Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PYPD vs ACRS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
PYPD vs ACRS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $81M | $586M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $8M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-34M | $-65M |
| Gross Margin | — | 73.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | -9.8% |
| Total Debt | $3M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $20M |
PYPD vs ACRS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PolyPid Ltd. (PYPD) | 100 | 0.8 | -99.2% |
| Aclaris Therapeutic… (ACRS) | 100 | 304.3 | +204.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PYPD vs ACRS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PYPD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth and quality.
- -2.9% revenue growth vs ACRS's -58.2%
- -3.1% margin vs ACRS's -8.3%
ACRS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.30
- Rev growth -58.2%, EPS growth 69.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -35.9%
- -76.3% 10Y total return vs PYPD's -99.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -2.9% revenue growth vs ACRS's -58.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | -3.1% margin vs ACRS's -8.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.30 vs PYPD's 1.11 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +288.8% vs PYPD's +57.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -40.5% ROA vs PYPD's -153.2%, ROIC -53.5% vs -5.5% |
PYPD vs ACRS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PYPD vs ACRS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACRS and PYPD operate at a comparable scale, with $8M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $8M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$15M | -$76M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$34M | -$65M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | -$47M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +73.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -9.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -8.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -6.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -85.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +84.2% |
Valuation Metrics
ACRS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $81M | $586M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $77M | $566M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.12x | -9.17x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 74.83x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.61x | 5.78x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACRS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACRS delivers a -63.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-63 in annual profit, vs $-3 for PYPD.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.1% | -63.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -153.2% | -40.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.5% | -53.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.4% | -47.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.25x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | -$20M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $20M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -27.47x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ACRS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACRS five years ago would be worth $2,118 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $168 for PYPD. Over the past 12 months, ACRS leads with a +288.8% total return vs PYPD's +57.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACRS at -16.7% vs PYPD's -29.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.0% | +68.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +57.3% | +288.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -64.3% | -42.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.3% | -78.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.2% | -76.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -29.1% | -16.7% |
Risk & Volatility
ACRS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACRS is the less volatile stock with a 0.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PYPD's 1.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACRS currently trades 99.4% from its 52-week high vs PYPD's 86.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.10x | 0.22x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.12 | $4.89 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.44 | $1.16 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.6% | +99.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.3 | 66.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 51K | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $10.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ACRS leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency.
PYPD vs ACRS: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PYPD or ACRS a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc.
(ACRS) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PYPD or ACRS?
Over the past 5 years, Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc.
(ACRS) delivered a total return of -78. 8%, compared to -98. 3% for PolyPid Ltd. (PYPD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACRS returned -76. 0% versus PYPD's -99. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PYPD or ACRS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc.
(ACRS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 22β versus PolyPid Ltd. 's 1. 10β — meaning PYPD is approximately 401% more volatile than ACRS relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — PYPD or ACRS?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc.
grew EPS 69. 0% year-over-year, compared to 57. 4% for PolyPid Ltd.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — PYPD or ACRS?
PolyPid Ltd.
(PYPD) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -829. 6% for Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PYPD leads at 0. 0% versus -975. 9% for ACRS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACRS leads at 73. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — PYPD or ACRS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is PYPD or ACRS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc.
(ACRS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 22)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ACRS: -76. 0%, PYPD: -99. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between PYPD and ACRS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.