Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PZG vs GORO vs EXK vs MUX vs AG

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.

Gold

Basic MaterialsAMEX • US
Market Cap$116M
5Y Perf.+28.6%
GORO
Gold Resource Corporation

Gold

Basic MaterialsAMEX • US
Market Cap$231M
5Y Perf.-66.4%
EXK
Endeavour Silver Corp.

Other Precious Metals

Basic MaterialsNYSE • CA
Market Cap$2.99B
5Y Perf.+380.7%
MUX
McEwen Mining Inc.

Other Precious Metals

Basic MaterialsNYSE • CA
Market Cap$1.39B
5Y Perf.+139.9%
AG
First Majestic Silver Corp.

Silver

Basic MaterialsNYSE • CA
Market Cap$10.55B
5Y Perf.+118.4%

PZG vs GORO vs EXK vs MUX vs AG — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PZG logoPZG
GORO logoGORO
EXK logoEXK
MUX logoMUX
AG logoAG
IndustryGoldGoldOther Precious MetalsOther Precious MetalsSilver
Market Cap$116M$231M$2.99B$1.39B$10.55B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$93M$330M$162M$1.27B
Net Income (TTM)$3M$-6M$-94M$74M$174M
Gross Margin18.9%9.3%32.9%35.5%
Operating Margin13.1%-1.7%22.2%29.0%
Forward P/E28.6x14.3x22.2x20.4x
Total Debt$12M$91M$120M$926K$314M
Cash & Equiv.$1M$25M$106M$51M$792M

PZG vs GORO vs EXK vs MUX vs AGLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PZG
GORO
EXK
MUX
AG
StockMay 20May 26Return
Paramount Gold Neva… (PZG)100128.6+28.6%
Gold Resource Corpo… (GORO)10033.6-66.4%
Endeavour Silver Co… (EXK)100480.7+380.7%
McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX)100239.9+139.9%
First Majestic Silv… (AG)100218.4+118.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PZG vs GORO vs EXK vs MUX vs AG

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MUX leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. GORO, EXK, and AG also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.
The Defensive Pick

PZG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.54, Low D/E 34.6%, current ratio 4.10x
  • 169.0% revenue growth vs EXK's 5.9%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
GORO
Gold Resource Corporation
The Defensive Pick

GORO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.

  • Beta 0.38, current ratio 2.85x
  • Beta 0.38 vs EXK's 1.71
Best for: defensive
EXK
Endeavour Silver Corp.
The Long-Run Compounder

EXK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 182.7% 10Y total return vs MUX's -0.1%
  • Lower P/E (14.3x vs 22.2x)
Best for: long-term compounding
MUX
McEwen Mining Inc.
The Income Pick

MUX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.27, yield 0.2%
  • 45.7% margin vs EXK's -28.4%
  • 0.2% yield, vs AG's 0.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
  • 9.0% ROA vs EXK's -9.2%, ROIC -1.9% vs 1.5%
Best for: income & stability
AG
First Majestic Silver Corp.
The Growth Play

AG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 128.2%, EPS growth 202.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.8%
  • +241.7% vs GORO's +143.4%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthPZG logoPZG169.0% revenue growth vs EXK's 5.9%
ValueEXK logoEXKLower P/E (14.3x vs 22.2x)
Quality / MarginsMUX logoMUX45.7% margin vs EXK's -28.4%
Stability / SafetyGORO logoGOROBeta 0.38 vs EXK's 1.71
DividendsMUX logoMUX0.2% yield, vs AG's 0.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)AG logoAG+241.7% vs GORO's +143.4%
Efficiency (ROA)MUX logoMUX9.0% ROA vs EXK's -9.2%, ROIC -1.9% vs 1.5%

PZG vs GORO vs EXK vs MUX vs AG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PZGParamount Gold Nevada Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

GOROGold Resource Corporation
FY 2025
Concentrate
48.4%$92M
Silver Concentrate
34.8%$66M
Gold Concentrate
8.7%$17M
Zinc Concentrate
4.4%$8M
Copper Concentrate
1.3%$2M
Lead Concentrate
1.0%$2M
Dore
0.7%$1M
Other (2)
0.7%$1M
EXKEndeavour Silver Corp.
FY 2024
Concentrate Sales
101.1%$71M
Provisional Pricing Adjustments
-1.1%$-776,000
MUXMcEwen Mining Inc.
FY 2025
United States Reportable Segment
59.1%$117M
Canada Reportable Segment
38.5%$76M
Mexico Reportable Segment
2.4%$5M
AGFirst Majestic Silver Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

PZG vs GORO vs EXK vs MUX vs AG — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLPZGLAGGINGMUX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

AG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

AG and PZG operate at a comparable scale, with $1.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. MUX is the more profitable business, keeping 45.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EXK's -28.4%. On growth, GORO holds the edge at +2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricPZG logoPZGParamount Gold Ne…GORO logoGOROGold Resource Cor…EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …MUX logoMUXMcEwen Mining Inc.AG logoAGFirst Majestic Si…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$93M$330M$162M$1.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$6M$25M$49M$61M$636M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$3M-$6M-$94M$74M$174M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$4M-$4M-$129M-$24M$351M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+18.9%+9.3%+32.9%+35.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+13.1%-1.7%+22.2%+29.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-6.9%-28.4%+45.7%+13.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-4.2%-39.1%-14.7%+27.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.5%+154.0%-100.0%+171.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+3.0%+193.3%-97.5%+4.9%+4.8%
AG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — GORO and EXK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 39.6x trailing earnings, MUX trades at a 35% valuation discount to AG's 61.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GORO's 11.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than EXK's 76.0x.

MetricPZG logoPZGParamount Gold Ne…GORO logoGOROGold Resource Cor…EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …MUX logoMUXMcEwen Mining Inc.AG logoAGFirst Majestic Si…
Market CapShares × price$116M$231M$3.0B$1.4B$10.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$126M$297M$3.0B$1.3B$10.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-11.23x-30.43x-78.08x39.61x61.06x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.28.60x14.34x22.21x20.39x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.34x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.93x76.02x74.65x15.82x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.48x13.72x7.03x8.25x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.95x4.46x5.07x2.31x3.27x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF359.20x30.01x
Evenly matched — GORO and EXK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — MUX and AG each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

MUX delivers a 13.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-23 for GORO. MUX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GORO's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GORO scores 7/9 vs PZG's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricPZG logoPZGParamount Gold Ne…GORO logoGOROGold Resource Cor…EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …MUX logoMUXMcEwen Mining Inc.AG logoAGFirst Majestic Si…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+11.6%-22.7%-18.4%+13.6%+5.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+6.1%-4.0%-9.2%+9.0%+4.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-11.9%+13.5%+1.5%-1.9%+13.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-13.0%+8.2%+1.6%-1.9%+11.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–917457
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.35x2.07x0.25x0.00x0.10x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$10M$66M$14M-$50M-$478M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1M$25M$106M$51M$792M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$12M$91M$120M$926,000$314M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.10x0.73x-39.17x-1.52x20.24x
Evenly matched — MUX and AG each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PZG leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MUX five years ago would be worth $17,977 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,415 for GORO. Over the past 12 months, AG leads with a +241.7% total return vs GORO's +143.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PZG at 61.7% vs GORO's 14.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPZG logoPZGParamount Gold Ne…GORO logoGOROGold Resource Cor…EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …MUX logoMUXMcEwen Mining Inc.AG logoAGFirst Majestic Si…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+22.7%+70.2%+12.5%+25.1%+33.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+207.4%+143.4%+193.4%+198.5%+241.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+322.7%+50.5%+144.0%+163.5%+212.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+39.0%-45.8%+61.1%+79.8%+31.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-7.0%-47.8%+182.7%-0.1%+128.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+61.7%+14.6%+34.6%+38.1%+46.3%
PZG leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — GORO and MUX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

GORO is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EXK's 1.71 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MUX currently trades 78.7% from its 52-week high vs PZG's 53.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPZG logoPZGParamount Gold Ne…GORO logoGOROGold Resource Cor…EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …MUX logoMUXMcEwen Mining Inc.AG logoAGFirst Majestic Si…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.54x0.38x1.71x1.27x1.56x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.71$1.87$15.15$29.70$32.03
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.43$0.43$3.14$6.88$5.49
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+53.9%+76.5%+67.0%+78.7%+66.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10040.847.947.651.052.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded857K1.8M9.4M992K16.9M
Evenly matched — GORO and MUX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — MUX and AG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: PZG as "Buy", GORO as "Buy", EXK as "Buy", MUX as "Buy", AG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 122.6% upside for PZG (target: $3) vs 24.0% for AG (target: $27). MUX is the only dividend payer here at 0.18% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricPZG logoPZGParamount Gold Ne…GORO logoGOROGold Resource Cor…EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …MUX logoMUXMcEwen Mining Inc.AG logoAGFirst Majestic Si…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$3.25$2.00$12.75$30.00$26.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts3414711
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.2%+0.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0001
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.04$0.02
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.1%
Evenly matched — MUX and AG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

AG leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). PZG leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.

Best OverallParamount Gold Nevada Corp. (PZG)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PZG vs GORO vs EXK vs MUX vs AG: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PZG or GORO or EXK or MUX or AG a better buy right now?

For growth investors, First Majestic Silver Corp.

(AG) is the stronger pick with 128. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 9% for Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK). McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX) offers the better valuation at 39. 6x trailing P/E (22. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. (PZG) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PZG or GORO or EXK or MUX or AG?

On trailing P/E, McEwen Mining Inc.

(MUX) is the cheapest at 39. 6x versus First Majestic Silver Corp. at 61. 1x. On forward P/E, Endeavour Silver Corp. is actually cheaper at 14. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PZG or GORO or EXK or MUX or AG?

Over the past 5 years, McEwen Mining Inc.

(MUX) delivered a total return of +79. 8%, compared to -45. 8% for Gold Resource Corporation (GORO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXK returned +182. 7% versus GORO's -47. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PZG or GORO or EXK or MUX or AG?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gold Resource Corporation (GORO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

38β versus Endeavour Silver Corp. 's 1. 71β — meaning EXK is approximately 355% more volatile than GORO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for Gold Resource Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PZG or GORO or EXK or MUX or AG?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Majestic Silver Corp.

(AG) is pulling ahead at 128. 2% versus 5. 9% for Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Majestic Silver Corp. grew EPS 202. 9% year-over-year, compared to -519. 4% for Endeavour Silver Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AG leads at 26. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PZG or GORO or EXK or MUX or AG?

McEwen Mining Inc.

(MUX) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 4% net margin versus -14. 5% for Endeavour Silver Corp. — meaning it keeps 17. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AG leads at 27. 8% versus -6. 5% for MUX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AG leads at 34. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PZG or GORO or EXK or MUX or AG more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Endeavour Silver Corp.

(EXK) trades at 14. 3x forward P/E versus 28. 6x for Gold Resource Corporation — 14. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PZG: 122. 6% to $3. 25.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PZG or GORO or EXK or MUX or AG?

In this comparison, MUX (0.

2% yield) pays a dividend. PZG, GORO, EXK, AG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is PZG or GORO or EXK or MUX or AG better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Gold Resource Corporation (GORO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

38)). Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK) carries a higher beta of 1. 71 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GORO: -47. 8%, EXK: +182. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PZG and GORO and EXK and MUX and AG?

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: PZG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GORO is a small-cap high-growth stock; EXK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MUX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AG is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

PZG

Quality Business

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GORO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 122%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

EXK

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 77%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MUX

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 27%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AG

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 85%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.