REIT - Office
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PSTL vs GIPR vs FCPT vs GOOD vs NNN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Diversified
REIT - Retail
REIT - Diversified
REIT - Retail
PSTL vs GIPR vs FCPT vs GOOD vs NNN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Office | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Retail | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $801M | $1M | $2.80B | $616M | $8.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $100M | $10M | $301M | $166M | $936M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $16M | $-10M | $117M | $21M | $387M |
| Gross Margin | 90.7% | 74.1% | 98.0% | -11.7% | 81.4% |
| Operating Margin | 37.2% | -66.7% | 56.0% | 27.9% | 63.3% |
| Forward P/E | 40.1x | — | 21.8x | 83.0x | 21.7x |
| Total Debt | $405M | $70M | $1.21B | $856M | $4.82B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $613K | $12M | $11M | $5M |
PSTL vs GIPR vs FCPT vs GOOD vs NNN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Postal Realty Trust… (PSTL) | 100 | 117.4 | +17.4% |
| Generation Income P… (GIPR) | 100 | 3.7 | -96.3% |
| Four Corners Proper… (FCPT) | 100 | 87.8 | -12.2% |
| Gladstone Commercia… (GOOD) | 100 | 58.2 | -41.8% |
| NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) | 100 | 98.1 | -1.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PSTL vs GIPR vs FCPT vs GOOD vs NNN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PSTL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.
- Beta 0.30, yield 5.5%, current ratio 10.72x
- +86.3% vs GIPR's -83.8%
GIPR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 27.9%, EPS growth 38.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.8%
- 27.9% FFO/revenue growth vs NNN's 6.6%
- 100.0% yield, vs NNN's 5.3%
FCPT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.14, yield 5.5%
- 99.1% 10Y total return vs PSTL's 69.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.14, Low D/E 74.2%, current ratio 0.30x
- Beta 0.14 vs GIPR's 1.73, lower leverage
Among these 5 stocks, GOOD doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NNN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 1.94 vs GOOD's 2.34
- Lower P/E (21.7x vs 83.0x), PEG 1.94 vs 2.34
- 41.4% margin vs GIPR's -103.2%
- 4.1% ROA vs GIPR's -9.5%, ROIC 4.8% vs -4.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.9% FFO/revenue growth vs NNN's 6.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (21.7x vs 83.0x), PEG 1.94 vs 2.34 | |
| Quality / Margins | 41.4% margin vs GIPR's -103.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.14 vs GIPR's 1.73, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, vs NNN's 5.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +86.3% vs GIPR's -83.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.1% ROA vs GIPR's -9.5%, ROIC 4.8% vs -4.0% |
PSTL vs GIPR vs FCPT vs GOOD vs NNN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
PSTL vs GIPR vs FCPT vs GOOD vs NNN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GIPR leads in 1 of 6 categories
PSTL leads 1 • FCPT leads 0 • GOOD leads 0 • NNN leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — FCPT and NNN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NNN is the larger business by revenue, generating $936M annually — 94.0x GIPR's $10M. NNN is the more profitable business, keeping 41.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GIPR's -103.2%. On growth, PSTL holds the edge at +20.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $100M | $10M | $301M | $166M | $936M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $62M | -$1M | $231M | $106M | $867M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $16M | -$10M | $117M | $21M | $387M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $38M | $654,400 | $188M | $90M | $464M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +90.7% | +74.1% | +98.0% | -11.7% | +81.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +37.2% | -66.7% | +56.0% | +27.9% | +63.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.8% | -103.2% | +38.7% | +12.7% | +41.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +38.2% | +6.6% | +62.5% | +54.1% | +49.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.3% | +2.9% | +9.4% | +11.8% | +4.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +83.3% | +5.5% | +7.7% | +2.8% | -2.0% |
Valuation Metrics
GIPR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.5x trailing earnings, NNN trades at a 56% valuation discount to PSTL's 48.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GOOD offers better value at 0.88x vs FCPT's 118.24x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $801M | $1M | $2.8B | $616M | $8.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $71M | $4.0B | $1.5B | $13.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 48.55x | -0.17x | 23.37x | 31.02x | 21.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 40.11x | — | 21.81x | 82.97x | 21.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 118.24x | 0.88x | 1.93x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.65x | — | 17.81x | 12.36x | 15.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.36x | 0.15x | 9.51x | 3.82x | 9.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.55x | 0.04x | 1.61x | 1.76x | 1.90x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.33x | 1.39x | 14.54x | 9.17x | 12.69x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — FCPT and NNN each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOD delivers a 9.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-32 for GIPR. FCPT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.74x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GOOD's 2.50x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PSTL scores 7/9 vs NNN's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.5% | -32.2% | +7.4% | +9.7% | +8.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.1% | -9.5% | +4.1% | +1.7% | +4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.7% | -4.0% | +4.5% | +4.4% | +4.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.0% | -5.0% | +6.0% | +5.3% | +6.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.13x | 2.14x | 0.74x | 2.50x | 1.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $403M | $70M | $1.2B | $846M | $4.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $612,939 | $12M | $11M | $5M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $405M | $70M | $1.2B | $856M | $4.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.19x | -1.20x | 3.17x | 1.46x | 2.93x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PSTL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PSTL five years ago would be worth $13,579 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,333 for GIPR. Over the past 12 months, PSTL leads with a +86.3% total return vs GIPR's -83.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PSTL at 19.3% vs GIPR's -42.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +43.1% | -60.4% | +11.2% | +21.6% | +15.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +86.3% | -83.8% | -3.0% | +0.7% | +12.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +69.8% | -81.0% | +14.0% | +43.8% | +15.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.8% | -76.7% | +17.2% | -9.7% | +15.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +69.1% | -56.3% | +99.1% | +51.0% | +37.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.3% | -42.5% | +4.5% | +12.9% | +4.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PSTL and FCPT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FCPT is the less volatile stock with a 0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GIPR's 1.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PSTL currently trades 97.1% from its 52-week high vs GIPR's 13.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.30x | 1.73x | 0.14x | 0.55x | 0.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.49 | $1.99 | $28.14 | $15.03 | $46.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.51 | $0.23 | $22.78 | $10.33 | $38.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.1% | +13.1% | +90.5% | +84.6% | +96.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.0 | 42.9 | 55.6 | 49.1 | 58.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 249K | 1.1M | 658K | 390K | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GIPR and NNN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PSTL as "Buy", FCPT as "Hold", GOOD as "Buy", NNN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 6.0% upside for FCPT (target: $27) vs -2.1% for PSTL (target: $22). For income investors, GIPR offers the higher dividend yield at 99.97% vs NNN's 5.30%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.33 | — | $27.00 | $13.00 | $46.06 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | — | 15 | 14 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.5% | +100.0% | +5.5% | +11.4% | +5.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 9 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.26 | $0.26 | $1.40 | $1.44 | $2.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.7% | 0.0% |
GIPR leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). PSTL leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.
PSTL vs GIPR vs FCPT vs GOOD vs NNN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PSTL or GIPR or FCPT or GOOD or NNN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Generation Income Properties, Inc.
(GIPR) is the stronger pick with 27. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 6% for NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN). NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) offers the better valuation at 21. 5x trailing P/E (21. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Postal Realty Trust, Inc. (PSTL) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PSTL or GIPR or FCPT or GOOD or NNN?
On trailing P/E, NNN REIT, Inc.
(NNN) is the cheapest at 21. 5x versus Postal Realty Trust, Inc. at 48. 6x. On forward P/E, NNN REIT, Inc. is actually cheaper at 21. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NNN REIT, Inc. wins at 1. 94x versus Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. 's 118. 24x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PSTL or GIPR or FCPT or GOOD or NNN?
Over the past 5 years, Postal Realty Trust, Inc.
(PSTL) delivered a total return of +35. 8%, compared to -76. 7% for Generation Income Properties, Inc. (GIPR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FCPT returned +99. 1% versus GIPR's -56. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PSTL or GIPR or FCPT or GOOD or NNN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.
(FCPT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 14β versus Generation Income Properties, Inc. 's 1. 73β — meaning GIPR is approximately 1113% more volatile than FCPT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 74% versus 3% for Gladstone Commercial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PSTL or GIPR or FCPT or GOOD or NNN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Generation Income Properties, Inc.
(GIPR) is pulling ahead at 27. 9% versus 6. 6% for NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Postal Realty Trust, Inc. grew EPS 123. 8% year-over-year, compared to -3. 7% for NNN REIT, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GIPR leads at 35. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PSTL or GIPR or FCPT or GOOD or NNN?
NNN REIT, Inc.
(NNN) is the more profitable company, earning 42. 1% net margin versus -85. 5% for Generation Income Properties, Inc. — meaning it keeps 42. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NNN leads at 61. 5% versus -52. 6% for GIPR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FCPT leads at 95. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PSTL or GIPR or FCPT or GOOD or NNN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 94x versus Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. 's 118. 24x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) trades at 21. 7x forward P/E versus 83. 0x for Gladstone Commercial Corporation — 61. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FCPT: 6. 0% to $27. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PSTL or GIPR or FCPT or GOOD or NNN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Generation Income Properties, Inc. (GIPR) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 5. 3% for NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN).
09Is PSTL or GIPR or FCPT or GOOD or NNN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.
(FCPT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 14), 5. 5% yield). Generation Income Properties, Inc. (GIPR) carries a higher beta of 1. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FCPT: +99. 1%, GIPR: -56. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PSTL and GIPR and FCPT and GOOD and NNN?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PSTL is a small-cap high-growth stock; GIPR is a small-cap high-growth stock; FCPT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GOOD is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NNN is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.