QSR vs DENN

For growth investors, Restaurant Brands International Inc.

(QSR) is the stronger pick with 12. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 5% for Denny's Corporation (DENN). Denny's Corporation (DENN) offers the better valuation at 15. 2x trailing P/E (15. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) a "Buy" — based on 44 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Denny's Corporation (DENN) is the cheapest at 15.

2x versus Restaurant Brands International Inc. at 33. 7x. On forward P/E, Denny's Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 0x.

Over the past 5 years, Restaurant Brands International Inc.

(QSR) delivered a total return of +30. 3%, compared to -64. 9% for Denny's Corporation (DENN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: QSR returned +132. 2% versus DENN's -42. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Restaurant Brands International Inc.

(QSR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Denny's Corporation's 0. 65β — meaning DENN is approximately 66% more volatile than QSR relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Restaurant Brands International Inc.

(QSR) is pulling ahead at 12. 2% versus -2. 5% for Denny's Corporation (DENN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Denny's Corporation grew EPS 17. 1% year-over-year, compared to -26. 1% for Restaurant Brands International Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, QSR leads at 13. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Restaurant Brands International Inc.

(QSR) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 2% net margin versus 4. 8% for Denny's Corporation — meaning it keeps 8. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QSR leads at 23. 7% versus 10. 0% for DENN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DENN leads at 73. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Denny's Corporation (DENN) trades at 15.

0x forward P/E versus 19. 5x for Restaurant Brands International Inc. — 4. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for QSR: 5. 8% to $83. 71.

In this comparison, QSR (3.

1% yield) pays a dividend. DENN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Restaurant Brands International Inc.

(QSR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), 3. 1% yield, +132. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (QSR: +132. 2%, DENN: -42. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: QSR is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; DENN is a small-cap deep-value stock. QSR pays a dividend while DENN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.