PTEN
Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.
Oil & Gas Drilling
Market Cap$4.33B
5Y Perf.+209.2%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
PTEN vs SLB vs HAL vs BKR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
SLB
SLB N.V.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$79.62B
5Y Perf.+187.2%
HAL
Halliburton Company
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$32.68B
5Y Perf.+233.0%
BKR
Baker Hughes Company
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$63.00B
5Y Perf.+284.8%
PTEN vs SLB vs HAL vs BKR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | PTEN | SLB | HAL | BKR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Drilling | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $4.33B | $79.62B | $32.68B | $63.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.66B | $35.71B | $22.17B | $27.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-119M | $3.35B | $1.54B | $3.12B |
| Gross Margin | 8.8% | 18.2% | 15.3% | 23.6% |
| Operating Margin | -1.6% | 15.3% | 11.3% | 25.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 19.8x | 16.8x | 26.5x |
| Total Debt | $1.28B | $12.31B | $8.13B | $7.14B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $421M | $3.04B | $2.21B | $3.71B |
PTEN vs SLB vs HAL vs BKR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
PTEN
SLB
HAL
BKR
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patterson-UTI Energ… (PTEN) | 100 | 309.2 | +209.2% |
| SLB N.V. (SLB) | 100 | 287.2 | +187.2% |
| Halliburton Company (HAL) | 100 | 333.0 | +233.0% |
| Baker Hughes Company (BKR) | 100 | 384.8 | +284.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PTEN vs SLB vs HAL vs BKR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: BKR leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and recent price momentum and sentiment. HAL also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
PTEN
Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.
The Income Pick
PTEN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends and momentum is your priority.
- 2.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SLB's 2.0%
- +111.0% vs SLB's +61.8%
Best for: dividends and momentum
SLB
SLB N.V.
The Income Angle
SLB lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: energy exposure
HAL
Halliburton Company
The Income Pick
HAL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.57, yield 1.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.57, Low D/E 77.4%, current ratio 2.04x
- Beta 0.57, yield 1.8%, current ratio 2.04x
- Lower P/E (16.8x vs 26.5x)
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
BKR
Baker Hughes Company
The Growth Play
BKR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -0.3%, EPS growth -12.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.4%
- 186.8% 10Y total return vs HAL's 16.2%
- -0.3% revenue growth vs PTEN's -10.3%
- 11.2% margin vs PTEN's -2.6%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | BKR | -0.3% revenue growth vs PTEN's -10.3% |
| Value | HAL | Lower P/E (16.8x vs 26.5x) |
| Quality / Margins | BKR | 11.2% margin vs PTEN's -2.6% |
| Stability / Safety | HAL | Beta 0.57 vs SLB's 0.87 |
| Dividends | PTEN | 2.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SLB's 2.0% |
| Momentum (1Y) | PTEN | +111.0% vs SLB's +61.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | BKR | 7.3% ROA vs PTEN's -2.2%, ROIC 12.7% vs -0.4% |
PTEN vs SLB vs HAL vs BKR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
PTEN vs SLB vs HAL vs BKR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLBKRLAGGINGHAL
Who Leads Where
BKR leads in 3 of 6 categories
PTEN leads 1 • SLB leads 0 • HAL leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓HALHalliburton Company
0leads
SLBSLB N.V.
0leads
PTENPatterson-UTI Energy,…
1leads
BKRBaker Hughes Company
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs PTENvs SLBMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
BKR4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
PTEN5/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
BKR6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
BKR4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SLB is the larger business by revenue, generating $35.7B annually — 7.7x PTEN's $4.7B. BKR is the more profitable business, keeping 11.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PTEN's -2.6%. On growth, SLB holds the edge at +5.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | PTENPatterson-UTI Ene… | SLBSLB N.V. | HALHalliburton Compa… | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.7B | $35.7B | $22.2B | $27.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $851M | $7.4B | $3.4B | $4.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$119M | $3.4B | $1.5B | $3.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $273M | $4.8B | $1.7B | $2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +8.8% | +18.2% | +15.3% | +23.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.6% | +15.3% | +11.3% | +25.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | +9.4% | +6.9% | +11.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | +13.4% | +7.6% | +9.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -12.7% | +5.0% | -0.3% | +2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -31.2% | +129.2% | +132.5% |
BKR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
PTEN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.6x trailing earnings, SLB trades at a 13% valuation discount to HAL's 26.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PTEN's 5.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BKR's 14.0x.
| Metric | PTENPatterson-UTI Ene… | SLBSLB N.V. | HALHalliburton Compa… | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.3B | $79.6B | $32.7B | $63.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.2B | $88.9B | $38.6B | $66.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -47.54x | 22.57x | 26.09x | 24.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 19.79x | 16.85x | 26.48x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.67x | 12.07x | 11.37x | 14.00x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.90x | 2.23x | 1.47x | 2.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.36x | 2.89x | 3.13x | 3.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.64x | 16.60x | 19.55x | 24.83x |
PTEN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BKR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BKR delivers a 16.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-4 for PTEN. BKR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.38x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HAL's 0.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BKR scores 6/9 vs SLB's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | PTENPatterson-UTI Ene… | SLBSLB N.V. | HALHalliburton Compa… | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.7% | +13.9% | +14.6% | +16.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.2% | +6.5% | +6.1% | +7.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.4% | +12.1% | +10.2% | +12.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.5% | +14.3% | +11.6% | +13.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.40x | 0.45x | 0.77x | 0.38x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $860M | $9.3B | $5.9B | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $421M | $3.0B | $2.2B | $3.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.3B | $12.3B | $8.1B | $7.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.96x | 9.40x | 9.19x | 9.68x |
BKR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BKR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BKR five years ago would be worth $27,526 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,872 for PTEN. Over the past 12 months, PTEN leads with a +111.0% total return vs SLB's +61.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BKR at 33.1% vs PTEN's 5.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | PTENPatterson-UTI Ene… | SLBSLB N.V. | HALHalliburton Compa… | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +77.9% | +32.7% | +32.8% | +35.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +111.0% | +61.8% | +105.6% | +77.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +17.3% | +20.8% | +37.4% | +136.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.7% | +80.6% | +82.6% | +175.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.1% | -9.2% | +16.2% | +186.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.5% | +6.5% | +11.2% | +33.1% |
BKR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SLB and HAL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HAL is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SLB's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | PTENPatterson-UTI Ene… | SLBSLB N.V. | HALHalliburton Compa… | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.59x | 0.87x | 0.57x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.62 | $57.20 | $42.46 | $70.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.10 | $31.64 | $19.22 | $35.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.4% | +92.7% | +92.2% | +90.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.4 | 57.9 | 55.7 | 57.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10.6M | 16.3M | 15.0M | 9.1M |
Evenly matched — SLB and HAL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PTEN and SLB and HAL and BKR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PTEN as "Buy", SLB as "Buy", HAL as "Buy", BKR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 13.3% upside for BKR (target: $72) vs -5.2% for HAL (target: $37). For income investors, PTEN offers the higher dividend yield at 2.80% vs BKR's 1.44%.
| Metric | PTENPatterson-UTI Ene… | SLBSLB N.V. | HALHalliburton Compa… | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.00 | $56.95 | $37.08 | $72.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 53 | 66 | 64 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.8% | +2.0% | +1.8% | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.32 | $1.08 | $0.69 | $0.92 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | +3.0% | +3.1% | +0.6% |
Evenly matched — PTEN and SLB and HAL and BKR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
BKR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PTEN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallBaker Hughes Company (BKR)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
PTEN vs SLB vs HAL vs BKR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PTEN or SLB or HAL or BKR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Baker Hughes Company (BKR) is the stronger pick with -0.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 3% for Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. (PTEN). SLB N. V. (SLB) offers the better valuation at 22. 6x trailing P/E (19. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. (PTEN) a "Buy" — based on 53 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PTEN or SLB or HAL or BKR?
On trailing P/E, SLB N.
V. (SLB) is the cheapest at 22. 6x versus Halliburton Company at 26. 1x. On forward P/E, Halliburton Company is actually cheaper at 16. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PTEN or SLB or HAL or BKR?
Over the past 5 years, Baker Hughes Company (BKR) delivered a total return of +175.
3%, compared to +48. 7% for Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. (PTEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BKR returned +186. 8% versus PTEN's -22. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PTEN or SLB or HAL or BKR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Halliburton Company (HAL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
57β versus SLB N. V. 's 0. 87β — meaning SLB is approximately 52% more volatile than HAL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Baker Hughes Company (BKR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 38% versus 77% for Halliburton Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PTEN or SLB or HAL or BKR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Baker Hughes Company (BKR) is pulling ahead at -0.
3% versus -10. 3% for Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. (PTEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. grew EPS 90. 2% year-over-year, compared to -47. 0% for Halliburton Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, PTEN leads at 22. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PTEN or SLB or HAL or BKR?
SLB N.
V. (SLB) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 4% net margin versus -1. 9% for Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SLB leads at 15. 3% versus -0. 5% for PTEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BKR leads at 23. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PTEN or SLB or HAL or BKR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Halliburton Company (HAL) trades at 16.
8x forward P/E versus 26. 5x for Baker Hughes Company — 9. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BKR: 13. 3% to $72. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PTEN or SLB or HAL or BKR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. (PTEN) offers the highest yield at 2. 8%, versus 1. 4% for Baker Hughes Company (BKR).
09Is PTEN or SLB or HAL or BKR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Halliburton Company (HAL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
57), 1. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HAL: +16. 2%, SLB: -9. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PTEN and SLB and HAL and BKR?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(PTEN: -12.7% · SLB: 5.0%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.