Automakers
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
F vs GM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Automakers
F vs GM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Automakers | Automakers |
| Market Cap | $49.61B | $77.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $186.97B | $186.95B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7.79B | $3.93B |
| Gross Margin | 12.4% | 9.0% |
| Operating Margin | 1.9% | 2.3% |
| Forward P/E | 6.5x | 6.4x |
| Total Debt | $167.57B | $130.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $23.36B | $20.95B |
F vs GM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | Nov 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ford Motor Company (F) | 100 | 137.0 | +37.0% |
| General Motors Comp… (GM) | 100 | 196.5 | +96.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: F vs GM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
F is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.04, yield 6.0%
- Rev growth 1.2%, EPS growth -241.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.04, current ratio 1.07x
GM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 192.3% 10Y total return vs F's 58.9%
- Lower P/E (6.4x vs 6.5x)
- 2.1% margin vs F's -4.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.2% revenue growth vs GM's -1.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.4x vs 6.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.1% margin vs F's -4.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.04 vs GM's 1.09 | |
| Dividends | 6.0% yield, vs GM's 0.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.2% vs F's -0.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.4% ROA vs F's -2.7%, ROIC 1.3% vs 1.0% |
F vs GM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
F vs GM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
F and GM operate at a comparable scale, with $187.0B and $187.0B in trailing revenue. GM is the more profitable business, keeping 2.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to F's -4.2%. On growth, GM holds the edge at +2.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $187.0B | $187.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $10.1B | $12.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7.8B | $3.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $5.1B | $16.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +12.4% | +9.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | +2.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.2% | +2.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +8.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.0% | +2.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.7% | +176.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — F and GM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, GM's 10.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than F's 22.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $49.6B | $77.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $193.8B | $187.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.04x | 26.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.54x | 6.36x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.73x | 10.70x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.26x | 0.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.38x | 1.33x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.98x | 7.04x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GM leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GM delivers a 6.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-21 for F. GM carries lower financial leverage with a 2.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to F's 4.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GM scores 6/9 vs F's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -21.3% | +6.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.7% | +1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.0% | +1.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.4% | +1.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.66x | 2.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $144.2B | $109.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $23.4B | $20.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $167.6B | $130.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5.43x | 6.83x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GM five years ago would be worth $14,814 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,074 for F. Over the past 12 months, GM leads with a +26.2% total return vs F's -0.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GM at 44.5% vs F's 11.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.4% | +7.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -0.6% | +26.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.9% | +201.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.3% | +48.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +58.9% | +192.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.8% | +44.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — F and GM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
F is the less volatile stock with a 1.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GM's 1.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GM currently trades 92.0% from its 52-week high vs F's 70.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.04x | 1.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.78 | $93.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.11 | $67.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.0% | +92.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.4 | 60.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 45.3M | 8.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — F and GM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates F as "Hold" and GM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.1% upside for F (target: $16) vs 17.1% for GM (target: $101). For income investors, F offers the higher dividend yield at 6.04% vs GM's 0.78%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.56 | $100.91 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 47 | 51 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.0% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.75 | $0.68 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +7.8% |
GM leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
Custom Comparison: F vs GM
Compare on any lens — Growth, Value, Income, or pick from 130+ individual metrics.
F vs GM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is F or GM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ford Motor Company (F) is the stronger pick with 1.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 3% for General Motors Company (GM). General Motors Company (GM) offers the better valuation at 26. 3x trailing P/E (6. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate General Motors Company (GM) a "Buy" — based on 51 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — F or GM?
On forward P/E, General Motors Company is actually cheaper at 6.
4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — F or GM?
Over the past 5 years, General Motors Company (GM) delivered a total return of +48.
1%, compared to -19. 3% for Ford Motor Company (F). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GM returned +192. 3% versus F's +58. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — F or GM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ford Motor Company (F) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
04β versus General Motors Company's 1. 09β — meaning GM is approximately 5% more volatile than F relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, General Motors Company (GM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 5% for Ford Motor Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — F or GM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ford Motor Company (F) is pulling ahead at 1.
2% versus -1. 3% for General Motors Company (GM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: General Motors Company grew EPS -48. 7% year-over-year, compared to -241. 1% for Ford Motor Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, F leads at 5. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — F or GM?
General Motors Company (GM) is the more profitable company, earning 1.
5% net margin versus -4. 4% for Ford Motor Company — meaning it keeps 1. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GM leads at 1. 6% versus 1. 4% for F. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — F leads at 12. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is F or GM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, General Motors Company (GM) trades at 6.
4x forward P/E versus 6. 5x for Ford Motor Company — 0. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for F: 25. 1% to $15. 56.
08Which pays a better dividend — F or GM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Ford Motor Company (F) offers the highest yield at 6. 0%, versus 0. 8% for General Motors Company (GM).
09Is F or GM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, General Motors Company (GM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
09), 0. 8% yield, +192. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GM: +192. 3%, F: +58. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between F and GM?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: F is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; GM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Related Comparisons
Other popular comparisons that include one of these companies.