Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PTHS vs COLL vs AVDL vs SUPN vs LNTH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
PTHS vs COLL vs AVDL vs SUPN vs LNTH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic |
| Market Cap | $15M | $1.27B | $2.10B | $3.01B | $5.92B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7M | $796M | $249M | $777M | $1.55B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-24M | $75M | $-278K | $-29M | $279M |
| Gross Margin | 54.3% | 60.7% | 94.5% | 89.4% | 60.5% |
| Operating Margin | -300.5% | 23.7% | 1.8% | -5.5% | 18.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 5.4x | 28.3x | 24.1x | 17.5x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $941M | $2M | $41M | $738K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $513K | $251M | $51M | $128M | $359M |
PTHS vs COLL vs AVDL vs SUPN vs LNTH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pelthos Therapeutic… (PTHS) | 100 | 205.6 | +105.6% |
| Collegium Pharmaceu… (COLL) | 100 | 133.0 | +33.0% |
| Avadel Pharmaceutic… (AVDL) | 100 | 243.5 | +143.5% |
| Supernus Pharmaceut… (SUPN) | 100 | 165.9 | +65.9% |
| Lantheus Holdings, … (LNTH) | 100 | 111.2 | +11.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PTHS vs COLL vs AVDL vs SUPN vs LNTH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PTHS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
COLL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.65
- Lower P/E (5.4x vs 17.5x)
AVDL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 5.0%, EPS growth 74.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.23, Low D/E 2.3%, current ratio 2.75x
- Beta 0.23, current ratio 2.75x
- 5.0% revenue growth vs PTHS's -114.7%
Among these 5 stocks, SUPN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
LNTH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 41.9% 10Y total return vs SUPN's 228.4%
- 18.0% margin vs PTHS's -318.4%
- 12.4% ROA vs PTHS's -18.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.0% revenue growth vs PTHS's -114.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.4x vs 17.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.0% margin vs PTHS's -318.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.23 vs SUPN's 0.78, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +128.5% vs LNTH's +13.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.4% ROA vs PTHS's -18.7% |
PTHS vs COLL vs AVDL vs SUPN vs LNTH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PTHS vs COLL vs AVDL vs SUPN vs LNTH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
COLL leads in 2 of 6 categories
LNTH leads 2 • PTHS leads 0 • AVDL leads 0 • SUPN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COLL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LNTH is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 208.8x PTHS's $7M. LNTH is the more profitable business, keeping 18.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PTHS's -3.2%. On growth, AVDL holds the edge at +54.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7M | $796M | $249M | $777M | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$21M | $472M | $8M | $29M | $347M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$24M | $75M | -$278,000 | -$29M | $279M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$17M | $330M | $35M | $82M | $372M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.3% | +60.7% | +94.5% | +89.4% | +60.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.0% | +23.7% | +1.8% | -5.5% | +18.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.2% | +9.4% | -0.1% | -3.7% | +18.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | +41.4% | +14.2% | +10.6% | +24.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +8.9% | +54.9% | +38.6% | +1.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.7% | +4.4% | +100.7% | +81.0% | +76.5% |
Valuation Metrics
COLL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.7x trailing earnings, COLL trades at a 15% valuation discount to LNTH's 26.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, COLL's 4.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SUPN's 53.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $15M | $1.3B | $2.1B | $3.0B | $5.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $17M | $2.0B | $2.1B | $2.9B | $5.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.91x | 22.73x | -42.43x | -76.88x | 26.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 5.43x | 28.28x | 24.12x | 17.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.27x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 4.75x | — | 53.44x | 14.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1.63x | 12.44x | 4.19x | 3.84x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 5.18x | 27.88x | 2.78x | 5.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 3.89x | — | 65.45x | 16.73x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LNTH leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
COLL delivers a 26.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-40 for PTHS. LNTH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to COLL's 3.12x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), COLL scores 6/9 vs SUPN's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -40.5% | +26.7% | -0.3% | -2.7% | +24.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -18.7% | +4.6% | -0.2% | -2.0% | +12.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +14.0% | -76.3% | -2.8% | +30.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +15.8% | -34.9% | -3.4% | +17.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 3.12x | 0.02x | 0.04x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $689M | -$50M | -$87M | -$358M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $513,443 | $251M | $51M | $128M | $359M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $941M | $2M | $41M | $738,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -12.31x | 1.80x | 0.66x | — | 11.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LNTH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LNTH five years ago would be worth $41,420 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,097 for COLL. Over the past 12 months, AVDL leads with a +128.5% total return vs LNTH's +13.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PTHS at 30.0% vs LNTH's -1.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.0% | -13.6% | +0.6% | +5.7% | +35.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +119.6% | +45.4% | +128.5% | +69.0% | +13.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +119.6% | +67.9% | +45.8% | +42.1% | -4.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +119.6% | +71.0% | +164.9% | +78.0% | +314.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +119.6% | +153.1% | +113.0% | +228.4% | +4192.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +30.0% | +18.9% | +13.4% | +12.4% | -1.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AVDL and LNTH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AVDL is the less volatile stock with a 0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SUPN's 0.78 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LNTH currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs PTHS's 47.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.68x | 0.65x | 0.23x | 0.78x | 0.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $54.29 | $50.79 | $23.57 | $59.68 | $93.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.20 | $26.72 | $8.44 | $29.16 | $47.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +47.7% | +77.4% | +91.8% | +87.6% | +97.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.7 | 62.4 | 61.8 | 57.9 | 61.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 11K | 543K | 0 | 604K | 886K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: COLL as "Buy", AVDL as "Buy", SUPN as "Buy", LNTH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 47.5% upside for COLL (target: $58) vs 4.0% for AVDL (target: $23).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $58.00 | $22.50 | $60.00 | $101.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 14 | 14 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | +2.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.1% |
COLL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). LNTH leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
PTHS vs COLL vs AVDL vs SUPN vs LNTH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PTHS or COLL or AVDL or SUPN or LNTH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Avadel Pharmaceuticals plc (AVDL) is the stronger pick with 504.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 5% for Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (LNTH). Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. (COLL) offers the better valuation at 22. 7x trailing P/E (5. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. (COLL) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PTHS or COLL or AVDL or SUPN or LNTH?
On trailing P/E, Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc.
(COLL) is the cheapest at 22. 7x versus Lantheus Holdings, Inc. at 26. 7x. On forward P/E, Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PTHS or COLL or AVDL or SUPN or LNTH?
Over the past 5 years, Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
(LNTH) delivered a total return of +314. 2%, compared to +71. 0% for Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. (COLL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LNTH returned +41. 9% versus AVDL's +113. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PTHS or COLL or AVDL or SUPN or LNTH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Avadel Pharmaceuticals plc (AVDL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
23β versus Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 0. 78β — meaning SUPN is approximately 242% more volatile than AVDL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (LNTH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PTHS or COLL or AVDL or SUPN or LNTH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Avadel Pharmaceuticals plc (AVDL) is pulling ahead at 504.
8% versus 0. 5% for Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (LNTH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Avadel Pharmaceuticals plc grew EPS 74. 5% year-over-year, compared to -151. 5% for Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, COLL leads at 18. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PTHS or COLL or AVDL or SUPN or LNTH?
Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
(LNTH) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 2% net margin versus -318. 4% for Pelthos Therapeutics Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: COLL leads at 24. 0% versus -300. 5% for PTHS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AVDL leads at 91. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PTHS or COLL or AVDL or SUPN or LNTH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc.
(COLL) trades at 5. 4x forward P/E versus 28. 3x for Avadel Pharmaceuticals plc — 22. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COLL: 47. 5% to $58. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PTHS or COLL or AVDL or SUPN or LNTH?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is PTHS or COLL or AVDL or SUPN or LNTH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Avadel Pharmaceuticals plc (AVDL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
23), +113. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AVDL: +113. 0%, SUPN: +228. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PTHS and COLL and AVDL and SUPN and LNTH?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PTHS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; COLL is a small-cap high-growth stock; AVDL is a small-cap high-growth stock; SUPN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LNTH is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.