Gold
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PZG vs EXK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Other Precious Metals
PZG vs EXK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gold | Other Precious Metals |
| Market Cap | $117M | $2.74B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $330M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $-94M |
| Gross Margin | — | 9.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | -1.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 13.2x |
| Total Debt | $12M | $120M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $106M |
PZG vs EXK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paramount Gold Neva… (PZG) | 100 | 132.1 | +32.1% |
| Endeavour Silver Co… (EXK) | 100 | 484.9 | +384.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PZG vs EXK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PZG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.54
- EPS growth 0.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.54, Low D/E 34.6%, current ratio 4.10x
EXK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 138.7% 10Y total return vs PZG's -8.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 169.0% revenue growth vs EXK's 5.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | -3.1% margin vs EXK's -28.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.54 vs EXK's 1.71 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +206.9% vs EXK's +155.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.1% ROA vs EXK's -9.2%, ROIC -11.9% vs 1.5% |
PZG vs EXK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PZG vs EXK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PZG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EXK and PZG operate at a comparable scale, with $330M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $330M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | $49M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3M | -$94M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | -$129M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +9.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -1.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -28.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -39.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +154.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.0% | -97.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PZG and EXK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $117M | $2.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $128M | $2.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -11.38x | -71.62x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.15x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 69.76x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 12.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.99x | 4.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
PZG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PZG delivers a 11.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-18 for EXK. EXK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.25x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PZG's 0.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EXK scores 4/9 vs PZG's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.6% | -18.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.1% | -9.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -11.9% | +1.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -13.0% | +1.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.35x | 0.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $10M | $14M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $106M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12M | $120M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.10x | -39.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PZG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EXK five years ago would be worth $14,848 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,095 for PZG. Over the past 12 months, PZG leads with a +206.9% total return vs EXK's +155.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PZG at 62.4% vs EXK's 30.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.4% | +3.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +206.9% | +155.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +328.5% | +123.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +41.0% | +48.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.1% | +138.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +62.4% | +30.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PZG and EXK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PZG is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EXK's 1.71 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EXK currently trades 61.5% from its 52-week high vs PZG's 54.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.54x | 1.71x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.71 | $15.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.43 | $3.14 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +54.6% | +61.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 31.8 | 37.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 878K | 9.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PZG as "Buy" and EXK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 119.6% upside for PZG (target: $3) vs 36.9% for EXK (target: $13).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.25 | $12.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
PZG leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
PZG vs EXK: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PZG or EXK a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.
(PZG) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PZG or EXK?
Over the past 5 years, Endeavour Silver Corp.
(EXK) delivered a total return of +48. 5%, compared to +41. 0% for Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. (PZG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXK returned +138. 7% versus PZG's -8. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PZG or EXK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.
(PZG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 54β versus Endeavour Silver Corp. 's 1. 71β — meaning EXK is approximately 218% more volatile than PZG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 35% for Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — PZG or EXK?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.
grew EPS 0. 0% year-over-year, compared to -519. 4% for Endeavour Silver Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — PZG or EXK?
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.
(PZG) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -14. 5% for Endeavour Silver Corp. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EXK leads at 3. 8% versus 0. 0% for PZG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EXK leads at 19. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is PZG or EXK more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PZG: 119.
6% to $3. 25.
07Which pays a better dividend — PZG or EXK?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is PZG or EXK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.
(PZG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 54)). Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK) carries a higher beta of 1. 71 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PZG: -8. 1%, EXK: +138. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between PZG and EXK?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.