Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
QNCX vs RARE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
QNCX vs RARE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $7M | $2.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $669M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-84M | $-609M |
| Gross Margin | — | 83.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | -83.9% |
| Total Debt | $18M | $1.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $434M |
QNCX vs RARE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quince Therapeutics… (QNCX) | 100 | 0.3 | -99.7% |
| Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE) | 100 | 38.2 | -61.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: QNCX vs RARE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
QNCX is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 1.3% margin vs RARE's -91.0%
RARE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.42
- Rev growth 20.1%, EPS growth 7.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.8%
- -59.4% 10Y total return vs QNCX's -99.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.1% revenue growth vs QNCX's -48.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.3% margin vs RARE's -91.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.42 vs QNCX's 2.23 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -21.8% vs QNCX's -87.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -45.8% ROA vs QNCX's -78.5%, ROIC -89.4% vs -485.6% |
QNCX vs RARE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
QNCX vs RARE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RARE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RARE and QNCX operate at a comparable scale, with $669M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $669M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$50M | -$536M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$84M | -$609M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$48M | -$487M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +83.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -83.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -91.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -72.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -2.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -167.9% | -17.2% |
Valuation Metrics
RARE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $2.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $20M | $3.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.08x | -4.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
RARE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RARE scores 4/9 vs QNCX's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -6.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -78.5% | -45.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.9% | -89.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -64.0% | -46.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $13M | $842M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $434M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $18M | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -14.49x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RARE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RARE five years ago would be worth $2,281 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $35 for QNCX. Over the past 12 months, RARE leads with a -21.8% total return vs QNCX's -87.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RARE at -17.8% vs QNCX's -57.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -95.7% | +10.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -87.5% | -21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.0% | -44.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | -77.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | -59.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -57.0% | -17.8% |
Risk & Volatility
RARE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RARE is the less volatile stock with a 1.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than QNCX's 2.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RARE currently trades 61.7% from its 52-week high vs QNCX's 2.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.23x | 1.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $45.50 | $42.37 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.80 | $18.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +2.9% | +61.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.6 | 66.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 49.5M | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $51.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RARE leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics.
QNCX vs RARE: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is QNCX or RARE a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
(RARE) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — QNCX or RARE?
Over the past 5 years, Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
(RARE) delivered a total return of -77. 2%, compared to -99. 6% for Quince Therapeutics, Inc. (QNCX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RARE returned -59. 4% versus QNCX's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — QNCX or RARE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
(RARE) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 42β versus Quince Therapeutics, Inc. 's 2. 23β — meaning QNCX is approximately 57% more volatile than RARE relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — QNCX or RARE?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
grew EPS 7. 3% year-over-year, compared to -28. 2% for Quince Therapeutics, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — QNCX or RARE?
Quince Therapeutics, Inc.
(QNCX) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -85. 4% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QNCX leads at 0. 0% versus -79. 5% for RARE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RARE leads at 83. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — QNCX or RARE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is QNCX or RARE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
(RARE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Quince Therapeutics, Inc. (QNCX) carries a higher beta of 2. 23 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RARE: -59. 4%, QNCX: -99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between QNCX and RARE?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: QNCX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.