Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PSIX vs GNRC vs HUBB vs HLIO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Industrial - Machinery
PSIX vs GNRC vs HUBB vs HLIO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $1.66B | $15.65B | $26.21B | $2.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $531M | $4.33B | $6.00B | $839M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $114M | $189M | $906M | $49M |
| Gross Margin | 34.8% | 38.1% | 35.5% | 32.3% |
| Operating Margin | 20.7% | 7.5% | 20.8% | 7.8% |
| Forward P/E | 15.1x | 30.9x | 25.0x | 26.9x |
| Total Debt | $152M | $1.33B | $2.61B | $111M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $41M | $341M | $483M | $73M |
PSIX vs GNRC vs HUBB vs HLIO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power Solutions Int… (PSIX) | 100 | 1499.8 | +1399.8% |
| Generac Holdings In… (GNRC) | 100 | 239.8 | +139.8% |
| Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) | 100 | 402.8 | +302.8% |
| Helios Technologies… (HLIO) | 100 | 190.1 | +90.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PSIX vs GNRC vs HUBB vs HLIO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PSIX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 5.6% 10Y total return vs GNRC's 6.7%
- 21.5% margin vs GNRC's 4.4%
- +178.6% vs HUBB's +41.5%
- 26.9% ROA vs HLIO's 3.1%, ROIC 36.9% vs 4.4%
GNRC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
HUBB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.38, yield 1.1%
- Beta 1.38, yield 1.1%, current ratio 1.72x
- Beta 1.38 vs PSIX's 3.33, lower leverage
- 1.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs HLIO's 0.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
HLIO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 4.1%, EPS growth 23.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.56, Low D/E 11.9%, current ratio 2.90x
- PEG 1.00 vs HUBB's 1.20
- 4.1% revenue growth vs PSIX's -100.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.1% revenue growth vs PSIX's -100.0% | |
| Value | PEG 1.00 vs 1.20 | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.5% margin vs GNRC's 4.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.38 vs PSIX's 3.33, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs HLIO's 0.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +178.6% vs HUBB's +41.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.9% ROA vs HLIO's 3.1%, ROIC 36.9% vs 4.4% |
PSIX vs GNRC vs HUBB vs HLIO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PSIX vs GNRC vs HUBB vs HLIO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PSIX leads in 1 of 6 categories
HUBB leads 1 • GNRC leads 0 • HLIO leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — HUBB and HLIO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HUBB is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.0B annually — 11.3x PSIX's $531M. PSIX is the more profitable business, keeping 21.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GNRC's 4.4%. On growth, HLIO holds the edge at +17.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $531M | $4.3B | $6.0B | $839M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $115M | $472M | $1.5B | $129M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $114M | $189M | $906M | $49M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4M | $419M | $909M | $103M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.8% | +38.1% | +35.5% | +32.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.7% | +7.5% | +20.8% | +7.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.5% | +4.4% | +15.1% | +5.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.8% | +9.7% | +15.2% | +12.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +12.4% | +11.1% | +17.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -30.7% | +69.9% | +8.3% | +3.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PSIX and HLIO each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.6x trailing earnings, PSIX trades at a 85% valuation discount to GNRC's 99.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HUBB offers better value at 1.43x vs HLIO's 1.74x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $15.7B | $26.2B | $2.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $16.6B | $28.3B | $2.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.57x | 99.17x | 29.81x | 46.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.11x | 30.91x | 25.01x | 26.92x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.43x | 1.74x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.38x | 34.39x | 20.81x | 17.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3.72x | 4.48x | 2.68x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.30x | 5.99x | 6.85x | 2.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 117.31x | 58.38x | 29.97x | 21.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — PSIX and HLIO each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PSIX delivers a 81.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $81 in annual profit, vs $5 for HLIO. HLIO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PSIX's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HLIO scores 9/9 vs PSIX's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +81.3% | +7.2% | +24.4% | +5.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +26.9% | +3.4% | +11.6% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +36.9% | +5.9% | +17.1% | +4.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +50.7% | +6.9% | +20.1% | +4.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.85x | 0.51x | 0.68x | 0.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $111M | $992M | $2.1B | $38M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $41M | $341M | $483M | $73M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $152M | $1.3B | $2.6B | $111M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 13.09x | 4.54x | 16.90x | 3.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PSIX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PSIX five years ago would be worth $118,016 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,149 for GNRC. Over the past 12 months, PSIX leads with a +178.6% total return vs HUBB's +41.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PSIX at 190.1% vs HLIO's 3.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.0% | +89.1% | +6.8% | +24.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +178.6% | +129.9% | +41.5% | +134.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2340.3% | +141.5% | +87.9% | +11.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1080.2% | -18.5% | +159.4% | -8.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +559.3% | +666.1% | +410.7% | +109.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +190.1% | +34.2% | +23.4% | +3.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GNRC and HUBB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HUBB is the less volatile stock with a 1.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PSIX's 3.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GNRC currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs PSIX's 59.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.33x | 1.69x | 1.38x | 1.56x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $121.78 | $269.58 | $565.50 | $76.47 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $25.09 | $113.96 | $349.40 | $28.34 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +59.1% | +99.0% | +87.2% | +88.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.6 | 77.8 | 41.2 | 55.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 624K | 895K | 546K | 350K |
Analyst Outlook
HUBB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PSIX as "Buy", GNRC as "Buy", HUBB as "Hold", HLIO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 44.8% upside for PSIX (target: $104) vs 1.7% for GNRC (target: $271). For income investors, HUBB offers the higher dividend yield at 1.09% vs HLIO's 0.53%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $104.26 | $271.22 | $535.14 | $77.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 39 | 17 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% | +1.1% | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 12 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.00 | $5.35 | $0.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.9% | +0.9% | +0.6% |
PSIX leads in 1 of 6 categories (Total Returns). HUBB leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 4 tied.
PSIX vs GNRC vs HUBB vs HLIO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PSIX or GNRC or HUBB or HLIO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Helios Technologies, Inc.
(HLIO) is the stronger pick with 4. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX). Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX) offers the better valuation at 14. 6x trailing P/E (15. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PSIX or GNRC or HUBB or HLIO?
On trailing P/E, Power Solutions International, Inc.
(PSIX) is the cheapest at 14. 6x versus Generac Holdings Inc. at 99. 2x. On forward P/E, Power Solutions International, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Helios Technologies, Inc. wins at 1. 00x versus Hubbell Incorporated's 1. 20x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PSIX or GNRC or HUBB or HLIO?
Over the past 5 years, Power Solutions International, Inc.
(PSIX) delivered a total return of +1080%, compared to -18. 5% for Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GNRC returned +666. 1% versus HLIO's +109. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PSIX or GNRC or HUBB or HLIO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
38β versus Power Solutions International, Inc. 's 3. 33β — meaning PSIX is approximately 142% more volatile than HUBB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Helios Technologies, Inc. (HLIO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 85% for Power Solutions International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PSIX or GNRC or HUBB or HLIO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Helios Technologies, Inc.
(HLIO) is pulling ahead at 4. 1% versus -100. 0% for Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Power Solutions International, Inc. grew EPS 64. 1% year-over-year, compared to -50. 1% for Generac Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HUBB leads at 5. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PSIX or GNRC or HUBB or HLIO?
Power Solutions International, Inc.
(PSIX) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 5% net margin versus 3. 8% for Generac Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HUBB leads at 20. 8% versus 6. 9% for GNRC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GNRC leads at 38. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PSIX or GNRC or HUBB or HLIO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Helios Technologies, Inc. (HLIO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 00x versus Hubbell Incorporated's 1. 20x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX) trades at 15. 1x forward P/E versus 30. 9x for Generac Holdings Inc. — 15. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PSIX: 44. 8% to $104. 26.
08Which pays a better dividend — PSIX or GNRC or HUBB or HLIO?
In this comparison, HUBB (1.
1% yield), HLIO (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. PSIX, GNRC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PSIX or GNRC or HUBB or HLIO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.
1% yield, +410. 7% 10Y return). Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX) carries a higher beta of 3. 33 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HUBB: +410. 7%, PSIX: +559. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PSIX and GNRC and HUBB and HLIO?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PSIX is a small-cap deep-value stock; GNRC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; HUBB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; HLIO is a small-cap quality compounder stock. HUBB, HLIO pay a dividend while PSIX, GNRC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.