Marine Shipping
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PXS vs TK vs STNG vs INSW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
PXS vs TK vs STNG vs INSW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $47M | $1.18B | $4.38B | $4.46B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $39M | $993M | $1.04B | $676M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $79M | $502M | $546M |
| Gross Margin | 41.2% | 28.1% | 51.8% | 40.6% |
| Operating Margin | 15.2% | 24.8% | 38.8% | 44.4% |
| Forward P/E | 23.4x | 64.0x | 8.6x | 8.5x |
| Total Debt | $87M | $66M | $619M | $576M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $36M | $685M | $752M | $117M |
PXS vs TK vs STNG vs INSW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pyxis Tankers Inc. (PXS) | 100 | 117.4 | +17.4% |
| Teekay Corporation (TK) | 100 | 480.9 | +380.9% |
| Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) | 100 | 477.4 | +377.4% |
| International Seawa… (INSW) | 100 | 397.6 | +297.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PXS vs TK vs STNG vs INSW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PXS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
TK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.38, yield 6.5%
- Rev growth -16.7%, EPS growth -7.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 21.4%
- 6.5% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs STNG's 2.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
STNG is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 19.4%, current ratio 9.33x
- Beta 0.28, yield 2.0%, current ratio 9.33x
- Beta 0.28 vs INSW's 0.43, lower leverage
INSW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 10.1% 10Y total return vs TK's 97.1%
- -11.4% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6%
- Lower P/E (8.5x vs 8.6x)
- 80.8% margin vs PXS's 5.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -11.4% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.5x vs 8.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 80.8% margin vs PXS's 5.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.28 vs INSW's 0.43, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.5% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs STNG's 2.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +160.2% vs PXS's +48.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 20.1% ROA vs PXS's 1.1%, ROIC 9.4% vs 2.8% |
PXS vs TK vs STNG vs INSW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PXS vs TK vs STNG vs INSW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TK leads in 3 of 6 categories
INSW leads 1 • PXS leads 0 • STNG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — STNG and INSW each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STNG is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 26.6x PXS's $39M. INSW is the more profitable business, keeping 80.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PXS's 5.1%. On growth, STNG holds the edge at +46.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $39M | $993M | $1.0B | $676M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $14M | $334M | $580M | $465M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | $79M | $502M | $546M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $13M | $241M | $389M | $193M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.2% | +28.1% | +51.8% | +40.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.2% | +24.8% | +38.8% | +44.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.1% | +7.9% | +48.4% | +80.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +32.9% | +24.2% | +37.5% | +28.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -12.4% | -29.0% | +46.2% | -91.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +187.0% | -2.4% | +2.5% | +4.8% |
Valuation Metrics
TK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.9x trailing earnings, TK trades at a 58% valuation discount to PXS's 23.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TK's 1.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than INSW's 10.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $47M | $1.2B | $4.4B | $4.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $99M | $565M | $4.3B | $4.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.42x | 9.92x | 12.05x | 14.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 64.05x | 8.58x | 8.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.36x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.00x | 1.23x | 8.68x | 10.48x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.20x | 0.97x | 4.67x | 5.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.46x | 0.68x | 1.30x | 2.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.64x | 3.02x | 8.92x | 117.08x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TK leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INSW delivers a 27.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $2 for PXS. TK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PXS's 0.86x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TK scores 6/9 vs PXS's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.0% | +4.0% | +15.9% | +27.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +3.5% | +12.6% | +20.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.8% | +19.1% | +7.2% | +9.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.3% | +18.1% | +8.4% | +12.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.86x | 0.03x | 0.19x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $52M | -$620M | -$133M | $459M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $36M | $685M | $752M | $117M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $87M | $66M | $619M | $576M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.17x | 69.29x | 6.82x | 0.90x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INSW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in INSW five years ago would be worth $53,809 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,735 for PXS. Over the past 12 months, INSW leads with a +160.2% total return vs PXS's +48.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TK at 51.1% vs PXS's 0.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +61.2% | +59.8% | +71.3% | +96.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +48.8% | +91.5% | +115.3% | +160.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.5% | +244.7% | +92.7% | +179.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +37.3% | +412.3% | +359.0% | +438.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.6% | +97.1% | +62.8% | +1014.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.8% | +51.1% | +24.4% | +40.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TK and STNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
STNG is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INSW's 0.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TK currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs PXS's 90.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.32x | 0.38x | 0.28x | 0.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.92 | $14.22 | $87.39 | $91.58 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.47 | $7.12 | $37.96 | $35.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.4% | +99.1% | +96.9% | +98.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.3 | 60.2 | 60.5 | 67.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 62K | 513K | 1.2M | 597K |
Analyst Outlook
TK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TK as "Buy", STNG as "Buy", INSW as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 0.8% upside for STNG (target: $85) vs -7.6% for INSW (target: $83). For income investors, TK offers the higher dividend yield at 6.47% vs STNG's 1.99%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $85.33 | $83.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 14 | 31 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +6.5% | +2.0% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.91 | $1.69 | $2.92 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | +9.8% | +0.0% | 0.0% |
TK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). INSW leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
PXS vs TK vs STNG vs INSW: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PXS or TK or STNG or INSW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is the stronger pick with -11. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). Teekay Corporation (TK) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (64. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Teekay Corporation (TK) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PXS or TK or STNG or INSW?
On trailing P/E, Teekay Corporation (TK) is the cheapest at 9.
9x versus Pyxis Tankers Inc. at 23. 4x. On forward P/E, International Seaways, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PXS or TK or STNG or INSW?
Over the past 5 years, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) delivered a total return of +438. 1%, compared to +37. 3% for Pyxis Tankers Inc. (PXS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSW returned +1015% versus PXS's -47. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PXS or TK or STNG or INSW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Scorpio Tankers Inc.
(STNG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus International Seaways, Inc. 's 0. 43β — meaning INSW is approximately 53% more volatile than STNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Teekay Corporation (TK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 86% for Pyxis Tankers Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PXS or TK or STNG or INSW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is pulling ahead at -11. 4% versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teekay Corporation grew EPS -7. 8% year-over-year, compared to -79. 1% for Pyxis Tankers Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TK leads at 21. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PXS or TK or STNG or INSW?
Scorpio Tankers Inc.
(STNG) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 7% net margin versus 2. 5% for Pyxis Tankers Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INSW leads at 36. 3% versus 15. 2% for PXS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STNG leads at 46. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PXS or TK or STNG or INSW more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) trades at 8. 5x forward P/E versus 64. 0x for Teekay Corporation — 55. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STNG: 0. 8% to $85. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — PXS or TK or STNG or INSW?
In this comparison, TK (6.
5% yield), INSW (3. 2% yield), STNG (2. 0% yield) pay a dividend. PXS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PXS or TK or STNG or INSW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 43), 3. 2% yield, +1015% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (INSW: +1015%, PXS: -47. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PXS and TK and STNG and INSW?
These companies operate in different sectors (PXS (Industrials) and TK (Energy) and STNG (Energy) and INSW (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PXS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TK is a small-cap deep-value stock; STNG is a small-cap deep-value stock; INSW is a small-cap deep-value stock. TK, STNG, INSW pay a dividend while PXS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.