RACE vs F

For growth investors, Ferrari N.

V. (RACE) is the stronger pick with 7. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 2% for Ford Motor Company (F). Ferrari N. V. (RACE) offers the better valuation at 31. 1x trailing P/E (34. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ferrari N. V. (RACE) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Ford Motor Company is actually cheaper at 7.

4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Ferrari N.

V. (RACE) delivered a total return of +69. 0%, compared to +31. 1% for Ford Motor Company (F). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RACE returned +732. 1% versus F's +32. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ferrari N.

V. (RACE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 78β versus Ford Motor Company's 0. 97β — meaning F is approximately 25% more volatile than RACE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ferrari N. V. (RACE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 74% versus 5% for Ford Motor Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ferrari N.

V. (RACE) is pulling ahead at 7. 0% versus 1. 2% for Ford Motor Company (F). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ferrari N. V. grew EPS 5. 9% year-over-year, compared to -241. 1% for Ford Motor Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, RACE leads at 11. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Ferrari N.

V. (RACE) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 3% net margin versus -4. 4% for Ford Motor Company — meaning it keeps 22. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RACE leads at 29. 5% versus 1. 4% for F. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RACE leads at 51. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Ford Motor Company (F) trades at 7.

4x forward P/E versus 34. 2x for Ferrari N. V. — 26. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RACE: 40. 4% to $456. 78.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Ford Motor Company (F) offers the highest yield at 6. 4%, versus 2. 1% for Ferrari N. V. (RACE).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Ferrari N.

V. (RACE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 78), 2. 1% yield, +732. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RACE: +732. 1%, F: +32. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: RACE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; F is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.