Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
Q vs SNX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Technology Distributors
Q vs SNX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Technology Distributors |
| Market Cap | $30.08B | $18.77B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.33B | $62.51B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $693M | $828M |
| Gross Margin | 46.1% | 6.5% |
| Operating Margin | 19.5% | 2.4% |
| Forward P/E | 37.7x | 13.9x |
| Total Debt | $191M | $4.61B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $166M | $2.44B |
Quick Verdict: Q vs SNX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Q is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 7.4%, EPS growth 36.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.65, Low D/E 1.8%, current ratio 1.77x
- 7.4% revenue growth vs SNX's 6.9%
SNX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.43, yield 0.8%
- 5.0% 10Y total return vs Q's 50.8%
- Beta 1.43, yield 0.8%, current ratio 1.21x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.4% revenue growth vs SNX's 6.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.9x vs 37.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.0% margin vs SNX's 1.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.43 vs Q's 2.65 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +103.2% vs Q's +50.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.6% ROA vs SNX's 2.4%, ROIC 5.7% vs 9.9% |
Q vs SNX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Q vs SNX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Q leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SNX is the larger business by revenue, generating $62.5B annually — 14.4x Q's $4.3B. Q is the more profitable business, keeping 16.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SNX's 1.3%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.3B | $62.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $1.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $828M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $1.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +46.1% | +6.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.5% | +2.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.0% | +1.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.9% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +9.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +32.8% |
Valuation Metrics
SNX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.4x trailing earnings, SNX trades at a 46% valuation discount to Q's 43.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SNX's 11.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than Q's 24.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $30.1B | $18.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $30.1B | $20.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 43.40x | 23.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 37.67x | 13.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 24.26x | 11.40x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.94x | 0.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.76x | 2.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 34.93x | 13.51x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Q leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SNX delivers a 9.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $6 for Q. Q carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SNX's 0.55x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), Q scores 8/9 vs SNX's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.3% | +9.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.6% | +2.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.7% | +9.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.3% | +10.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.55x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $25M | $2.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $166M | $2.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $191M | $4.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.02x | 3.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SNX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SNX five years ago would be worth $19,416 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,083 for Q. Over the past 12 months, SNX leads with a +103.2% total return vs Q's +50.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SNX at 39.3% vs Q's 14.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +69.1% | +52.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +50.8% | +103.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.8% | +170.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.8% | +94.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.8% | +505.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.7% | +39.3% |
Risk & Volatility
SNX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SNX is the less volatile stock with a 1.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than Q's 2.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SNX currently trades 97.9% from its 52-week high vs Q's 94.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.65x | 1.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $151.36 | $237.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $70.50 | $114.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.9% | +97.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.2 | 80.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.9M | 735K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates Q as "Buy" and SNX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -13.0% upside for Q (target: $125) vs -23.9% for SNX (target: $177). SNX is the only dividend payer here at 0.76% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $125.00 | $177.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.78 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.3% |
SNX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). Q leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency).
Q vs SNX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is Q or SNX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Qnity Electronics, Inc.
(Q) is the stronger pick with 7. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 9% for TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX). TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) offers the better valuation at 23. 4x trailing P/E (13. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Qnity Electronics, Inc. (Q) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — Q or SNX?
On trailing P/E, TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) is the cheapest at 23.
4x versus Qnity Electronics, Inc. at 43. 4x. On forward P/E, TD SYNNEX Corporation is actually cheaper at 13. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — Q or SNX?
Over the past 5 years, TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) delivered a total return of +94.
2%, compared to +50. 8% for Qnity Electronics, Inc. (Q). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SNX returned +505. 0% versus Q's +50. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — Q or SNX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
43β versus Qnity Electronics, Inc. 's 2. 65β — meaning Q is approximately 85% more volatile than SNX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Qnity Electronics, Inc. (Q) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 55% for TD SYNNEX Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — Q or SNX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Qnity Electronics, Inc.
(Q) is pulling ahead at 7. 4% versus 6. 9% for TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Qnity Electronics, Inc. grew EPS 36. 7% year-over-year, compared to 25. 2% for TD SYNNEX Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — Q or SNX?
Qnity Electronics, Inc.
(Q) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 0% net margin versus 1. 3% for TD SYNNEX Corporation — meaning it keeps 16. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: Q leads at 19. 5% versus 2. 3% for SNX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — Q leads at 46. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is Q or SNX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) trades at 13.
9x forward P/E versus 37. 7x for Qnity Electronics, Inc. — 23. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for Q: -13. 0% to $125. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — Q or SNX?
In this comparison, SNX (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. Q does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is Q or SNX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.
8% yield, +505. 0% 10Y return). Qnity Electronics, Inc. (Q) carries a higher beta of 2. 65 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SNX: +505. 0%, Q: +50. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between Q and SNX?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
SNX pays a dividend while Q does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.