Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
PYXS logo
PYXS
MRK logo
MRK
PFE logo
PFE
BMY logo
BMY
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PYXS vs MRK vs PFE vs BMY

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PYXS
Pyxis Oncology, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$106M
5Y Perf.-87.5%
MRK
Merck & Co., Inc.

Drug Manufacturers - General

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$298.30B
5Y Perf.+37.2%
PFE
Pfizer Inc.

Drug Manufacturers - General

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$148.89B
5Y Perf.-40.2%
BMY
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company

Drug Manufacturers - General

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$116.17B
5Y Perf.-2.6%

PYXS vs MRK vs PFE vs BMY — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PYXS logoPYXS
MRK logoMRK
PFE logoPFE
BMY logoBMY
IndustryBiotechnologyDrug Manufacturers - GeneralDrug Manufacturers - GeneralDrug Manufacturers - General
Market Cap$106M$298.30B$148.89B$116.17B
Revenue (TTM)$14M$64.93B$63.31B$48.48B
Net Income (TTM)$-82M$18.25B$7.49B$7.28B
Gross Margin99.8%74.2%69.3%68.7%
Operating Margin-6.2%41.1%23.4%25.7%
Forward P/E23.5x8.8x9.0x
Total Debt$19M$50.53B$67.42B$47.14B
Cash & Equiv.$15M$14.56B$1.14B$10.21B

PYXS vs MRK vs PFE vs BMYLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PYXS
MRK
PFE
BMY
StockOct 21Jun 26Return
Pyxis Oncology, Inc. (PYXS)10012.5-87.5%
Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK)100137.2+37.2%
Pfizer Inc. (PFE)10059.8-40.2%
Bristol-Myers Squib… (BMY)10097.4-2.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PYXS vs MRK vs PFE vs BMY

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MRK leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Pfizer Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. BMY also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇MRK emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
PYXS
Pyxis Oncology, Inc.
The Secondary Option

PYXS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
MRK
Merck & Co., Inc.
The Growth Play

MRK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 1.2%, EPS growth 8.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.1%
  • 172.8% 10Y total return vs PFE's 25.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.34, Low D/E 96.0%, current ratio 1.54x
  • 1.2% revenue growth vs PYXS's -14.2%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
PFE
Pfizer Inc.
The Income Pick

PFE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.37, yield 6.6%
  • Lower P/E (8.8x vs 23.5x)
  • 6.6% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs MRK's 2.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: income & stability
BMY
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
The Defensive Pick

BMY is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.

  • Beta 0.33, yield 4.3%, current ratio 1.26x
  • Beta 0.33 vs PYXS's 1.50
Best for: defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMRK logoMRK1.2% revenue growth vs PYXS's -14.2%
ValuePFE logoPFELower P/E (8.8x vs 23.5x)
Quality / MarginsMRK logoMRK28.1% margin vs PYXS's -5.9%
Stability / SafetyBMY logoBMYBeta 0.33 vs PYXS's 1.50
DividendsPFE logoPFE6.6% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs MRK's 2.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)MRK logoMRK+54.5% vs PFE's +14.0%
Efficiency (ROA)MRK logoMRK14.6% ROA vs PYXS's -85.0%, ROIC 22.0% vs -71.1%

PYXS vs MRK vs PFE vs BMY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Biotech & Healthcare Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Biotech & Healthcare Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
PYXSPyxis Oncology, Inc.
FY 2025
Milestone Revenue
100.0%$3M
MRKMerck & Co., Inc.
FY 2025
Pharmaceutical segment
89.4%$58.1B
Animal Health segment
9.8%$6.4B
Other Segments
0.8%$515M
PFEPfizer Inc.
FY 2025
Biopharma Segment
97.8%$61.2B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
2.2%$1.4B
BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Company
FY 2025
Eliquis
30.0%$14.4B
Opdivo
20.9%$10.0B
Orencia
7.7%$3.7B
Revlimid
6.1%$3.0B
Yervoy
6.0%$2.9B
Pomalyst/Imnovid
5.7%$2.7B
Reblozyl
4.8%$2.3B
Other (13)
18.9%$9.1B

PYXS vs MRK vs PFE vs BMY — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMRKLAGGINGBMY

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — MRK and BMY each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

MRK is the larger business by revenue, generating $64.9B annually — 4685.1x PYXS's $14M. MRK is the more profitable business, keeping 28.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PYXS's -5.9%.

MetricPYXS logoPYXSPyxis Oncology, I…MRK logoMRKMerck & Co., Inc.PFE logoPFEPfizer Inc.BMY logoBMYBristol-Myers Squ…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$14M$64.9B$63.3B$48.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$81M$32.4B$21.0B$15.7B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$82M$18.3B$7.5B$7.3B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$67M$12.4B$9.5B$11.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+99.8%+74.2%+69.3%+68.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-6.2%+41.1%+23.4%+25.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-5.9%+28.1%+11.8%+15.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-4.8%+19.0%+15.0%+24.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.5%+5.4%+2.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-5.7%-19.6%-9.5%+9.2%
Evenly matched — MRK and BMY each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PFE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 16.5x trailing earnings, BMY trades at a 14% valuation discount to PFE's 19.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BMY's 9.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MRK's 11.4x.

MetricPYXS logoPYXSPyxis Oncology, I…MRK logoMRKMerck & Co., Inc.PFE logoPFEPfizer Inc.BMY logoBMYBristol-Myers Squ…
Market CapShares × price$106M$298.3B$148.9B$116.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$109M$334.3B$215.2B$153.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1.30x16.59x19.25x16.49x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.23.50x8.84x9.01x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.78x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.40x10.58x9.25x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue7.63x4.59x2.38x2.41x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.94x5.75x1.72x6.28x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF24.13x16.41x9.04x
PFE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MRK leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

BMY delivers a 39.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $-136 for PYXS. PYXS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BMY's 2.55x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BMY scores 8/9 vs PYXS's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricPYXS logoPYXSPyxis Oncology, I…MRK logoMRKMerck & Co., Inc.PFE logoPFEPfizer Inc.BMY logoBMYBristol-Myers Squ…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-135.6%+36.1%+8.3%+39.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-85.0%+14.6%+3.6%+7.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital-71.1%+22.0%+7.5%+16.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-80.4%+23.8%+9.0%+18.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–92478
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.35x0.96x0.78x2.55x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$3M$36.0B$66.3B$36.9B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$15M$14.6B$1.1B$10.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$19M$50.5B$67.4B$47.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense19.68x4.02x10.33x
MRK leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MRK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MRK five years ago would be worth $17,802 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,265 for PYXS. Over the past 12 months, MRK leads with a +54.5% total return vs PFE's +14.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MRK at 5.8% vs PYXS's -17.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPYXS logoPYXSPyxis Oncology, I…MRK logoMRKMerck & Co., Inc.PFE logoPFEPfizer Inc.BMY logoBMYBristol-Myers Squ…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+45.2%+14.3%+7.4%+8.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+30.5%+54.5%+14.0%+18.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-44.7%+18.6%-21.7%-0.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-87.3%+78.0%-14.2%+1.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-87.3%+172.8%+25.7%+6.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-17.9%+5.8%-7.8%-0.3%
MRK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MRK and BMY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

BMY is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PYXS's 1.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MRK currently trades 96.5% from its 52-week high vs PYXS's 30.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPYXS logoPYXSPyxis Oncology, I…MRK logoMRKMerck & Co., Inc.PFE logoPFEPfizer Inc.BMY logoBMYBristol-Myers Squ…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.50x0.34x0.37x0.33x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$5.55$125.14$28.75$62.89
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.97$76.66$23.11$42.52
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+30.1%+96.5%+91.1%+90.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10042.055.443.744.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded528K7.1M28.2M9.0M
Evenly matched — MRK and BMY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

PFE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: PYXS as "Buy", MRK as "Buy", PFE as "Hold", BMY as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 229.3% upside for PYXS (target: $6) vs 3.2% for PFE (target: $27). For income investors, PFE offers the higher dividend yield at 6.57% vs MRK's 2.70%.

MetricPYXS logoPYXSPyxis Oncology, I…MRK logoMRKMerck & Co., Inc.PFE logoPFEPfizer Inc.BMY logoBMYBristol-Myers Squ…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$5.50$130.69$27.00$61.73
# AnalystsCovering analysts9373941
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.7%+6.6%+4.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises15154
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$3.26$1.72$2.47
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.7%0.0%0.0%
PFE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

PFE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). MRK leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallMerck & Co., Inc. (MRK)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PYXS vs MRK vs PFE vs BMY: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PYXS or MRK or PFE or BMY a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Merck & Co.

, Inc. (MRK) is the stronger pick with 1. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 2% for Pyxis Oncology, Inc. (PYXS). Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) offers the better valuation at 16. 5x trailing P/E (9. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pyxis Oncology, Inc. (PYXS) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PYXS or MRK or PFE or BMY?

On trailing P/E, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) is the cheapest at 16.

5x versus Pfizer Inc. at 19. 2x. On forward P/E, Pfizer Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PYXS or MRK or PFE or BMY?

Over the past 5 years, Merck & Co.

, Inc. (MRK) delivered a total return of +78. 0%, compared to -87. 3% for Pyxis Oncology, Inc. (PYXS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MRK returned +172. 8% versus PYXS's -87. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PYXS or MRK or PFE or BMY?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

33β versus Pyxis Oncology, Inc. 's 1. 50β — meaning PYXS is approximately 358% more volatile than BMY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pyxis Oncology, Inc. (PYXS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 3% for Bristol-Myers Squibb Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PYXS or MRK or PFE or BMY?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Merck & Co.

, Inc. (MRK) is pulling ahead at 1. 2% versus -14. 2% for Pyxis Oncology, Inc. (PYXS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company grew EPS 178. 2% year-over-year, compared to -3. 5% for Pfizer Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MRK leads at 3. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PYXS or MRK or PFE or BMY?

Merck & Co.

, Inc. (MRK) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 1% net margin versus -574. 5% for Pyxis Oncology, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MRK leads at 36. 2% versus -609. 2% for PYXS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PYXS leads at 82. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PYXS or MRK or PFE or BMY more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Pfizer Inc.

(PFE) trades at 8. 8x forward P/E versus 23. 5x for Merck & Co. , Inc. — 14. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PYXS: 229. 3% to $5. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PYXS or MRK or PFE or BMY?

In this comparison, PFE (6.

6% yield), BMY (4. 3% yield), MRK (2. 7% yield) pay a dividend. PYXS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is PYXS or MRK or PFE or BMY better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Merck & Co.

, Inc. (MRK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 34), 2. 7% yield, +172. 8% 10Y return). Pyxis Oncology, Inc. (PYXS) carries a higher beta of 1. 50 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MRK: +172. 8%, PYXS: -87. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PYXS and MRK and PFE and BMY?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: PYXS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MRK is a large-cap deep-value stock; PFE is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; BMY is a mid-cap deep-value stock. MRK, PFE, BMY pay a dividend while PYXS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.