Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PSIX vs GNRC vs HUBB vs HLIO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PSIX
Power Solutions International, Inc.

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.66B
5Y Perf.+1399.8%
GNRC
Generac Holdings Inc.

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$15.65B
5Y Perf.+139.8%
HUBB
Hubbell Incorporated

Electrical Equipment & Parts

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$26.21B
5Y Perf.+302.8%
HLIO
Helios Technologies, Inc.

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.25B
5Y Perf.+90.1%

PSIX vs GNRC vs HUBB vs HLIO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PSIX logoPSIX
GNRC logoGNRC
HUBB logoHUBB
HLIO logoHLIO
IndustryIndustrial - MachineryIndustrial - MachineryElectrical Equipment & PartsIndustrial - Machinery
Market Cap$1.66B$15.65B$26.21B$2.25B
Revenue (TTM)$531M$4.33B$6.00B$839M
Net Income (TTM)$114M$189M$906M$49M
Gross Margin34.8%38.1%35.5%32.3%
Operating Margin20.7%7.5%20.8%7.8%
Forward P/E15.1x30.9x25.0x26.9x
Total Debt$152M$1.33B$2.61B$111M
Cash & Equiv.$41M$341M$483M$73M

PSIX vs GNRC vs HUBB vs HLIOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PSIX
GNRC
HUBB
HLIO
StockMay 20May 26Return
Power Solutions Int… (PSIX)1001499.8+1399.8%
Generac Holdings In… (GNRC)100239.8+139.8%
Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB)100402.8+302.8%
Helios Technologies… (HLIO)100190.1+90.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PSIX vs GNRC vs HUBB vs HLIO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: PSIX leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. Hubbell Incorporated is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. HLIO also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
PSIX
Power Solutions International, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

PSIX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.

  • 5.6% 10Y total return vs GNRC's 6.7%
  • 21.5% margin vs GNRC's 4.4%
  • +178.6% vs HUBB's +41.5%
  • 26.9% ROA vs HLIO's 3.1%, ROIC 36.9% vs 4.4%
Best for: long-term compounding
GNRC
Generac Holdings Inc.
The Secondary Option

GNRC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: industrials exposure
HUBB
Hubbell Incorporated
The Income Pick

HUBB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.38, yield 1.1%
  • Beta 1.38, yield 1.1%, current ratio 1.72x
  • Beta 1.38 vs PSIX's 3.33, lower leverage
  • 1.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs HLIO's 0.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
HLIO
Helios Technologies, Inc.
The Growth Play

HLIO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 4.1%, EPS growth 23.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.56, Low D/E 11.9%, current ratio 2.90x
  • PEG 1.00 vs HUBB's 1.20
  • 4.1% revenue growth vs PSIX's -100.0%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHLIO logoHLIO4.1% revenue growth vs PSIX's -100.0%
ValueHLIO logoHLIOPEG 1.00 vs 1.20
Quality / MarginsPSIX logoPSIX21.5% margin vs GNRC's 4.4%
Stability / SafetyHUBB logoHUBBBeta 1.38 vs PSIX's 3.33, lower leverage
DividendsHUBB logoHUBB1.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs HLIO's 0.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)PSIX logoPSIX+178.6% vs HUBB's +41.5%
Efficiency (ROA)PSIX logoPSIX26.9% ROA vs HLIO's 3.1%, ROIC 36.9% vs 4.4%

PSIX vs GNRC vs HUBB vs HLIO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PSIXPower Solutions International, Inc.
FY 2025
Energy End Market
81.2%$586M
Industrial End Market
15.9%$115M
Transportation End Market
2.9%$21M
GNRCGenerac Holdings Inc.
FY 2025
Extended Warranties
100.0%$219M
HUBBHubbell Incorporated
FY 2025
Utility Solutions Segment
62.8%$3.7B
Electrical Segment
37.2%$2.2B
HLIOHelios Technologies, Inc.
FY 2025
Hydraulics
64.5%$541M
Electronics
35.5%$298M

PSIX vs GNRC vs HUBB vs HLIO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLPSIXLAGGINGHLIO

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — HUBB and HLIO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

HUBB is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.0B annually — 11.3x PSIX's $531M. PSIX is the more profitable business, keeping 21.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GNRC's 4.4%. On growth, HLIO holds the edge at +17.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricPSIX logoPSIXPower Solutions I…GNRC logoGNRCGenerac Holdings …HUBB logoHUBBHubbell Incorpora…HLIO logoHLIOHelios Technologi…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$531M$4.3B$6.0B$839M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$115M$472M$1.5B$129M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$114M$189M$906M$49M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$4M$419M$909M$103M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+34.8%+38.1%+35.5%+32.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+20.7%+7.5%+20.8%+7.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+21.5%+4.4%+15.1%+5.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+0.8%+9.7%+15.2%+12.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-100.0%+12.4%+11.1%+17.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-30.7%+69.9%+8.3%+3.1%
Evenly matched — HUBB and HLIO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — PSIX and HLIO each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 14.6x trailing earnings, PSIX trades at a 85% valuation discount to GNRC's 99.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HUBB offers better value at 1.43x vs HLIO's 1.74x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricPSIX logoPSIXPower Solutions I…GNRC logoGNRCGenerac Holdings …HUBB logoHUBBHubbell Incorpora…HLIO logoHLIOHelios Technologi…
Market CapShares × price$1.7B$15.7B$26.2B$2.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.8B$16.6B$28.3B$2.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS14.57x99.17x29.81x46.89x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.15.11x30.91x25.01x26.92x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.43x1.74x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple15.38x34.39x20.81x17.74x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.72x4.48x2.68x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share9.30x5.99x6.85x2.43x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF117.31x58.38x29.97x21.72x
Evenly matched — PSIX and HLIO each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — PSIX and HLIO each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

PSIX delivers a 81.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $81 in annual profit, vs $5 for HLIO. HLIO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PSIX's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HLIO scores 9/9 vs PSIX's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricPSIX logoPSIXPower Solutions I…GNRC logoGNRCGenerac Holdings …HUBB logoHUBBHubbell Incorpora…HLIO logoHLIOHelios Technologi…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+81.3%+7.2%+24.4%+5.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+26.9%+3.4%+11.6%+3.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+36.9%+5.9%+17.1%+4.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+50.7%+6.9%+20.1%+4.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–95679
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.85x0.51x0.68x0.12x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$111M$992M$2.1B$38M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$41M$341M$483M$73M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$152M$1.3B$2.6B$111M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense13.09x4.54x16.90x3.84x
Evenly matched — PSIX and HLIO each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PSIX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PSIX five years ago would be worth $118,016 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,149 for GNRC. Over the past 12 months, PSIX leads with a +178.6% total return vs HUBB's +41.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PSIX at 190.1% vs HLIO's 3.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPSIX logoPSIXPower Solutions I…GNRC logoGNRCGenerac Holdings …HUBB logoHUBBHubbell Incorpora…HLIO logoHLIOHelios Technologi…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+17.0%+89.1%+6.8%+24.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+178.6%+129.9%+41.5%+134.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+2340.3%+141.5%+87.9%+11.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1080.2%-18.5%+159.4%-8.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+559.3%+666.1%+410.7%+109.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+190.1%+34.2%+23.4%+3.6%
PSIX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — GNRC and HUBB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

HUBB is the less volatile stock with a 1.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PSIX's 3.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GNRC currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs PSIX's 59.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPSIX logoPSIXPower Solutions I…GNRC logoGNRCGenerac Holdings …HUBB logoHUBBHubbell Incorpora…HLIO logoHLIOHelios Technologi…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5003.33x1.69x1.38x1.56x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$121.78$269.58$565.50$76.47
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$25.09$113.96$349.40$28.34
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+59.1%+99.0%+87.2%+88.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10052.677.841.255.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded624K895K546K350K
Evenly matched — GNRC and HUBB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

HUBB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: PSIX as "Buy", GNRC as "Buy", HUBB as "Hold", HLIO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 44.8% upside for PSIX (target: $104) vs 1.7% for GNRC (target: $271). For income investors, HUBB offers the higher dividend yield at 1.09% vs HLIO's 0.53%.

MetricPSIX logoPSIXPower Solutions I…GNRC logoGNRCGenerac Holdings …HUBB logoHUBBHubbell Incorpora…HLIO logoHLIOHelios Technologi…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$104.26$271.22$535.14$77.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts6391712
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.0%+1.1%+0.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1121
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.00$5.35$0.36
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.9%+0.9%+0.6%
HUBB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

PSIX leads in 1 of 6 categories (Total Returns). HUBB leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 4 tied.

Best OverallPower Solutions Internation… (PSIX)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PSIX vs GNRC vs HUBB vs HLIO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PSIX or GNRC or HUBB or HLIO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Helios Technologies, Inc.

(HLIO) is the stronger pick with 4. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX). Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX) offers the better valuation at 14. 6x trailing P/E (15. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PSIX or GNRC or HUBB or HLIO?

On trailing P/E, Power Solutions International, Inc.

(PSIX) is the cheapest at 14. 6x versus Generac Holdings Inc. at 99. 2x. On forward P/E, Power Solutions International, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Helios Technologies, Inc. wins at 1. 00x versus Hubbell Incorporated's 1. 20x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PSIX or GNRC or HUBB or HLIO?

Over the past 5 years, Power Solutions International, Inc.

(PSIX) delivered a total return of +1080%, compared to -18. 5% for Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GNRC returned +666. 1% versus HLIO's +109. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PSIX or GNRC or HUBB or HLIO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

38β versus Power Solutions International, Inc. 's 3. 33β — meaning PSIX is approximately 142% more volatile than HUBB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Helios Technologies, Inc. (HLIO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 85% for Power Solutions International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PSIX or GNRC or HUBB or HLIO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Helios Technologies, Inc.

(HLIO) is pulling ahead at 4. 1% versus -100. 0% for Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Power Solutions International, Inc. grew EPS 64. 1% year-over-year, compared to -50. 1% for Generac Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HUBB leads at 5. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PSIX or GNRC or HUBB or HLIO?

Power Solutions International, Inc.

(PSIX) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 5% net margin versus 3. 8% for Generac Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HUBB leads at 20. 8% versus 6. 9% for GNRC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GNRC leads at 38. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PSIX or GNRC or HUBB or HLIO more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Helios Technologies, Inc. (HLIO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 00x versus Hubbell Incorporated's 1. 20x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX) trades at 15. 1x forward P/E versus 30. 9x for Generac Holdings Inc. — 15. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PSIX: 44. 8% to $104. 26.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PSIX or GNRC or HUBB or HLIO?

In this comparison, HUBB (1.

1% yield), HLIO (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. PSIX, GNRC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is PSIX or GNRC or HUBB or HLIO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.

1% yield, +410. 7% 10Y return). Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX) carries a higher beta of 3. 33 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HUBB: +410. 7%, PSIX: +559. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PSIX and GNRC and HUBB and HLIO?

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: PSIX is a small-cap deep-value stock; GNRC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; HUBB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; HLIO is a small-cap quality compounder stock. HUBB, HLIO pay a dividend while PSIX, GNRC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

PSIX

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GNRC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Gross Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HUBB

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HLIO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform PSIX and GNRC and HUBB and HLIO on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(PSIX: -100.0% · GNRC: 12.4%)
Net Margin>
%
(PSIX: 21.5% · GNRC: 4.4%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(PSIX: 14.6x · GNRC: 99.2x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.