Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
QTTB logo
QTTB
CABA logo
CABA
IMVT logo
IMVT
ARQT logo
ARQT
REGN logo
REGN
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

QTTB vs CABA vs IMVT vs ARQT vs REGN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
QTTB
Q32 Bio Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$161M
5Y Perf.-95.4%
CABA
Cabaletta Bio, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$491M
5Y Perf.-73.0%
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.90B
5Y Perf.+38.1%
ARQT
Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.05B
5Y Perf.-19.4%
REGN
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$63.60B
5Y Perf.-1.8%

QTTB vs CABA vs IMVT vs ARQT vs REGN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
QTTB logoQTTB
CABA logoCABA
IMVT logoIMVT
ARQT logoARQT
REGN logoREGN
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$161M$491M$6.90B$3.05B$63.60B
Revenue (TTM)$54M$0.00$0.00$416M$14.92B
Net Income (TTM)$33M$-175M$-506M$-2M$4.42B
Gross Margin99.5%90.9%84.5%
Operating Margin39.8%0.8%24.3%
Forward P/E5.2x122.5x13.2x
Total Debt$15M$27M$72K$6M$2.71B
Cash & Equiv.$48M$83M$902M$43M$3.12B

QTTB vs CABA vs IMVT vs ARQT vs REGNLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

QTTB
CABA
IMVT
ARQT
REGN
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Q32 Bio Inc. (QTTB)1004.6-95.4%
Cabaletta Bio, Inc. (CABA)10027.0-73.0%
Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT)100138.1+38.1%
Arcutis Biotherapeu… (ARQT)10080.6-19.4%
Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN)10098.2-1.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: QTTB vs CABA vs IMVT vs ARQT vs REGN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: QTTB leads in 6 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇QTTB emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
QTTB
Q32 Bio Inc.
The Defensive Pick

QTTB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 36.5%, current ratio 4.85x
  • Beta 0.50, current ratio 4.85x
  • 156.7% revenue growth vs CABA's -39.2%
  • Lower P/E (5.2x vs 13.2x)
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
CABA
Cabaletta Bio, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

CABA plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: healthcare exposure
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 237.9% 10Y total return vs REGN's 68.2%
Best for: long-term compounding
ARQT
Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
The Growth Play

ARQT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 91.3%, EPS growth 88.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 367.3%
Best for: growth exposure
REGN
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Income Pick

REGN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.51, yield 0.6%
  • 0.6% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthQTTB logoQTTB156.7% revenue growth vs CABA's -39.2%
ValueQTTB logoQTTBLower P/E (5.2x vs 13.2x)
Quality / MarginsQTTB logoQTTB61.9% margin vs ARQT's -0.6%
Stability / SafetyQTTB logoQTTBBeta 0.50 vs CABA's 2.02
DividendsREGN logoREGN0.6% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)QTTB logoQTTB+6.4% vs REGN's +18.0%
Efficiency (ROA)QTTB logoQTTB53.3% ROA vs CABA's -96.5%

QTTB vs CABA vs IMVT vs ARQT vs REGN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Biotech & Healthcare Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Biotech & Healthcare Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
QTTBQ32 Bio Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

CABACabaletta Bio, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

IMVTImmunovant, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ARQTArcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
FY 2023
Other Revenue
51.0%$30M
Product
49.0%$29M
REGNRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
FY 2025
Collaboration Revenue
51.1%$7.3B
Product
44.0%$6.3B
Product and Service, Other
4.9%$703M

QTTB vs CABA vs IMVT vs ARQT vs REGN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLQTTBLAGGINGREGN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

QTTB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

REGN and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $14.9B and $0 in trailing revenue. QTTB is the more profitable business, keeping 61.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ARQT's -0.6%. On growth, ARQT holds the edge at +60.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricQTTB logoQTTBQ32 Bio Inc.CABA logoCABACabaletta Bio, In…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…REGN logoREGNRegeneron Pharmac…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$54M$0$0$416M$14.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$22M-$178M-$532M$6M$4.2B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$33M-$175M-$506M-$2M$4.4B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$27M-$143M-$407M$27M$4.2B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+99.5%+90.9%+84.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+39.8%+0.8%+24.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+61.9%-0.6%+29.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-51.0%+6.5%+27.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+60.1%+19.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+40.0%+46.6%-14.1%+55.0%-7.2%
QTTB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — QTTB and REGN each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 5.2x trailing earnings, QTTB trades at a 65% valuation discount to REGN's 14.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, QTTB's 7.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than REGN's 15.3x.

MetricQTTB logoQTTBQ32 Bio Inc.CABA logoCABACabaletta Bio, In…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…REGN logoREGNRegeneron Pharmac…
Market CapShares × price$161M$491M$6.9B$3.0B$63.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$129M$435M$6.0B$3.0B$63.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS5.22x-1.84x-12.14x-187.54x14.76x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.122.45x13.18x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.33x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.43x15.33x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.01x8.11x4.43x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.70x2.75x7.19x16.37x2.13x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF15.59x
Evenly matched — QTTB and REGN each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — QTTB and IMVT and REGN each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

QTTB delivers a 2.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-132 for CABA. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to QTTB's 0.37x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), REGN scores 5/9 vs CABA's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricQTTB logoQTTBQ32 Bio Inc.CABA logoCABACabaletta Bio, In…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…REGN logoREGNRegeneron Pharmac…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+2.3%-131.6%-68.2%-1.4%+14.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+53.3%-96.5%-62.2%-0.6%+11.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-4.3%-5.2%+8.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+26.8%-126.2%-68.3%-4.3%+10.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–941245
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.37x0.24x0.00x0.03x0.09x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$33M-$56M-$902M-$37M-$412M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$48M$83M$902M$43M$3.1B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$15M$27M$72,000$6M$2.7B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense21.88x-73.78x2.08x108.44x
Evenly matched — QTTB and IMVT and REGN each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — QTTB and IMVT and ARQT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $31,304 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $950 for QTTB. Over the past 12 months, QTTB leads with a +643.5% total return vs REGN's +18.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARQT at 33.7% vs CABA's -37.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricQTTB logoQTTBQ32 Bio Inc.CABA logoCABACabaletta Bio, In…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…REGN logoREGNRegeneron Pharmac…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+267.4%+36.2%+29.8%-15.9%-20.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+643.5%+67.2%+110.9%+80.6%+18.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-37.3%-75.6%+55.0%+138.8%-18.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-90.5%-64.2%+213.0%-16.2%+16.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.2%-69.9%+237.9%+11.8%+68.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-14.4%-37.5%+15.7%+33.7%-6.4%
Evenly matched — QTTB and IMVT and ARQT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — QTTB and IMVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

QTTB is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CABA's 2.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 92.7% from its 52-week high vs CABA's 71.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricQTTB logoQTTBQ32 Bio Inc.CABA logoCABACabaletta Bio, In…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…REGN logoREGNRegeneron Pharmac…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.50x2.02x1.66x1.45x0.51x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$14.85$4.23$36.27$31.77$821.11
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.35$1.26$14.32$12.72$503.25
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+85.1%+71.2%+92.7%+76.7%+74.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10064.235.957.966.437.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded827K3.6M1.9M1.5M868K
Evenly matched — QTTB and IMVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: QTTB as "Hold", CABA as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", ARQT as "Buy", REGN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 442.5% upside for CABA (target: $16) vs 6.8% for QTTB (target: $14). REGN is the only dividend payer here at 0.56% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricQTTB logoQTTBQ32 Bio Inc.CABA logoCABACabaletta Bio, In…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…REGN logoREGNRegeneron Pharmac…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$13.50$16.33$43.67$34.00$836.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts812231248
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises11
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$3.41
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%+6.2%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

QTTB leads in 1 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow. 4 categories are tied.

Best OverallQ32 Bio Inc. (QTTB)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

QTTB vs CABA vs IMVT vs ARQT vs REGN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is QTTB or CABA or IMVT or ARQT or REGN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.

(ARQT) is the stronger pick with 91. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 0% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN). Q32 Bio Inc. (QTTB) offers the better valuation at 5. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cabaletta Bio, Inc. (CABA) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — QTTB or CABA or IMVT or ARQT or REGN?

On trailing P/E, Q32 Bio Inc.

(QTTB) is the cheapest at 5. 2x versus Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 14. 8x. On forward P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — QTTB or CABA or IMVT or ARQT or REGN?

Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.

(IMVT) delivered a total return of +213. 0%, compared to -90. 5% for Q32 Bio Inc. (QTTB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMVT returned +237. 9% versus QTTB's -96. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — QTTB or CABA or IMVT or ARQT or REGN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Q32 Bio Inc.

(QTTB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 50β versus Cabaletta Bio, Inc. 's 2. 02β — meaning CABA is approximately 302% more volatile than QTTB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 37% for Q32 Bio Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — QTTB or CABA or IMVT or ARQT or REGN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.

(ARQT) is pulling ahead at 91. 3% versus 1. 0% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Q32 Bio Inc. grew EPS 136. 8% year-over-year, compared to -1. 5% for Immunovant, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARQT leads at 367. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — QTTB or CABA or IMVT or ARQT or REGN?

Q32 Bio Inc.

(QTTB) is the more profitable company, earning 55. 5% net margin versus -4. 3% for Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 55. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QTTB leads at 31. 5% versus -3. 3% for ARQT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — QTTB leads at 99. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is QTTB or CABA or IMVT or ARQT or REGN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(REGN) trades at 13. 2x forward P/E versus 122. 5x for Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. — 109. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CABA: 442. 5% to $16. 33.

08

Which pays a better dividend — QTTB or CABA or IMVT or ARQT or REGN?

In this comparison, REGN (0.

6% yield) pays a dividend. QTTB, CABA, IMVT, ARQT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is QTTB or CABA or IMVT or ARQT or REGN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(REGN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 51), 0. 6% yield). Cabaletta Bio, Inc. (CABA) carries a higher beta of 2. 02 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (REGN: +68. 2%, CABA: -69. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between QTTB and CABA and IMVT and ARQT and REGN?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: QTTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CABA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARQT is a small-cap high-growth stock; REGN is a mid-cap deep-value stock. REGN pays a dividend while QTTB, CABA, IMVT, ARQT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.