Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PRTC vs CMPS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Care Facilities
PRTC vs CMPS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Medical - Care Facilities |
| Market Cap | $41M | $902M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-56M | $-288M |
| Gross Margin | -196.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | -26.2% | — |
| Total Debt | $20M | $21M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $254M | $150M |
PRTC vs CMPS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PureTech Health plc (PRTC) | 100 | 42.5 | -57.5% |
| COMPASS Pathways plc (CMPS) | 100 | 18.8 | -81.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PRTC vs CMPS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PRTC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.51
- -55.9% 10Y total return vs CMPS's -67.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.51, Low D/E 6.5%, current ratio 6.59x
CMPS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- EPS growth -33.9%
- 1.3% margin vs PRTC's -6.2%
- +151.1% vs PRTC's -2.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -3.5% revenue growth vs CMPS's -85.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.3% margin vs PRTC's -6.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.51 vs CMPS's 1.33 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +151.1% vs PRTC's -2.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -9.9% ROA vs CMPS's -106.8% |
PRTC vs CMPS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CMPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRTC and CMPS operate at a comparable scale, with $9M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$228M | -$179M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$56M | -$288M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$219M | -$157M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -196.2% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -26.2% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.2% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -24.4% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -30.5% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.7% | -58.7% |
Valuation Metrics
CMPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $41M | $902M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$193M | $774M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.37x | -3.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.79x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.13x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
PRTC leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PRTC delivers a -16.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-16 in annual profit, vs $-3 for CMPS. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PRTC scores 5/9 vs CMPS's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -16.1% | -3.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.9% | -106.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -66.9% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -18.8% | -2.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$234M | -$129M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $254M | $150M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $20M | $21M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.16x | -52.40x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CMPS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PRTC five years ago would be worth $2,988 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,756 for CMPS. Over the past 12 months, CMPS leads with a +151.1% total return vs PRTC's -2.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CMPS at 3.5% vs PRTC's -16.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.0% | +43.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -2.6% | +151.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.3% | +11.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.1% | -72.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.9% | -67.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.3% | +3.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PRTC and CMPS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PRTC is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CMPS's 1.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CMPS currently trades 92.0% from its 52-week high vs PRTC's 85.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.51x | 1.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.92 | $10.21 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.50 | $2.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.2% | +92.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.2 | 68.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8K | 3.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PRTC as "Buy" and CMPS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 235.9% upside for PRTC (target: $57) vs 89.9% for CMPS (target: $18).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $57.00 | $17.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.0% | 0.0% |
CMPS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PRTC leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
PRTC vs CMPS: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PRTC or CMPS a better buy right now?
Analysts rate PureTech Health plc (PRTC) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison.
The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PRTC or CMPS?
Over the past 5 years, PureTech Health plc (PRTC) delivered a total return of -70.
1%, compared to -72. 4% for COMPASS Pathways plc (CMPS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PRTC returned -55. 9% versus CMPS's -67. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PRTC or CMPS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PureTech Health plc (PRTC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
51β versus COMPASS Pathways plc's 1. 33β — meaning CMPS is approximately 162% more volatile than PRTC relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — PRTC or CMPS?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: COMPASS Pathways plc grew EPS -33.
9% year-over-year, compared to -24. 0% for PureTech Health plc. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — PRTC or CMPS?
COMPASS Pathways plc (CMPS) is the more profitable company, earning 0.
0% net margin versus -23. 6% for PureTech Health plc — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CMPS leads at 0. 0% versus -21. 1% for PRTC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRTC leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — PRTC or CMPS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is PRTC or CMPS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PureTech Health plc (PRTC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
51)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PRTC: -55. 9%, CMPS: -67. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between PRTC and CMPS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.