Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
QIPT vs EHAB vs ADUS vs SGRY vs ACHC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Care Facilities
Medical - Care Facilities
Medical - Care Facilities
Medical - Care Facilities
QIPT vs EHAB vs ADUS vs SGRY vs ACHC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Care Facilities |
| Market Cap | $161M | $706M | $1.86B | $1.89B | $2.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $287M | $1.06B | $1.45B | $3.34B | $3.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $-3M | $100M | $-76M | $-1.11B |
| Gross Margin | 84.5% | 36.1% | 32.5% | 22.8% | 56.2% |
| Operating Margin | -0.8% | 7.2% | 9.8% | 11.8% | 11.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 22.9x | 14.3x | 37.4x | 16.7x |
| Total Debt | $119M | $500M | $209M | $4.02B | $2.65B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $13M | $44M | $82M | $240M | $133M |
QIPT vs EHAB vs ADUS vs SGRY vs ACHC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 22 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quipt Home Medical … (QIPT) | 100 | 79.0 | -21.0% |
| Enhabit, Inc. (EHAB) | 100 | 59.3 | -40.7% |
| Addus HomeCare Corp… (ADUS) | 100 | 124.3 | +24.3% |
| Surgery Partners, I… (SGRY) | 100 | 53.6 | -46.4% |
| Acadia Healthcare C… (ACHC) | 100 | 34.7 | -65.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: QIPT vs EHAB vs ADUS vs SGRY vs ACHC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
QIPT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +70.6% vs SGRY's -36.4%
EHAB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.35, Low D/E 88.6%, current ratio 1.63x
- Beta 0.35, current ratio 1.63x
- Beta 0.35 vs SGRY's 1.06, lower leverage
ADUS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.57
- Rev growth 23.2%, EPS growth 23.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.4%
- 411.7% 10Y total return vs QIPT's 351.7%
- 23.2% revenue growth vs QIPT's -0.2%
SGRY lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, ACHC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 23.2% revenue growth vs QIPT's -0.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.3x vs 16.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.9% margin vs ACHC's -32.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs SGRY's 1.06, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +70.6% vs SGRY's -36.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.0% ROA vs ACHC's -18.6%, ROIC 8.8% vs 5.9% |
QIPT vs EHAB vs ADUS vs SGRY vs ACHC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
QIPT vs EHAB vs ADUS vs SGRY vs ACHC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ADUS leads in 4 of 6 categories
QIPT leads 1 • EHAB leads 0 • SGRY leads 0 • ACHC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ADUS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACHC is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.4B annually — 11.8x QIPT's $287M. ADUS is the more profitable business, keeping 6.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACHC's -32.8%. On growth, QIPT holds the edge at +34.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $287M | $1.1B | $1.4B | $3.3B | $3.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $46M | $98M | $159M | $572M | $588M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | -$3M | $100M | -$76M | -$1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $27M | $81M | $137M | $208M | -$215M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +84.5% | +36.1% | +32.5% | +22.8% | +56.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.8% | +7.2% | +9.8% | +11.8% | +11.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.7% | -0.3% | +6.9% | -2.3% | -32.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.3% | +7.6% | +9.5% | +6.2% | -6.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +34.0% | +1.9% | +7.7% | +4.5% | +7.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.8% | +2.9% | +17.2% | +6.7% | -49.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — QIPT and SGRY each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, QIPT's 6.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than EHAB's 13.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $161M | $706M | $1.9B | $1.9B | $2.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $267M | $1.2B | $2.0B | $5.7B | $4.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -14.60x | -152.21x | 19.11x | -23.66x | -2.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.86x | 14.28x | 37.37x | 16.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.95x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.37x | 13.47x | 12.79x | 10.03x | 8.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.66x | 0.67x | 1.30x | 0.57x | 0.70x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.41x | 1.24x | 1.69x | 0.52x | 1.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.34x | 10.74x | 17.89x | 9.65x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ADUS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ADUS delivers a 9.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-41 for ACHC. ADUS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ACHC's 1.24x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ADUS scores 7/9 vs QIPT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.5% | -0.6% | +9.3% | -2.2% | -40.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.3% | -0.3% | +7.0% | -0.9% | -18.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.4% | +4.5% | +8.8% | +4.1% | +5.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.8% | +6.0% | +10.9% | +5.2% | +7.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.06x | 0.89x | 0.19x | 1.14x | 1.24x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7M | $456M | $127M | $3.8B | $2.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $13M | $44M | $82M | $240M | $133M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $119M | $500M | $209M | $4.0B | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.30x | 0.19x | 14.45x | 1.35x | -5.99x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ADUS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ADUS five years ago would be worth $10,340 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,861 for SGRY. Over the past 12 months, QIPT leads with a +70.6% total return vs SGRY's -36.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ADUS at 6.0% vs ACHC's -28.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.4% | +51.7% | -6.6% | -5.4% | +76.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +70.6% | +42.3% | -10.1% | -36.4% | +4.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.9% | +2.2% | +19.0% | -58.9% | -63.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.4% | -44.8% | +3.4% | -71.4% | -60.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +351.7% | -44.8% | +411.7% | +0.3% | -57.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.1% | +0.7% | +6.0% | -25.6% | -28.5% |
Risk & Volatility
QIPT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
QIPT is the less volatile stock with a -0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SGRY's 1.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. QIPT currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs SGRY's 59.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.07x | 0.35x | 0.57x | 1.06x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.65 | $14.22 | $124.44 | $24.18 | $30.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.35 | $6.47 | $90.89 | $11.41 | $11.43 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +100.0% | +97.0% | +80.0% | +59.7% | +83.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 76.6 | 59.7 | 51.2 | 57.7 | 42.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 601K | 1.1M | 236K | 1.5M | 3.1M |
Analyst Outlook
ADUS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: QIPT as "Buy", EHAB as "Hold", ADUS as "Buy", SGRY as "Buy", ACHC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.7% upside for SGRY (target: $19) vs -1.9% for EHAB (target: $14).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.65 | $13.53 | $128.67 | $19.00 | $25.59 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 11 | 16 | 22 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.2% |
ADUS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). QIPT leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
QIPT vs EHAB vs ADUS vs SGRY vs ACHC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is QIPT or EHAB or ADUS or SGRY or ACHC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Addus HomeCare Corporation (ADUS) is the stronger pick with 23.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 2% for Quipt Home Medical Corp. (QIPT). Addus HomeCare Corporation (ADUS) offers the better valuation at 19. 1x trailing P/E (14. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Quipt Home Medical Corp. (QIPT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — QIPT or EHAB or ADUS or SGRY or ACHC?
On forward P/E, Addus HomeCare Corporation is actually cheaper at 14.
3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — QIPT or EHAB or ADUS or SGRY or ACHC?
Over the past 5 years, Addus HomeCare Corporation (ADUS) delivered a total return of +3.
4%, compared to -71. 4% for Surgery Partners, Inc. (SGRY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ADUS returned +411. 7% versus ACHC's -57. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — QIPT or EHAB or ADUS or SGRY or ACHC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Quipt Home Medical Corp.
(QIPT) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 07β versus Surgery Partners, Inc. 's 1. 06β — meaning SGRY is approximately -1623% more volatile than QIPT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Addus HomeCare Corporation (ADUS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 124% for Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — QIPT or EHAB or ADUS or SGRY or ACHC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Addus HomeCare Corporation (ADUS) is pulling ahead at 23.
2% versus -0. 2% for Quipt Home Medical Corp. (QIPT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Enhabit, Inc. grew EPS 97. 1% year-over-year, compared to -537. 4% for Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, QIPT leads at 20. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — QIPT or EHAB or ADUS or SGRY or ACHC?
Addus HomeCare Corporation (ADUS) is the more profitable company, earning 6.
7% net margin versus -33. 3% for Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SGRY leads at 11. 8% versus -1. 6% for QIPT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — QIPT leads at 97. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is QIPT or EHAB or ADUS or SGRY or ACHC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Addus HomeCare Corporation (ADUS) trades at 14.
3x forward P/E versus 37. 4x for Surgery Partners, Inc. — 23. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SGRY: 31. 7% to $19. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — QIPT or EHAB or ADUS or SGRY or ACHC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is QIPT or EHAB or ADUS or SGRY or ACHC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Quipt Home Medical Corp.
(QIPT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 07), +351. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (QIPT: +351. 7%, SGRY: +0. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between QIPT and EHAB and ADUS and SGRY and ACHC?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: QIPT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EHAB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ADUS is a small-cap high-growth stock; SGRY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACHC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.