R
Ryder System, Inc.
Rental & Leasing Services
Market Cap$9.53B
5Y Perf.+605.8%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
R vs CHRW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
CHRW
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
Integrated Freight & Logistics
Market Cap$20.33B
5Y Perf.+11.5%
R vs CHRW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | R | CHRW |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Rental & Leasing Services | Integrated Freight & Logistics |
| Market Cap | $9.53B | $20.33B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12.66B | $16.20B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $495M | $599M |
| Gross Margin | 26.0% | 8.3% |
| Operating Margin | 7.4% | 4.9% |
| Forward P/E | 16.6x | 27.9x |
| Total Debt | $8.68B | $1.63B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $198M | $161M |
R vs CHRW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
R
CHRW
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ryder System, Inc. (R) | 100 | 705.8 | +605.8% |
| C.H. Robinson World… (CHRW) | 100 | 211.2 | +111.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: R vs CHRW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CHRW leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. Ryder System, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
R
Ryder System, Inc.
The Growth Play
R is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 0.2%, EPS growth 8.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.8%
- 287.8% 10Y total return vs CHRW's 163.6%
- 0.2% revenue growth vs CHRW's -8.4%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
CHRW
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
The Income Pick
CHRW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.95, yield 1.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.95, Low D/E 88.3%, current ratio 1.53x
- Beta 0.95, yield 1.4%, current ratio 1.53x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | R | 0.2% revenue growth vs CHRW's -8.4% |
| Value | R | Lower P/E (16.6x vs 27.9x) |
| Quality / Margins | R | 3.9% margin vs CHRW's 3.7% |
| Stability / Safety | CHRW | Beta 0.95 vs R's 1.39, lower leverage |
| Dividends | CHRW | 1.4% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs R's 1.4% |
| Momentum (1Y) | CHRW | +98.6% vs R's +73.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CHRW | 11.5% ROA vs R's 3.9%, ROIC 18.0% vs 7.0% |
R vs CHRW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
R vs CHRW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLRLAGGINGCHRW
CHRWC.H. Robinson Worldwi…
1leads
RRyder System, Inc.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs CHRWMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
R4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
R6/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CHRW7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
R5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
R leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHRW and R operate at a comparable scale, with $16.2B and $12.7B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.9% (R) to 3.7% (CHRW).
| Metric | RRyder System, Inc. | CHRWC.H. Robinson Wor… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12.7B | $16.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.6B | $896M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $495M | $599M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $478M | $858M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.0% | +8.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | +4.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | +3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.8% | +5.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.2% | -0.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.1% | +9.9% |
R leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
R leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.2x trailing earnings, R trades at a 43% valuation discount to CHRW's 35.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, R's 5.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CHRW's 24.3x.
| Metric | RRyder System, Inc. | CHRWC.H. Robinson Wor… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.5B | $20.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $18.0B | $21.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.17x | 35.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.57x | 27.86x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 6.62x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.42x | 24.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.75x | 1.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.31x | 11.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.77x | 22.72x |
R leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CHRW leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
R delivers a 39.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $40 in annual profit, vs $33 for CHRW. CHRW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.88x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to R's 2.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), R scores 9/9 vs CHRW's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | RRyder System, Inc. | CHRWC.H. Robinson Wor… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +39.5% | +33.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.9% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.0% | +18.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.0% | +25.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.84x | 0.88x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8.5B | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $198M | $161M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8.7B | $1.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.13x | 6.27x |
CHRW leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
R leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in R five years ago would be worth $29,350 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $18,412 for CHRW. Over the past 12 months, CHRW leads with a +98.6% total return vs R's +73.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors R at 44.7% vs CHRW's 20.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | RRyder System, Inc. | CHRWC.H. Robinson Wor… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +25.0% | +5.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +73.7% | +98.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +202.7% | +73.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +193.5% | +84.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +287.8% | +163.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +44.7% | +20.2% |
R leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — R and CHRW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CHRW is the less volatile stock with a 0.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than R's 1.39 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. R currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs CHRW's 84.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | RRyder System, Inc. | CHRWC.H. Robinson Wor… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.39x | 0.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $258.49 | $203.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $139.89 | $86.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.6% | +84.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.9 | 42.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 373K | 1.7M |
Evenly matched — R and CHRW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — R and CHRW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates R as "Buy" and CHRW as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 9.3% upside for CHRW (target: $187) vs 2.3% for R (target: $247). For income investors, CHRW offers the higher dividend yield at 1.45% vs R's 1.43%.
| Metric | RRyder System, Inc. | CHRWC.H. Robinson Wor… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $247.33 | $187.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 35 | 46 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.4% | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 21 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.47 | $2.48 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.4% | +1.7% |
Evenly matched — R and CHRW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
R leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CHRW leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
Best OverallRyder System, Inc. (R)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
R vs CHRW: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is R or CHRW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ryder System, Inc.
(R) is the stronger pick with 0. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 4% for C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW). Ryder System, Inc. (R) offers the better valuation at 20. 2x trailing P/E (16. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ryder System, Inc. (R) a "Buy" — based on 35 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — R or CHRW?
On trailing P/E, Ryder System, Inc.
(R) is the cheapest at 20. 2x versus C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. at 35. 5x. On forward P/E, Ryder System, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — R or CHRW?
Over the past 5 years, Ryder System, Inc.
(R) delivered a total return of +193. 5%, compared to +84. 1% for C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: R returned +287. 8% versus CHRW's +163. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — R or CHRW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), C.
H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 95β versus Ryder System, Inc. 's 1. 39β — meaning R is approximately 46% more volatile than CHRW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 88% versus 3% for Ryder System, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — R or CHRW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ryder System, Inc.
(R) is pulling ahead at 0. 2% versus -8. 4% for C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. grew EPS 25. 1% year-over-year, compared to 8. 4% for Ryder System, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, R leads at 1. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — R or CHRW?
Ryder System, Inc.
(R) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 9% net margin versus 3. 6% for C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: R leads at 8. 6% versus 4. 9% for CHRW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — R leads at 19. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is R or CHRW more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Ryder System, Inc.
(R) trades at 16. 6x forward P/E versus 27. 9x for C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. — 11. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CHRW: 9. 3% to $187. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — R or CHRW?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) offers the highest yield at 1. 4%, versus 1. 4% for Ryder System, Inc. (R).
09Is R or CHRW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, C.
H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 95), 1. 4% yield, +163. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CHRW: +163. 6%, R: +287. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between R and CHRW?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Net Margin>
%
(R: 3.9% · CHRW: 3.7%)P/E Ratio<
x
(R: 20.2x · CHRW: 35.5x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.