Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RADX vs RNAZ vs ARWR vs RNW vs NTLA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Renewable Utilities
Biotechnology
RADX vs RNAZ vs ARWR vs RNW vs NTLA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Renewable Utilities | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $33M | $7M | $10.92B | $1.33B | $1.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $0.00 | $622M | $129.66B | $68M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-38M | $-27M | $-301M | $11.97B | $-413M |
| Gross Margin | 1.1% | — | 85.1% | 77.9% | -25.6% |
| Operating Margin | -10.5% | — | -35.7% | 48.4% | -6.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 0.4x | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $38K | $366M | $732.28B | $93M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $29M | $6M | $227M | $40.42B | $155M |
RADX vs RNAZ vs ARWR vs RNW vs NTLA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Radiopharm Theranos… (RADX) | 100 | 92.4 | -7.6% |
| TransCode Therapeut… (RNAZ) | 100 | 12.1 | -87.9% |
| Arrowhead Pharmaceu… (ARWR) | 100 | 414.6 | +314.6% |
| ReNew Energy Global… (RNW) | 100 | 79.1 | -20.9% |
| Intellia Therapeuti… (NTLA) | 100 | 117.6 | +17.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RADX vs RNAZ vs ARWR vs RNW vs NTLA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RADX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.
- Beta 0.88, current ratio 2.67x
RNAZ lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ARWR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 232.6%, EPS growth 99.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 50.5%
- 12.5% 10Y total return vs RNW's -50.5%
- 232.6% revenue growth vs RNAZ's -87.4%
- +496.9% vs RNAZ's -19.6%
RNW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.62
- Lower volatility, beta 0.62, current ratio 0.60x
- 9.2% margin vs RADX's -10.6%
- Beta 0.62 vs NTLA's 2.37
Among these 5 stocks, NTLA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 232.6% revenue growth vs RNAZ's -87.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.2% margin vs RADX's -10.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.62 vs NTLA's 2.37 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +496.9% vs RNAZ's -19.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.2% ROA vs RADX's -48.4%, ROIC 4.9% vs -254.1% |
RADX vs RNAZ vs ARWR vs RNW vs NTLA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
RADX vs RNAZ vs ARWR vs RNW vs NTLA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RNW leads in 2 of 6 categories
ARWR leads 1 • RADX leads 0 • RNAZ leads 0 • NTLA leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RNW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RNW and RNAZ operate at a comparable scale, with $129.7B and $0 in trailing revenue. RNW is the more profitable business, keeping 9.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RADX's -10.6%. On growth, NTLA holds the edge at +78.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $0 | $622M | $129.7B | $68M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$17M | -$203M | $86.9B | -$431M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$27M | -$301M | $12.0B | -$413M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$15M | -$51M | -$23.8B | -$396M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +1.1% | — | +85.1% | +77.9% | -25.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -10.5% | — | -35.7% | +48.4% | -6.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -10.6% | — | -48.4% | +9.2% | -6.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -10.1% | — | -8.2% | -18.4% | -5.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | -86.4% | +37.2% | +78.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -380.7% | -133.8% | +94.8% | +34.6% |
Valuation Metrics
RNW leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, RNW's 11.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ARWR's 90.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $33M | $7M | $10.9B | $1.3B | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12M | $896,691 | $11.1B | $8.6B | $1.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.08x | -0.17x | -6389.34x | 46.91x | -3.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 0.40x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 90.41x | 11.27x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 12.42x | — | 13.16x | 1.30x | 23.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.93x | — | 20.71x | 1.43x | 2.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 69.58x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — ARWR and RNW each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RNW delivers a 8.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-109 for RADX. NTLA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RNW's 5.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARWR scores 6/9 vs NTLA's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -109.2% | -1.9% | -55.5% | +8.4% | -56.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -48.4% | -0.5% | -18.1% | +1.2% | -45.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.5% | — | +9.3% | +4.9% | -44.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -60.6% | -5.1% | +8.8% | +6.9% | -48.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 0.73x | 5.59x | 0.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$29M | -$6M | $140M | $691.9B | -$62M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $29M | $6M | $227M | $40.4B | $155M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $38,291 | $366M | $732.3B | $93M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -584.59x | -3431.07x | -1.03x | 86.76x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ARWR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARWR five years ago would be worth $11,743 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for RNAZ. Over the past 12 months, ARWR leads with a +496.9% total return vs RNAZ's -19.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARWR at 24.4% vs RNAZ's -96.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.6% | +8.1% | +15.0% | -7.8% | +48.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -4.4% | -19.6% | +496.9% | -17.7% | +88.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.5% | -100.0% | +92.7% | +4.4% | -68.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.5% | -100.0% | +17.4% | -45.7% | -79.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.5% | -100.0% | +1253.3% | -50.5% | -42.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -38.3% | -96.3% | +24.4% | +1.5% | -31.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ARWR and RNW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RNW is the less volatile stock with a 0.62 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NTLA's 2.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ARWR currently trades 98.1% from its 52-week high vs RADX's 25.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.88x | 0.95x | 1.81x | 0.62x | 2.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.25 | $20.99 | $79.48 | $8.24 | $28.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.62 | $6.08 | $12.44 | $4.38 | $6.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +25.5% | +38.1% | +98.1% | +65.5% | +48.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.3 | 31.2 | 69.7 | 64.1 | 50.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 184K | 8K | 1.9M | 734K | 5.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ARWR as "Buy", RNW as "Buy", NTLA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 52.3% upside for NTLA (target: $21) vs 4.2% for ARWR (target: $81).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $81.22 | $6.52 | $20.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 20 | 6 | 39 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RNW leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ARWR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
RADX vs RNAZ vs ARWR vs RNW vs NTLA: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RADX or RNAZ or ARWR or RNW or NTLA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ARWR) is the stronger pick with 232. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 16. 9% for Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA). ReNew Energy Global Plc (RNW) offers the better valuation at 46. 9x trailing P/E (0. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ARWR) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — RADX or RNAZ or ARWR or RNW or NTLA?
Over the past 5 years, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ARWR) delivered a total return of +17. 4%, compared to -100. 0% for TransCode Therapeutics, Inc. (RNAZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARWR returned +1253% versus RNAZ's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — RADX or RNAZ or ARWR or RNW or NTLA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ReNew Energy Global Plc (RNW) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
62β versus Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. 's 2. 37β — meaning NTLA is approximately 280% more volatile than RNW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 6% for ReNew Energy Global Plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — RADX or RNAZ or ARWR or RNW or NTLA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ARWR) is pulling ahead at 232. 6% versus 16. 9% for Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 99. 8% year-over-year, compared to 10. 1% for ReNew Energy Global Plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, RADX leads at 643. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — RADX or RNAZ or ARWR or RNW or NTLA?
ReNew Energy Global Plc (RNW) is the more profitable company, earning 3.
9% net margin versus -1055. 3% for Radiopharm Theranostics Limited — meaning it keeps 3. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RNW leads at 53. 5% versus -1050. 6% for RADX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARWR leads at 97. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is RADX or RNAZ or ARWR or RNW or NTLA more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NTLA: 52.
3% to $20. 88.
07Which pays a better dividend — RADX or RNAZ or ARWR or RNW or NTLA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is RADX or RNAZ or ARWR or RNW or NTLA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ReNew Energy Global Plc (RNW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
62)). Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA) carries a higher beta of 2. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RNW: -50. 5%, NTLA: -42. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between RADX and RNAZ and ARWR and RNW and NTLA?
These companies operate in different sectors (RADX (Healthcare) and RNAZ (Healthcare) and ARWR (Healthcare) and RNW (Utilities) and NTLA (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RADX is a small-cap high-growth stock; RNAZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; RNW is a small-cap high-growth stock; NTLA is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.