x
- Lower P/E (29.9x vs 71.7x)
- 3.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs MRVL's 0.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
MRVL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 42.1%, EPS growth 401.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.4%
- 15.8% 10Y total return vs SIMO's 5.3%
- 42.1% revenue growth vs SMTC's 4.7%
- 32.6% margin vs PRSO's -39.0%
SMTC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 42.1% revenue growth vs SMTC's 4.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (29.9x vs 71.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 32.6% margin vs PRSO's -39.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.11 vs SMTC's 2.73, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs MRVL's 0.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +359.6% vs PRSO's +6.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.6% ROA vs PRSO's -78.9%, ROIC 6.0% vs -5.1% |
PRSO vs SIMO vs MRVL vs SMTC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PRSO vs SIMO vs MRVL vs SMTC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SIMO leads in 2 of 6 categories
MRVL leads 1 • PRSO leads 0 • SMTC leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MRVL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MRVL is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.2B annually — 630.3x PRSO's $13M. MRVL is the more profitable business, keeping 32.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRSO's -39.0%. On growth, SIMO holds the edge at +45.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13M | $886M | $8.2B | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | $123M | $2.3B | $173M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5M | $123M | $2.7B | $29M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | $6M | $1.4B | $143M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.8% | +48.3% | +51.0% | +52.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -39.3% | +10.5% | +16.1% | +12.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -39.0% | +13.8% | +32.6% | +2.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -40.9% | +0.7% | +17.0% | +13.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.8% | +45.7% | +22.1% | +12.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +82.7% | +7.4% | +100.0% | +67.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PRSO and SIMO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.6x trailing earnings, SIMO trades at a 68% valuation discount to MRVL's 52.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SIMO's 14.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MRVL's 106.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $2.0B | $138.6B | $11.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4M | $1.8B | $140.4B | $11.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.26x | 16.62x | 52.12x | -53.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 29.86x | 41.72x | 71.68x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.37x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 14.90x | 106.14x | 104.59x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.49x | 2.30x | 16.91x | 12.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.82x | 2.45x | 9.73x | 16.04x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 324.67x | 99.24x | 256.13x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SIMO and MRVL each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MRVL delivers a 19.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-149 for PRSO. PRSO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SMTC's 1.02x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MRVL scores 7/9 vs SIMO's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -148.6% | +15.2% | +19.4% | +5.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -78.9% | +11.2% | +12.6% | +2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.1% | +12.4% | +6.0% | +4.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.5% | +10.8% | +7.1% | +5.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | — | 0.31x | 1.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | -$202M | $1.8B | $400M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $202M | $2.6B | $152M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $321,000 | $0 | $4.5B | $552M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1243.50x | — | 15.17x | 2.45x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SIMO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SIMO five years ago would be worth $36,741 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $72 for PRSO. Over the past 12 months, SIMO leads with a +359.6% total return vs PRSO's +6.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SMTC at 86.4% vs PRSO's -60.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.7% | +159.9% | +79.1% | +61.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +6.0% | +359.6% | +184.6% | +253.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.8% | +311.9% | +291.9% | +547.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.3% | +267.4% | +250.8% | +89.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +533.8% | +1581.3% | +460.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -60.4% | +60.3% | +57.7% | +86.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PRSO and SIMO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PRSO is the less volatile stock with a 1.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SMTC's 2.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SIMO currently trades 96.4% from its 52-week high vs PRSO's 39.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.11x | 1.90x | 2.21x | 2.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.37 | $251.71 | $175.79 | $127.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.77 | $52.01 | $53.78 | $33.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +39.7% | +96.4% | +91.0% | +95.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.6 | 85.8 | 78.5 | 69.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9.1M | 743K | 24.8M | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
SIMO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SIMO as "Buy", MRVL as "Buy", SMTC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 3.5% upside for SIMO (target: $251) vs -28.0% for SMTC (target: $87). For income investors, SIMO offers the higher dividend yield at 3.30% vs MRVL's 0.15%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $251.25 | $129.52 | $87.44 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 31 | 72 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.3% | +0.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $8.00 | $0.24 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.2% | +1.5% | 0.0% |
SIMO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). MRVL leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 3 tied.
PRSO vs SIMO vs MRVL vs SMTC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PRSO or SIMO or MRVL or SMTC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Marvell Technology, Inc.
(MRVL) is the stronger pick with 42. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 7% for Semtech Corporation (SMTC). Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) offers the better valuation at 16. 6x trailing P/E (29. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PRSO or SIMO or MRVL or SMTC?
On trailing P/E, Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) is the cheapest at 16.
6x versus Marvell Technology, Inc. at 52. 1x. On forward P/E, Silicon Motion Technology Corporation is actually cheaper at 29. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PRSO or SIMO or MRVL or SMTC?
Over the past 5 years, Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) delivered a total return of +267.
4%, compared to -99. 3% for Peraso Inc. (PRSO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MRVL returned +1581% versus PRSO's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PRSO or SIMO or MRVL or SMTC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Peraso Inc.
(PRSO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 11β versus Semtech Corporation's 2. 73β — meaning SMTC is approximately 147% more volatile than PRSO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Peraso Inc. (PRSO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 102% for Semtech Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PRSO or SIMO or MRVL or SMTC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Marvell Technology, Inc.
(MRVL) is pulling ahead at 42. 1% versus 4. 7% for Semtech Corporation (SMTC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Marvell Technology, Inc. grew EPS 401. 0% year-over-year, compared to 38. 3% for Silicon Motion Technology Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, PRSO leads at 36. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PRSO or SIMO or MRVL or SMTC?
Marvell Technology, Inc.
(MRVL) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 6% net margin versus -73. 6% for Peraso Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MRVL leads at 16. 1% versus -85. 3% for PRSO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRSO leads at 51. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PRSO or SIMO or MRVL or SMTC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) trades at 29.
9x forward P/E versus 71. 7x for Semtech Corporation — 41. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SIMO: 3. 5% to $251. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — PRSO or SIMO or MRVL or SMTC?
In this comparison, SIMO (3.
3% yield), MRVL (0. 1% yield) pay a dividend. PRSO, SMTC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PRSO or SIMO or MRVL or SMTC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Marvell Technology, Inc.
(MRVL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1581% 10Y return). Semtech Corporation (SMTC) carries a higher beta of 2. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MRVL: +1581%, SMTC: +460. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PRSO and SIMO and MRVL and SMTC?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PRSO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SIMO is a small-cap deep-value stock; MRVL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SMTC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. SIMO pays a dividend while PRSO, MRVL, SMTC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.