Household & Personal Products
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PTNM vs WMT vs TGT vs USAS vs EXK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Discount Stores
Industrial Materials
Other Precious Metals
PTNM vs WMT vs TGT vs USAS vs EXK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Household & Personal Products | Specialty Retail | Discount Stores | Industrial Materials | Other Precious Metals |
| Market Cap | $208M | $1.04T | $55.47B | $2.35B | $3.37B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $75M | $703.06B | $106.25B | $109M | $330M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $9M | $22.91B | $4.04B | $-61M | $-94M |
| Gross Margin | 81.2% | 24.9% | 27.3% | 3.3% | 9.3% |
| Operating Margin | 14.7% | 4.1% | 5.3% | -25.5% | -1.7% |
| Forward P/E | 193.7x | 44.8x | 15.2x | 30.9x | 16.2x |
| Total Debt | $19M | $67.09B | $5.59B | $24M | $120M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $17M | $10.73B | $5.49B | $20M | $106M |
PTNM vs WMT vs TGT vs USAS vs EXK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 315.2 | +215.2% |
| Target Corporation (TGT) | 100 | 99.5 | -0.5% |
| Americas Gold and S… (USAS) | 100 | 149.0 | +49.0% |
| Endeavour Silver Co… (EXK) | 100 | 596.9 | +496.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PTNM vs WMT vs TGT vs USAS vs EXK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PTNM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and quality.
- 9.9% revenue growth vs TGT's -1.7%
- 11.9% margin vs USAS's -56.2%
- 22.2% ROA vs USAS's -26.1%, ROIC 73.1% vs -26.3%
WMT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.11, yield 0.7%
- 5.2% 10Y total return vs EXK's 208.9%
- Beta 0.11 vs USAS's 2.50
TGT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 0.94, yield 3.7%, current ratio 0.94x
- Lower P/E (15.2x vs 16.2x)
- 3.7% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
USAS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.3%, EPS growth -5.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.5%
- +5.2% vs TGT's +25.0%
EXK is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.80, Low D/E 24.8%, current ratio 2.00x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.9% revenue growth vs TGT's -1.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.2x vs 16.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.9% margin vs USAS's -56.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.11 vs USAS's 2.50 | |
| Dividends | 3.7% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.2% vs TGT's +25.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 22.2% ROA vs USAS's -26.1%, ROIC 73.1% vs -26.3% |
PTNM vs WMT vs TGT vs USAS vs EXK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PTNM vs WMT vs TGT vs USAS vs EXK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PTNM leads in 2 of 6 categories
TGT leads 1 • USAS leads 1 • WMT leads 0 • EXK leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PTNM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 9382.9x PTNM's $75M. PTNM is the more profitable business, keeping 11.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to USAS's -56.2%. On growth, EXK holds the edge at +154.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $75M | $703.1B | $106.2B | $109M | $330M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $42.8B | $8.7B | -$7M | $49M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $22.9B | $4.0B | -$61M | -$94M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $15.3B | $2.9B | -$52M | -$129M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +81.2% | +24.9% | +27.3% | +3.3% | +9.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.7% | +4.1% | +5.3% | -25.5% | -1.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +3.3% | +3.8% | -56.2% | -28.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.2% | +2.2% | +2.8% | -47.7% | -39.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +5.8% | +3.2% | +45.6% | +154.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +35.1% | +23.7% | +55.3% | -97.5% |
Valuation Metrics
TGT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.0x trailing earnings, TGT trades at a 92% valuation discount to PTNM's 193.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TGT's 7.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than EXK's 85.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $208M | $1.04T | $55.5B | $2.3B | $3.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $208M | $1.10T | $55.6B | $2.4B | $3.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 193.69x | 47.75x | 14.98x | -17.60x | -88.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 44.76x | 15.22x | 30.93x | 16.19x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.34x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 85.04x | 24.88x | 7.02x | — | 85.79x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 21.73x | 1.46x | 0.53x | 23.44x | 15.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 145.65x | 10.47x | 3.43x | 14.65x | 5.73x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 24.99x | 19.57x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
PTNM leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PTNM delivers a 81.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $81 in annual profit, vs $-122 for USAS. EXK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.25x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PTNM's 1.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WMT scores 6/9 vs USAS's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +81.3% | +22.3% | +26.1% | -122.1% | -18.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +22.2% | +7.9% | +6.9% | -26.1% | -9.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +73.1% | +14.7% | +16.7% | -26.3% | +1.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +74.5% | +17.5% | +13.6% | -21.6% | +1.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.59x | 0.67x | 0.35x | 0.45x | 0.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $56.4B | $104M | $4M | $14M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $17M | $10.7B | $5.5B | $20M | $106M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19M | $67.1B | $5.6B | $24M | $120M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 12.66x | 11.85x | 12.40x | -18.89x | -39.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
USAS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $29,682 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,029 for TGT. Over the past 12 months, USAS leads with a +521.0% total return vs TGT's +25.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors USAS at 94.1% vs TGT's -5.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | 0.0% | +16.0% | +22.3% | +44.6% | +27.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +173.4% | +35.7% | +25.0% | +521.0% | +242.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +173.4% | +160.7% | -14.5% | +631.7% | +237.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +173.4% | +196.8% | -29.7% | +64.2% | +97.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +173.4% | +519.3% | +105.5% | +10.0% | +208.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +39.8% | +37.6% | -5.1% | +94.1% | +49.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PTNM and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PTNM is the less volatile stock with a -0.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than USAS's 2.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs PTNM's 70.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.24x | 0.11x | 0.94x | 2.50x | 1.80x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.79 | $134.69 | $133.07 | $10.50 | $15.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.98 | $91.89 | $83.44 | $1.06 | $3.14 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.3% | +96.8% | +91.5% | +70.4% | +75.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.8 | 47.9 | 37.2 | 63.1 | 64.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 16.8M | 4.5M | 5.8M | 9.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WMT and TGT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WMT as "Buy", TGT as "Hold", USAS as "Buy", EXK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.9% upside for USAS (target: $10) vs -5.2% for TGT (target: $115). For income investors, TGT offers the higher dividend yield at 3.70% vs PTNM's 0.43%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $137.22 | $115.44 | $9.75 | $12.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 64 | 59 | 4 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | +0.7% | +3.7% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 37 | 22 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.35 | $0.94 | $4.51 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% | +0.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
PTNM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TGT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
PTNM vs WMT vs TGT vs USAS vs EXK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PTNM or WMT or TGT or USAS or EXK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Pitanium Limited (PTNM) is the stronger pick with 9.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 7% for Target Corporation (TGT). Target Corporation (TGT) offers the better valuation at 15. 0x trailing P/E (15. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Walmart Inc. (WMT) a "Buy" — based on 64 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PTNM or WMT or TGT or USAS or EXK?
On trailing P/E, Target Corporation (TGT) is the cheapest at 15.
0x versus Pitanium Limited at 193. 7x. On forward P/E, Target Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PTNM or WMT or TGT or USAS or EXK?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +196. 8%, compared to -29. 7% for Target Corporation (TGT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +519. 3% versus USAS's +10. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PTNM or WMT or TGT or USAS or EXK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pitanium Limited (PTNM) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
24β versus Americas Gold and Silver Corporation's 2. 50β — meaning USAS is approximately -1151% more volatile than PTNM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 159% for Pitanium Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PTNM or WMT or TGT or USAS or EXK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Pitanium Limited (PTNM) is pulling ahead at 9.
9% versus -1. 7% for Target Corporation (TGT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Walmart Inc. grew EPS 13. 3% year-over-year, compared to -519. 4% for Endeavour Silver Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, USAS leads at 30. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PTNM or WMT or TGT or USAS or EXK?
Pitanium Limited (PTNM) is the more profitable company, earning 11.
9% net margin versus -44. 9% for Americas Gold and Silver Corporation — meaning it keeps 11. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PTNM leads at 14. 7% versus -26. 2% for USAS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PTNM leads at 81. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PTNM or WMT or TGT or USAS or EXK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Target Corporation (TGT) trades at 15.
2x forward P/E versus 44. 8x for Walmart Inc. — 29. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for USAS: 31. 9% to $9. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — PTNM or WMT or TGT or USAS or EXK?
In this comparison, TGT (3.
7% yield), WMT (0. 7% yield), PTNM (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. USAS, EXK do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PTNM or WMT or TGT or USAS or EXK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 11), 0. 7% yield, +519. 3% 10Y return). Americas Gold and Silver Corporation (USAS) carries a higher beta of 2. 50 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +519. 3%, USAS: +10. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PTNM and WMT and TGT and USAS and EXK?
These companies operate in different sectors (PTNM (Consumer Defensive) and WMT (Consumer Defensive) and TGT (Consumer Defensive) and USAS (Basic Materials) and EXK (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PTNM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; TGT is a mid-cap deep-value stock; USAS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EXK is a small-cap quality compounder stock. WMT, TGT pay a dividend while PTNM, USAS, EXK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.