Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PRVA vs OSCR vs CNC vs ALHC

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PRVA
Privia Health Group, Inc.

Medical - Healthcare Information Services

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.01B
5Y Perf.-33.9%
OSCR
Oscar Health, Inc.

Medical - Healthcare Plans

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.41B
5Y Perf.-8.2%
CNC
Centene Corporation

Medical - Healthcare Plans

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$27.13B
5Y Perf.-11.0%
ALHC
Alignment Healthcare, Inc.

Medical - Healthcare Plans

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.73B
5Y Perf.-31.2%

PRVA vs OSCR vs CNC vs ALHC — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PRVA logoPRVA
OSCR logoOSCR
CNC logoCNC
ALHC logoALHC
IndustryMedical - Healthcare Information ServicesMedical - Healthcare PlansMedical - Healthcare PlansMedical - Healthcare Plans
Market Cap$3.01B$5.41B$27.13B$3.73B
Revenue (TTM)$2.25B$13.30B$198.10B$4.26B
Net Income (TTM)$3.08B$-39M$-6.44B$20M
Gross Margin7.0%17.4%14.9%9.0%
Operating Margin1.6%0.1%-3.7%0.8%
Forward P/E68.5x34.7x16.3x140.9x
Total Debt$10M$430M$18.78B$338M
Cash & Equiv.$480M$2.77B$17.89B$578M

PRVA vs OSCR vs CNC vs ALHCLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PRVA
OSCR
CNC
ALHC
StockApr 21May 26Return
Privia Health Group… (PRVA)10066.1-33.9%
Oscar Health, Inc. (OSCR)10091.8-8.2%
Centene Corporation (CNC)10089.0-11.0%
Alignment Healthcar… (ALHC)10068.8-31.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PRVA vs OSCR vs CNC vs ALHC

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CNC and ALHC are tied at the top with 2 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Alignment Healthcare, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and operational efficiency and capital deployment. PRVA and OSCR also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
PRVA
Privia Health Group, Inc.
The Quality Compounder

PRVA is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.

  • 137.2% margin vs CNC's -3.3%
Best for: quality
OSCR
Oscar Health, Inc.
The Insurance Pick

OSCR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +22.6% vs CNC's -12.7%
Best for: momentum
CNC
Centene Corporation
The Insurance Pick

CNC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.39
  • 81.2% 10Y total return vs ALHC's 5.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 93.6%, current ratio 1.68x
  • Beta 0.39, current ratio 1.68x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
ALHC
Alignment Healthcare, Inc.
The Insurance Pick

ALHC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 46.1%, EPS growth 99.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 40.2%
  • 46.1% revenue growth vs CNC's 19.4%
  • 1.8% ROA vs CNC's -7.9%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthALHC logoALHC46.1% revenue growth vs CNC's 19.4%
ValueCNC logoCNCLower P/E (16.3x vs 140.9x)
Quality / MarginsPRVA logoPRVA137.2% margin vs CNC's -3.3%
Stability / SafetyCNC logoCNCBeta 0.39 vs OSCR's 1.84
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)OSCR logoOSCR+22.6% vs CNC's -12.7%
Efficiency (ROA)ALHC logoALHC1.8% ROA vs CNC's -7.9%

PRVA vs OSCR vs CNC vs ALHC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PRVAPrivia Health Group, Inc.
FY 2025
FFS-Patient Care
64.1%$1.4B
Capitated Revenue
14.5%$308M
Shared Savings
11.1%$235M
FFS-Administrative Services
6.5%$137M
Care Management Fee (PMPM)
3.4%$73M
Other Revenue
0.4%$9M
OSCROscar Health, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

CNCCentene Corporation
FY 2025
Medicaid Segment
75.8%$147.6B
Commercial Segment
21.6%$42.0B
Other Operating Segment
2.6%$5.1B
ALHCAlignment Healthcare, Inc.
FY 2023
Health Care, Premium
92.6%$1.7B
Health Care Capitation
7.4%$133M

PRVA vs OSCR vs CNC vs ALHC — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLOSCRLAGGINGALHC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

OSCR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

CNC is the larger business by revenue, generating $198.1B annually — 88.2x PRVA's $2.2B. PRVA is the more profitable business, keeping 137.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CNC's -3.3%. On growth, OSCR holds the edge at +52.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricPRVA logoPRVAPrivia Health Gro…OSCR logoOSCROscar Health, Inc.CNC logoCNCCentene Corporati…ALHC logoALHCAlignment Healthc…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2.2B$13.3B$198.1B$4.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$48M$40M-$5.9B$66M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$3.1B-$39M-$6.4B$20M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$49.3B$2.8B$6.3B$237M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+7.0%+17.4%+14.9%+9.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+1.6%+0.1%-3.7%+0.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+137.2%-0.3%-3.3%+0.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-21.9%+21.0%+3.2%+5.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+25.8%+52.6%+7.1%+33.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-33.3%+125.0%+18.3%+2.1%
OSCR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CNC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, PRVA's 57.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALHC's 77.1x.

MetricPRVA logoPRVAPrivia Health Gro…OSCR logoOSCROscar Health, Inc.CNC logoCNCCentene Corporati…ALHC logoALHCAlignment Healthc…
Market CapShares × price$3.0B$5.4B$27.1B$3.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2.5B$3.1B$28.0B$3.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS133.28x-12.35x-4.03x-4932.43x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.68.48x34.65x16.29x140.93x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple57.62x77.12x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.42x0.46x0.14x0.94x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.91x5.58x1.35x20.16x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF18.58x5.11x6.28x32.95x
CNC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — PRVA and ALHC each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

ALHC delivers a 11.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-29 for CNC. PRVA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALHC's 1.89x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CNC scores 6/9 vs OSCR's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricPRVA logoPRVAPrivia Health Gro…OSCR logoOSCROscar Health, Inc.CNC logoCNCCentene Corporati…ALHC logoALHCAlignment Healthc…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+1.5%-3.3%-28.6%+11.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.9%-0.6%-7.9%+1.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+9.9%-21.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+4.6%-25.3%-14.6%+2.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–95466
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.44x0.94x1.89x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$470M-$2.3B$889M-$240M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$480M$2.8B$17.9B$578M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$10M$430M$18.8B$338M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-0.57x-9.03x1.27x
Evenly matched — PRVA and ALHC each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

OSCR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in OSCR five years ago would be worth $9,271 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,388 for PRVA. Over the past 12 months, OSCR leads with a +22.6% total return vs CNC's -12.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OSCR at 40.5% vs PRVA's -7.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPRVA logoPRVAPrivia Health Gro…OSCR logoOSCROscar Health, Inc.CNC logoCNCCentene Corporati…ALHC logoALHCAlignment Healthc…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+2.3%+39.4%+31.5%-9.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+2.9%+22.6%-12.7%+17.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-19.8%+177.5%-19.5%+152.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-26.1%-7.3%-22.0%-22.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+4.3%-40.0%+81.2%+5.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-7.1%+40.5%-7.0%+36.2%
OSCR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — PRVA and CNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CNC is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OSCR's 1.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRVA currently trades 90.5% from its 52-week high vs ALHC's 76.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPRVA logoPRVAPrivia Health Gro…OSCR logoOSCROscar Health, Inc.CNC logoCNCCentene Corporati…ALHC logoALHCAlignment Healthc…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.03x1.84x0.39x0.75x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$26.51$23.80$64.15$23.87
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$18.77$10.69$25.08$11.63
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+90.5%+87.7%+85.7%+76.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10055.678.583.537.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded901K6.5M5.8M3.6M
Evenly matched — PRVA and CNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: PRVA as "Buy", OSCR as "Hold", CNC as "Buy", ALHC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 36.1% upside for ALHC (target: $25) vs -19.7% for OSCR (target: $17).

MetricPRVA logoPRVAPrivia Health Gro…OSCR logoOSCROscar Health, Inc.CNC logoCNCCentene Corporati…ALHC logoALHCAlignment Healthc…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$31.67$16.75$51.00$24.83
# AnalystsCovering analysts22114316
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+1.8%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

OSCR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). CNC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallOscar Health, Inc. (OSCR)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PRVA vs OSCR vs CNC vs ALHC: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PRVA or OSCR or CNC or ALHC a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Alignment Healthcare, Inc.

(ALHC) is the stronger pick with 46. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 19. 4% for Centene Corporation (CNC). Privia Health Group, Inc. (PRVA) offers the better valuation at 133. 3x trailing P/E (68. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Privia Health Group, Inc. (PRVA) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PRVA or OSCR or CNC or ALHC?

On forward P/E, Centene Corporation is actually cheaper at 16.

3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PRVA or OSCR or CNC or ALHC?

Over the past 5 years, Oscar Health, Inc.

(OSCR) delivered a total return of -7. 3%, compared to -26. 1% for Privia Health Group, Inc. (PRVA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CNC returned +81. 2% versus OSCR's -40. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PRVA or OSCR or CNC or ALHC?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Centene Corporation (CNC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

39β versus Oscar Health, Inc. 's 1. 84β — meaning OSCR is approximately 369% more volatile than CNC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Privia Health Group, Inc. (PRVA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 189% for Alignment Healthcare, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PRVA or OSCR or CNC or ALHC?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alignment Healthcare, Inc.

(ALHC) is pulling ahead at 46. 1% versus 19. 4% for Centene Corporation (CNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alignment Healthcare, Inc. grew EPS 99. 4% year-over-year, compared to -1865. 9% for Oscar Health, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OSCR leads at 41. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PRVA or OSCR or CNC or ALHC?

Privia Health Group, Inc.

(PRVA) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 1% net margin versus -3. 8% for Oscar Health, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRVA leads at 1. 6% versus -3. 9% for CNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OSCR leads at 14. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PRVA or OSCR or CNC or ALHC more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Centene Corporation (CNC) trades at 16.

3x forward P/E versus 140. 9x for Alignment Healthcare, Inc. — 124. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALHC: 36. 1% to $24. 83.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PRVA or OSCR or CNC or ALHC?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is PRVA or OSCR or CNC or ALHC better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Centene Corporation (CNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

39)). Oscar Health, Inc. (OSCR) carries a higher beta of 1. 84 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CNC: +81. 2%, OSCR: -40. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PRVA and OSCR and CNC and ALHC?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

PRVA

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 12%
  • Net Margin > 82%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

OSCR

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 26%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CNC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ALHC

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 16%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform PRVA and OSCR and CNC and ALHC on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(PRVA: 25.8% · OSCR: 52.6%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.