QDEL vs BIO vs TMO vs HOLX

For growth investors, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.

(TMO) is the stronger pick with 3. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 9% for QuidelOrtho Corporation (QDEL). Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. (BIO) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E (25. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate QuidelOrtho Corporation (QDEL) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.

(BIO) is the cheapest at 9. 2x versus Hologic, Inc. at 30. 5x. On forward P/E, QuidelOrtho Corporation is actually cheaper at 6. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Hologic, Inc.

(HOLX) delivered a total return of +15. 8%, compared to -91. 1% for QuidelOrtho Corporation (QDEL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TMO returned +229. 1% versus QDEL's -34. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hologic, Inc.

(HOLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 41β versus QuidelOrtho Corporation's 2. 59β — meaning QDEL is approximately 530% more volatile than HOLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. (BIO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 146% for QuidelOrtho Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.

(TMO) is pulling ahead at 3. 9% versus -1. 9% for QuidelOrtho Corporation (QDEL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. grew EPS 142. 6% year-over-year, compared to -25. 0% for Hologic, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TMO leads at -0. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.

(BIO) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 4% net margin versus -41. 5% for QuidelOrtho Corporation — meaning it keeps 29. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TMO leads at 18. 2% versus -33. 7% for QDEL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HOLX leads at 61. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, QuidelOrtho Corporation (QDEL) trades at 6.

4x forward P/E versus 25. 0x for Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. — 18. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for QDEL: 57. 8% to $17. 00.

In this comparison, TMO (0.

4% yield) pays a dividend. QDEL, BIO, HOLX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Hologic, Inc.

(HOLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 41), +124. 3% 10Y return). QuidelOrtho Corporation (QDEL) carries a higher beta of 2. 59 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HOLX: +124. 3%, QDEL: -34. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: QDEL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BIO is a small-cap deep-value stock; TMO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; HOLX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.