REIT - Office
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PSTL vs GIPR vs FCPT vs GOOD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Diversified
REIT - Retail
REIT - Diversified
PSTL vs GIPR vs FCPT vs GOOD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Office | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Retail | REIT - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $801M | $1M | $2.80B | $616M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $100M | $10M | $301M | $166M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $16M | $-10M | $117M | $21M |
| Gross Margin | 90.7% | 74.1% | 98.0% | -11.7% |
| Operating Margin | 37.2% | -66.7% | 56.0% | 27.9% |
| Forward P/E | 40.1x | — | 21.8x | 83.0x |
| Total Debt | $405M | $70M | $1.21B | $856M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $613K | $12M | $11M |
PSTL vs GIPR vs FCPT vs GOOD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Postal Realty Trust… (PSTL) | 100 | 117.4 | +17.4% |
| Generation Income P… (GIPR) | 100 | 3.7 | -96.3% |
| Four Corners Proper… (FCPT) | 100 | 87.8 | -12.2% |
| Gladstone Commercia… (GOOD) | 100 | 58.2 | -41.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PSTL vs GIPR vs FCPT vs GOOD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PSTL is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.30, current ratio 10.72x
- Beta 0.30, yield 5.5%, current ratio 10.72x
- +86.3% vs GIPR's -83.8%
GIPR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 27.9%, EPS growth 38.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.8%
- 27.9% FFO/revenue growth vs GOOD's 8.0%
- 100.0% yield, vs FCPT's 5.5%
FCPT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.14, yield 5.5%
- 99.1% 10Y total return vs PSTL's 69.1%
- Lower P/E (21.8x vs 40.1x)
- 38.7% margin vs GIPR's -103.2%
GOOD lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.9% FFO/revenue growth vs GOOD's 8.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (21.8x vs 40.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 38.7% margin vs GIPR's -103.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.14 vs GIPR's 1.73, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, vs FCPT's 5.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +86.3% vs GIPR's -83.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.1% ROA vs GIPR's -9.5%, ROIC 4.5% vs -4.0% |
PSTL vs GIPR vs FCPT vs GOOD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
PSTL vs GIPR vs FCPT vs GOOD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FCPT leads in 2 of 6 categories
GIPR leads 1 • PSTL leads 1 • GOOD leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FCPT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FCPT is the larger business by revenue, generating $301M annually — 30.2x GIPR's $10M. FCPT is the more profitable business, keeping 38.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GIPR's -103.2%. On growth, PSTL holds the edge at +20.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $100M | $10M | $301M | $166M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $62M | -$1M | $231M | $106M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $16M | -$10M | $117M | $21M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $38M | $654,400 | $188M | $90M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +90.7% | +74.1% | +98.0% | -11.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +37.2% | -66.7% | +56.0% | +27.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.8% | -103.2% | +38.7% | +12.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +38.2% | +6.6% | +62.5% | +54.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.3% | +2.9% | +9.4% | +11.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +83.3% | +5.5% | +7.7% | +2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
GIPR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.4x trailing earnings, FCPT trades at a 52% valuation discount to PSTL's 48.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GOOD offers better value at 0.88x vs FCPT's 118.24x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $801M | $1M | $2.8B | $616M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $71M | $4.0B | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 48.55x | -0.17x | 23.37x | 31.02x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 40.11x | — | 21.81x | 82.97x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 118.24x | 0.88x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.65x | — | 17.81x | 12.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.36x | 0.15x | 9.51x | 3.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.55x | 0.04x | 1.61x | 1.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.33x | 1.39x | 14.54x | 9.17x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FCPT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOD delivers a 9.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-32 for GIPR. FCPT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.74x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GOOD's 2.50x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PSTL scores 7/9 vs GOOD's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.5% | -32.2% | +7.4% | +9.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.1% | -9.5% | +4.1% | +1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.7% | -4.0% | +4.5% | +4.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.0% | -5.0% | +6.0% | +5.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.13x | 2.14x | 0.74x | 2.50x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $403M | $70M | $1.2B | $846M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $612,939 | $12M | $11M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $405M | $70M | $1.2B | $856M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.19x | -1.20x | 3.17x | 1.46x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PSTL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PSTL five years ago would be worth $13,579 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,333 for GIPR. Over the past 12 months, PSTL leads with a +86.3% total return vs GIPR's -83.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PSTL at 19.3% vs GIPR's -42.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +43.1% | -60.4% | +11.2% | +21.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +86.3% | -83.8% | -3.0% | +0.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +69.8% | -81.0% | +14.0% | +43.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.8% | -76.7% | +17.2% | -9.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +69.1% | -56.3% | +99.1% | +51.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.3% | -42.5% | +4.5% | +12.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PSTL and FCPT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FCPT is the less volatile stock with a 0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GIPR's 1.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PSTL currently trades 97.1% from its 52-week high vs GIPR's 13.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.30x | 1.73x | 0.14x | 0.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.49 | $1.99 | $28.14 | $15.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.51 | $0.23 | $22.78 | $10.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.1% | +13.1% | +90.5% | +84.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.0 | 42.9 | 55.6 | 49.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 249K | 1.1M | 658K | 390K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GIPR and FCPT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PSTL as "Buy", FCPT as "Hold", GOOD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 6.0% upside for FCPT (target: $27) vs -2.1% for PSTL (target: $22). For income investors, GIPR offers the higher dividend yield at 99.97% vs FCPT's 5.49%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.33 | — | $27.00 | $13.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | — | 15 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.5% | +100.0% | +5.5% | +11.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 0 | 8 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.26 | $0.26 | $1.40 | $1.44 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.7% |
FCPT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GIPR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
PSTL vs GIPR vs FCPT vs GOOD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PSTL or GIPR or FCPT or GOOD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Generation Income Properties, Inc.
(GIPR) is the stronger pick with 27. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 0% for Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD). Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT) offers the better valuation at 23. 4x trailing P/E (21. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Postal Realty Trust, Inc. (PSTL) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PSTL or GIPR or FCPT or GOOD?
On trailing P/E, Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.
(FCPT) is the cheapest at 23. 4x versus Postal Realty Trust, Inc. at 48. 6x. On forward P/E, Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. is actually cheaper at 21. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Gladstone Commercial Corporation wins at 2. 34x versus Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. 's 118. 24x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PSTL or GIPR or FCPT or GOOD?
Over the past 5 years, Postal Realty Trust, Inc.
(PSTL) delivered a total return of +35. 8%, compared to -76. 7% for Generation Income Properties, Inc. (GIPR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FCPT returned +99. 1% versus GIPR's -56. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PSTL or GIPR or FCPT or GOOD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.
(FCPT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 14β versus Generation Income Properties, Inc. 's 1. 73β — meaning GIPR is approximately 1113% more volatile than FCPT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 74% versus 3% for Gladstone Commercial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PSTL or GIPR or FCPT or GOOD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Generation Income Properties, Inc.
(GIPR) is pulling ahead at 27. 9% versus 8. 0% for Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Postal Realty Trust, Inc. grew EPS 123. 8% year-over-year, compared to 1. 9% for Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GIPR leads at 35. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PSTL or GIPR or FCPT or GOOD?
Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.
(FCPT) is the more profitable company, earning 38. 2% net margin versus -85. 5% for Generation Income Properties, Inc. — meaning it keeps 38. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FCPT leads at 55. 7% versus -52. 6% for GIPR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FCPT leads at 95. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PSTL or GIPR or FCPT or GOOD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 34x versus Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. 's 118. 24x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT) trades at 21. 8x forward P/E versus 83. 0x for Gladstone Commercial Corporation — 61. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FCPT: 6. 0% to $27. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PSTL or GIPR or FCPT or GOOD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Generation Income Properties, Inc. (GIPR) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 5. 5% for Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT).
09Is PSTL or GIPR or FCPT or GOOD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.
(FCPT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 14), 5. 5% yield). Generation Income Properties, Inc. (GIPR) carries a higher beta of 1. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FCPT: +99. 1%, GIPR: -56. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PSTL and GIPR and FCPT and GOOD?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PSTL is a small-cap high-growth stock; GIPR is a small-cap high-growth stock; FCPT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GOOD is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.