Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PYPL vs V
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
PYPL vs V — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $42.76B | $617.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $33.17B | $40.00B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5.06B | $22.24B |
| Gross Margin | 46.6% | 80.4% |
| Operating Margin | 18.3% | 60.0% |
| Forward P/E | 8.8x | 24.6x |
| Total Debt | $9.99B | $25.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8.05B | $20.15B |
PYPL vs V — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PayPal Holdings, In… (PYPL) | 100 | 30.0 | -70.0% |
| Visa Inc. (V) | 100 | 168.9 | +68.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PYPL vs V
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PYPL is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.39, Low D/E 49.3%, current ratio 1.29x
- PEG 0.99 vs V's 1.56
- Lower P/E (8.8x vs 24.6x), PEG 0.99 vs 1.56
V carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.68, yield 0.7%
- Rev growth 11.3%, EPS growth 4.8%
- 334.8% 10Y total return vs PYPL's 20.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.3% NII/revenue growth vs PYPL's 4.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.8x vs 24.6x), PEG 0.99 vs 1.56 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs PYPL's 0.3% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.68 vs PYPL's 1.39 | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs PYPL's 0.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -6.9% vs PYPL's -31.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs PYPL's 0.3% |
PYPL vs V — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PYPL vs V — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
V leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
V and PYPL operate at a comparable scale, with $40.0B and $33.2B in trailing revenue. V is the more profitable business, keeping 50.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PYPL's 15.8%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $33.2B | $40.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $6.7B | $27.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5.1B | $22.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $5.5B | $21.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +46.6% | +80.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.3% | +60.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.8% | +50.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.8% | +53.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.2% | +35.3% |
Valuation Metrics
PYPL leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.6x trailing earnings, PYPL trades at a 73% valuation discount to V's 31.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PYPL offers better value at 0.97x vs V's 1.99x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $42.8B | $617.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $44.7B | $622.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.59x | 31.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.75x | 24.65x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.97x | 1.99x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.36x | 24.70x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.29x | 15.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.22x | 16.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.69x | 28.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
V leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
V delivers a 58.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $59 in annual profit, vs $25 for PYPL. PYPL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to V's 0.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PYPL scores 8/9 vs V's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +25.1% | +58.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.3% | +22.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.0% | +29.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +18.1% | +36.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.49x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.9B | $5.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8.0B | $20.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10.0B | $25.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 19.28x | 26.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
V leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in V five years ago would be worth $14,474 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,890 for PYPL. Over the past 12 months, V leads with a -6.9% total return vs PYPL's -31.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors V at 12.4% vs PYPL's -14.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.8% | -6.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -31.8% | -6.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.6% | +41.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.1% | +44.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.1% | +334.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -14.6% | +12.4% |
Risk & Volatility
V leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
V is the less volatile stock with a 0.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PYPL's 1.39 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. V currently trades 85.8% from its 52-week high vs PYPL's 58.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.39x | 0.68x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $79.50 | $375.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $38.46 | $293.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +58.5% | +85.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.9 | 62.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 16.8M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
V leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PYPL as "Hold" and V as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 12.6% upside for V (target: $362) vs 11.2% for PYPL (target: $52). For income investors, V offers the higher dividend yield at 0.73% vs PYPL's 0.29%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $51.67 | $362.45 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 70 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.13 | $2.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +14.2% | +2.2% |
V leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PYPL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
PYPL vs V: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PYPL or V a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Visa Inc.
(V) is the stronger pick with 11. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 3% for PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) offers the better valuation at 8. 6x trailing P/E (8. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Visa Inc. (V) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PYPL or V?
On trailing P/E, PayPal Holdings, Inc.
(PYPL) is the cheapest at 8. 6x versus Visa Inc. at 31. 6x. On forward P/E, PayPal Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: PayPal Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 99x versus Visa Inc. 's 1. 56x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PYPL or V?
Over the past 5 years, Visa Inc.
(V) delivered a total return of +44. 7%, compared to -81. 1% for PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: V returned +334. 8% versus PYPL's +20. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PYPL or V?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Visa Inc.
(V) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 68β versus PayPal Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 39β — meaning PYPL is approximately 105% more volatile than V relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 66% for Visa Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PYPL or V?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Visa Inc.
(V) is pulling ahead at 11. 3% versus 4. 3% for PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PayPal Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 35. 6% year-over-year, compared to 4. 8% for Visa Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PYPL or V?
Visa Inc.
(V) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 1% net margin versus 15. 8% for PayPal Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 50. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: V leads at 60. 0% versus 18. 3% for PYPL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — V leads at 80. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PYPL or V more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 99x versus Visa Inc. 's 1. 56x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) trades at 8. 8x forward P/E versus 24. 6x for Visa Inc. — 15. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for V: 12. 6% to $362. 45.
08Which pays a better dividend — PYPL or V?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Visa Inc. (V) offers the highest yield at 0. 7%, versus 0. 3% for PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL).
09Is PYPL or V better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Visa Inc.
(V) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 68), 0. 7% yield, +334. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (V: +334. 8%, PYPL: +20. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PYPL and V?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PYPL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; V is a large-cap quality compounder stock. V pays a dividend while PYPL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.