Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
QNTM vs CMPS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Care Facilities
QNTM vs CMPS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Medical - Care Facilities |
| Market Cap | $21M | $902M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-26M | $-288M |
| Total Debt | $2M | $21M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $150M |
QNTM vs CMPS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantum BioPharma L… (QNTM) | 100 | 2.9 | -97.1% |
| COMPASS Pathways plc (CMPS) | 100 | 28.4 | -71.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: QNTM vs CMPS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
QNTM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.98
- EPS growth 35.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.98, Low D/E 36.8%, current ratio 1.07x
CMPS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- -67.6% 10Y total return vs QNTM's -99.6%
- -85.7% revenue growth vs QNTM's -87.2%
- 1.3% margin vs QNTM's -3.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -85.7% revenue growth vs QNTM's -87.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.3% margin vs QNTM's -3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.98 vs CMPS's 1.33 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +151.1% vs QNTM's -40.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -106.8% ROA vs QNTM's -189.1% |
QNTM vs CMPS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QNTM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QNTM and CMPS operate at a comparable scale, with $0 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$15M | -$179M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$26M | -$288M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$8M | -$157M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +84.9% | -58.7% |
Valuation Metrics
CMPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21M | $902M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $21M | $774M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.62x | -3.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.23x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CMPS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CMPS delivers a -3.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-3 in annual profit, vs $-5 for QNTM. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CMPS scores 2/9 vs QNTM's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.5% | -3.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -189.1% | -106.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.3% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.0% | -2.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.37x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$29,093 | -$129M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $150M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $21M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -32.67x | -52.40x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CMPS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CMPS five years ago would be worth $2,756 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $453 for QNTM. Over the past 12 months, CMPS leads with a +151.1% total return vs QNTM's -40.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CMPS at 3.5% vs QNTM's -60.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -28.5% | +43.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -40.4% | +151.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.7% | +11.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.5% | -72.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | -67.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -60.2% | +3.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — QNTM and CMPS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
QNTM is the less volatile stock with a 0.98 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CMPS's 1.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CMPS currently trades 92.0% from its 52-week high vs QNTM's 13.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.97x | 1.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $38.25 | $10.21 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.07 | $2.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +13.1% | +92.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.5 | 68.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 495K | 3.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $18.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CMPS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). QNTM leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
QNTM vs CMPS: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is QNTM or CMPS a better buy right now?
Analysts rate COMPASS Pathways plc (CMPS) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison.
The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — QNTM or CMPS?
Over the past 5 years, COMPASS Pathways plc (CMPS) delivered a total return of -72.
4%, compared to -95. 5% for Quantum BioPharma Ltd. (QNTM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CMPS returned -65. 8% versus QNTM's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — QNTM or CMPS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Quantum BioPharma Ltd.
(QNTM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 97β versus COMPASS Pathways plc's 1. 28β — meaning CMPS is approximately 32% more volatile than QNTM relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — QNTM or CMPS?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Quantum BioPharma Ltd.
grew EPS 35. 1% year-over-year, compared to -33. 9% for COMPASS Pathways plc. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — QNTM or CMPS?
Quantum BioPharma Ltd.
(QNTM) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus 0. 0% for COMPASS Pathways plc — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QNTM leads at 0. 0% versus 0. 0% for CMPS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — QNTM leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — QNTM or CMPS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is QNTM or CMPS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Quantum BioPharma Ltd.
(QNTM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 97)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (QNTM: -99. 6%, CMPS: -65. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between QNTM and CMPS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.