Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
QTTB logo
QTTB
AKRO logo
AKRO
IMVT logo
IMVT
ABBV logo
ABBV
IQV logo
IQV
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

QTTB vs AKRO vs IMVT vs ABBV vs IQV

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
QTTB
Q32 Bio Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$162M
5Y Perf.-95.4%
AKRO
Akero Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.50B
5Y Perf.+118.1%
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.75B
5Y Perf.+38.1%
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.

Drug Manufacturers - General

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$397.56B
5Y Perf.+132.0%
IQV
IQVIA Holdings Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$30.73B
5Y Perf.+27.9%

QTTB vs AKRO vs IMVT vs ABBV vs IQV — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
QTTB logoQTTB
AKRO logoAKRO
IMVT logoIMVT
ABBV logoABBV
IQV logoIQV
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyDrug Manufacturers - GeneralMedical - Diagnostics & Research
Market Cap$162M$4.50B$6.75B$397.56B$30.73B
Revenue (TTM)$54M$0.00$0.00$61.16B$16.63B
Net Income (TTM)$33M$-293M$-506M$4.23B$1.39B
Gross Margin99.5%70.2%26.1%
Operating Margin39.8%26.7%13.9%
Forward P/E5.2x16.0x14.2x
Total Debt$15M$36M$72K$69.07B$16.17B
Cash & Equiv.$48M$340M$902M$5.23B$1.98B

QTTB vs AKRO vs IMVT vs ABBV vs IQVLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

QTTB
AKRO
IMVT
ABBV
IQV
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Q32 Bio Inc. (QTTB)1004.6-95.4%
Akero Therapeutics,… (AKRO)100218.1+118.1%
Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT)100138.1+38.1%
AbbVie Inc. (ABBV)100232.0+132.0%
IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV)100127.9+27.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: QTTB vs AKRO vs IMVT vs ABBV vs IQV

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: QTTB leads in 5 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. AbbVie Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇QTTB emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
QTTB
Q32 Bio Inc.
The Growth Leader

QTTB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and value.

  • 156.7% revenue growth vs AKRO's -24.6%
  • Lower P/E (5.2x vs 16.0x)
  • 61.9% margin vs IMVT's 2.6%
  • +6.5% vs AKRO's +3.2%
Best for: growth and value
AKRO
Akero Therapeutics, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

AKRO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.35, Low D/E 4.9%, current ratio 19.38x
  • Beta 0.35, current ratio 19.38x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

IMVT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
The Income Pick

ABBV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 43 yrs, beta 0.15, yield 2.9%
  • Rev growth 8.6%, EPS growth -0.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.8%
  • 357.3% 10Y total return vs IMVT's 230.5%
  • Beta 0.15 vs IMVT's 1.67
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
IQV
IQVIA Holdings Inc.
The Value Angle

Among these 5 stocks, IQV doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthQTTB logoQTTB156.7% revenue growth vs AKRO's -24.6%
ValueQTTB logoQTTBLower P/E (5.2x vs 16.0x)
Quality / MarginsQTTB logoQTTB61.9% margin vs IMVT's 2.6%
Stability / SafetyABBV logoABBVBeta 0.15 vs IMVT's 1.67
DividendsABBV logoABBV2.9% yield; 43-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)QTTB logoQTTB+6.5% vs AKRO's +3.2%
Efficiency (ROA)QTTB logoQTTB53.3% ROA vs IMVT's -62.2%

QTTB vs AKRO vs IMVT vs ABBV vs IQV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Biotech & Healthcare Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Biotech & Healthcare Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
QTTBQ32 Bio Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

AKROAkero Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

IMVTImmunovant, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ABBVAbbVie Inc.
FY 2025
SKYRIZI
30.2%$17.6B
RINVOQ
14.3%$8.3B
H U M I R A
7.8%$4.5B
Botox Therapeutic
6.5%$3.8B
Vraylar
6.2%$3.6B
Imbruvica
4.9%$2.9B
VENCLEXTA
4.8%$2.8B
Other (14)
25.3%$14.7B
IQVIQVIA Holdings Inc.
FY 2025
Research And Development Solutions
54.5%$8.9B
Technology And Analytics Solutions
40.6%$6.6B
Contract Sales And Medical Solutions
4.8%$788M

QTTB vs AKRO vs IMVT vs ABBV vs IQV — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLABBVLAGGINGIMVT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — QTTB and ABBV each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

ABBV and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $61.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. QTTB is the more profitable business, keeping 61.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ABBV's 6.9%.

MetricQTTB logoQTTBQ32 Bio Inc.AKRO logoAKROAkero Therapeutic…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$54M$0$0$61.2B$16.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$22M-$318M-$532M$24.5B$3.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$33M-$293M-$506M$4.2B$1.4B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$27M-$250M-$407M$18.7B$2.7B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+99.5%+70.2%+26.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+39.8%+26.7%+13.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+61.9%+6.9%+8.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-51.0%+30.6%+16.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+10.0%+8.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+40.0%+5.7%-14.1%+57.4%+15.0%
Evenly matched — QTTB and ABBV each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

IQV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 5.2x trailing earnings, QTTB trades at a 94% valuation discount to ABBV's 94.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, QTTB's 7.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ABBV's 16.3x.

MetricQTTB logoQTTBQ32 Bio Inc.AKRO logoAKROAkero Therapeutic…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…
Market CapShares × price$162M$4.5B$6.8B$397.6B$30.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$129M$4.2B$5.8B$461.4B$44.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS5.25x-14.57x-11.87x94.84x23.09x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.15.96x14.16x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.57x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.48x16.34x13.09x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.02x6.50x1.88x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.72x4.89x7.04x4.74x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF22.32x14.98x
IQV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — QTTB and IMVT and ABBV each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

ABBV delivers a 62.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $62 in annual profit, vs $-68 for IMVT. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQV's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ABBV scores 6/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricQTTB logoQTTBQ32 Bio Inc.AKRO logoAKROAkero Therapeutic…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+2.3%-30.6%-68.2%+62.1%+22.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+53.3%-29.1%-62.2%+3.1%+4.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-55.3%+23.9%+8.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+26.8%-42.4%-68.3%+21.5%+11.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–942264
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.37x0.05x0.00x2.44x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$33M-$304M-$902M$63.8B$14.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$48M$340M$902M$5.2B$2.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$15M$36M$72,000$69.1B$16.2B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense21.88x-62.41x3.28x3.10x
Evenly matched — QTTB and IMVT and ABBV each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ABBV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $30,700 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $984 for QTTB. Over the past 12 months, QTTB leads with a +647.1% total return vs AKRO's +3.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ABBV at 21.0% vs QTTB's -14.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricQTTB logoQTTBQ32 Bio Inc.AKRO logoAKROAkero Therapeutic…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+269.2%+26.9%-0.5%-19.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+647.1%+3.2%+103.6%+20.9%+14.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-37.0%-1.2%+51.6%+77.1%-14.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-90.2%+88.6%+207.0%+121.1%-25.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.2%+198.3%+230.5%+357.3%+176.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-14.3%-0.4%+14.9%+21.0%-5.1%
ABBV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — AKRO and ABBV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ABBV is the less volatile stock with a 0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMVT's 1.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AKRO currently trades 95.3% from its 52-week high vs IQV's 73.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricQTTB logoQTTBQ32 Bio Inc.AKRO logoAKROAkero Therapeutic…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.50x0.32x1.66x0.14x1.16x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$14.85$57.35$36.27$244.81$247.05
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.35$41.77$14.32$181.73$153.01
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+85.5%+95.3%+90.6%+91.8%+73.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10065.270.451.963.255.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded824K01.9M4.6M1.5M
Evenly matched — AKRO and ABBV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

ABBV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: QTTB as "Hold", AKRO as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", ABBV as "Buy", IQV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 32.8% upside for IMVT (target: $44) vs -11.4% for AKRO (target: $48). ABBV is the only dividend payer here at 2.92% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricQTTB logoQTTBQ32 Bio Inc.AKRO logoAKROAkero Therapeutic…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$13.50$48.40$43.67$256.92$222.22
# AnalystsCovering analysts814234144
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises432
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$6.57
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.2%+4.0%
ABBV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

ABBV leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). IQV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.

Best OverallAbbVie Inc. (ABBV)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

QTTB vs AKRO vs IMVT vs ABBV vs IQV: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is QTTB or AKRO or IMVT or ABBV or IQV a better buy right now?

For growth investors, AbbVie Inc.

(ABBV) is the stronger pick with 8. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 9% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV). Q32 Bio Inc. (QTTB) offers the better valuation at 5. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Akero Therapeutics, Inc. (AKRO) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — QTTB or AKRO or IMVT or ABBV or IQV?

On trailing P/E, Q32 Bio Inc.

(QTTB) is the cheapest at 5. 2x versus AbbVie Inc. at 94. 8x. On forward P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — QTTB or AKRO or IMVT or ABBV or IQV?

Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.

(IMVT) delivered a total return of +207. 0%, compared to -90. 2% for Q32 Bio Inc. (QTTB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ABBV returned +362. 2% versus QTTB's -96. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — QTTB or AKRO or IMVT or ABBV or IQV?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AbbVie Inc.

(ABBV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 14β versus Immunovant, Inc. 's 1. 66β — meaning IMVT is approximately 1118% more volatile than ABBV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — QTTB or AKRO or IMVT or ABBV or IQV?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), AbbVie Inc.

(ABBV) is pulling ahead at 8. 6% versus 5. 9% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Q32 Bio Inc. grew EPS 136. 8% year-over-year, compared to -29. 8% for Akero Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, QTTB leads at 100. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — QTTB or AKRO or IMVT or ABBV or IQV?

Q32 Bio Inc.

(QTTB) is the more profitable company, earning 55. 5% net margin versus 0. 0% for Immunovant, Inc. — meaning it keeps 55. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ABBV leads at 32. 8% versus 0. 0% for IMVT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — QTTB leads at 99. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is QTTB or AKRO or IMVT or ABBV or IQV more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, IQVIA Holdings Inc.

(IQV) trades at 14. 2x forward P/E versus 16. 0x for AbbVie Inc. — 1. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IMVT: 32. 8% to $43. 67.

08

Which pays a better dividend — QTTB or AKRO or IMVT or ABBV or IQV?

In this comparison, ABBV (2.

9% yield) pays a dividend. QTTB, AKRO, IMVT, IQV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is QTTB or AKRO or IMVT or ABBV or IQV better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, AbbVie Inc.

(ABBV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 14), 2. 9% yield, +362. 2% 10Y return). Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a higher beta of 1. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABBV: +362. 2%, IMVT: +237. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between QTTB and AKRO and IMVT and ABBV and IQV?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: QTTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; AKRO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ABBV is a large-cap quality compounder stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. ABBV pays a dividend while QTTB, AKRO, IMVT, IQV do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.