Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RADX vs RNW vs RNAZ vs ARWR vs CWEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Renewable Utilities
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Renewable Utilities
RADX vs RNW vs RNAZ vs ARWR vs CWEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Renewable Utilities | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Renewable Utilities |
| Market Cap | $33M | $1.33B | $7M | $10.92B | $7.84B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $129.66B | $0.00 | $622M | $1.43B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-38M | $11.97B | $-27M | $-301M | $169M |
| Gross Margin | 1.1% | 77.9% | — | 85.1% | 50.3% |
| Operating Margin | -10.5% | 48.4% | — | -35.7% | 12.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 0.4x | — | — | 26.9x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $732.28B | $38K | $366M | $10.20B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $29M | $40.42B | $6M | $227M | $818M |
RADX vs RNW vs RNAZ vs ARWR vs CWEN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Radiopharm Theranos… (RADX) | 100 | 92.4 | -7.6% |
| ReNew Energy Global… (RNW) | 100 | 79.1 | -20.9% |
| TransCode Therapeut… (RNAZ) | 100 | 12.1 | -87.9% |
| Arrowhead Pharmaceu… (ARWR) | 100 | 414.6 | +314.6% |
| Clearway Energy, In… (CWEN) | 100 | 146.7 | +46.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RADX vs RNW vs RNAZ vs ARWR vs CWEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RADX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
RNW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and efficiency is your priority.
- Better valuation composite
- 1.2% ROA vs RADX's -48.4%, ROIC 4.9% vs -254.1%
Among these 5 stocks, RNAZ doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ARWR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 232.6%, EPS growth 99.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 50.5%
- 12.5% 10Y total return vs CWEN's 237.4%
- 232.6% revenue growth vs RNAZ's -87.4%
- +496.9% vs RNAZ's -19.6%
CWEN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.54, yield 7.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.54, current ratio 1.13x
- Beta 0.54, yield 7.9%, current ratio 1.13x
- 11.8% margin vs RADX's -10.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 232.6% revenue growth vs RNAZ's -87.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.8% margin vs RADX's -10.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.54 vs ARWR's 1.81 | |
| Dividends | 7.9% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +496.9% vs RNAZ's -19.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.2% ROA vs RADX's -48.4%, ROIC 4.9% vs -254.1% |
RADX vs RNW vs RNAZ vs ARWR vs CWEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
RADX vs RNW vs RNAZ vs ARWR vs CWEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ARWR leads in 2 of 6 categories
RNW leads 1 • CWEN leads 1 • RADX leads 0 • RNAZ leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RNW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RNW and RNAZ operate at a comparable scale, with $129.7B and $0 in trailing revenue. CWEN is the more profitable business, keeping 11.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RADX's -10.6%. On growth, RNW holds the edge at +37.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $129.7B | $0 | $622M | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $86.9B | -$17M | -$203M | $1.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $12.0B | -$27M | -$301M | $169M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$23.8B | -$15M | -$51M | $268M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +1.1% | +77.9% | — | +85.1% | +50.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -10.5% | +48.4% | — | -35.7% | +12.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -10.6% | +9.2% | — | -48.4% | +11.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -10.1% | -18.4% | — | -8.2% | +18.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +37.2% | — | -86.4% | +21.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +94.8% | -380.7% | -133.8% | -35.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — RNW and CWEN each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.9x trailing earnings, CWEN trades at a 43% valuation discount to RNW's 46.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RNW's 11.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ARWR's 90.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $33M | $1.3B | $7M | $10.9B | $7.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12M | $8.6B | $896,691 | $11.1B | $17.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.08x | 46.91x | -0.17x | -6389.34x | 26.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 0.40x | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.59x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.27x | — | 90.41x | 16.23x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 12.42x | 1.30x | — | 13.16x | 5.48x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.93x | 1.43x | — | 20.71x | 0.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 69.58x | 21.24x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ARWR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RNW delivers a 8.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-109 for RADX. ARWR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.73x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RNW's 5.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARWR scores 6/9 vs CWEN's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -109.2% | +8.4% | -1.9% | -55.5% | +3.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -48.4% | +1.2% | -0.5% | -18.1% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.5% | +4.9% | — | +9.3% | +0.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -60.6% | +6.9% | -5.1% | +8.8% | +1.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 5.59x | — | 0.73x | 1.72x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$29M | $691.9B | -$6M | $140M | $9.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $29M | $40.4B | $6M | $227M | $818M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $732.3B | $38,291 | $366M | $10.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -584.59x | 86.76x | -3431.07x | -1.03x | 0.55x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ARWR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CWEN five years ago would be worth $17,246 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for RNAZ. Over the past 12 months, ARWR leads with a +496.9% total return vs RNAZ's -19.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARWR at 24.4% vs RNAZ's -96.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.6% | -7.8% | +8.1% | +15.0% | +13.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -4.4% | -17.7% | -19.6% | +496.9% | +39.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.5% | +4.4% | -100.0% | +92.7% | +43.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.5% | -45.7% | -100.0% | +17.4% | +72.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.5% | -50.5% | -100.0% | +1253.3% | +237.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -38.3% | +1.5% | -96.3% | +24.4% | +12.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ARWR and CWEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CWEN is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARWR's 1.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ARWR currently trades 98.1% from its 52-week high vs RADX's 25.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.88x | 0.62x | 0.95x | 1.81x | 0.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.25 | $8.24 | $20.99 | $79.48 | $41.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.62 | $4.38 | $6.08 | $12.44 | $27.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +25.5% | +65.5% | +38.1% | +98.1% | +91.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.3 | 64.1 | 31.2 | 69.7 | 45.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 184K | 734K | 8K | 1.9M | 828K |
Analyst Outlook
CWEN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RNW as "Buy", ARWR as "Buy", CWEN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 20.7% upside for RNW (target: $7) vs 4.2% for ARWR (target: $81). CWEN is the only dividend payer here at 7.89% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $6.52 | — | $81.22 | $43.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 6 | — | 20 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +7.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $3.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ARWR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). RNW leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
RADX vs RNW vs RNAZ vs ARWR vs CWEN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RADX or RNW or RNAZ or ARWR or CWEN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ARWR) is the stronger pick with 232. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 2% for Clearway Energy, Inc. (CWEN). Clearway Energy, Inc. (CWEN) offers the better valuation at 26. 9x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ReNew Energy Global Plc (RNW) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RADX or RNW or RNAZ or ARWR or CWEN?
On trailing P/E, Clearway Energy, Inc.
(CWEN) is the cheapest at 26. 9x versus ReNew Energy Global Plc at 46. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RADX or RNW or RNAZ or ARWR or CWEN?
Over the past 5 years, Clearway Energy, Inc.
(CWEN) delivered a total return of +72. 5%, compared to -100. 0% for TransCode Therapeutics, Inc. (RNAZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARWR returned +1253% versus RNAZ's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RADX or RNW or RNAZ or ARWR or CWEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Clearway Energy, Inc.
(CWEN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 54β versus Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 1. 81β — meaning ARWR is approximately 235% more volatile than CWEN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ARWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 73% versus 6% for ReNew Energy Global Plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RADX or RNW or RNAZ or ARWR or CWEN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ARWR) is pulling ahead at 232. 6% versus 4. 2% for Clearway Energy, Inc. (CWEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 99. 8% year-over-year, compared to 10. 1% for ReNew Energy Global Plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, RADX leads at 643. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RADX or RNW or RNAZ or ARWR or CWEN?
Clearway Energy, Inc.
(CWEN) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 8% net margin versus -1055. 3% for Radiopharm Theranostics Limited — meaning it keeps 11. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RNW leads at 53. 5% versus -1050. 6% for RADX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARWR leads at 97. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RADX or RNW or RNAZ or ARWR or CWEN more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RNW: 20.
7% to $6. 52.
08Which pays a better dividend — RADX or RNW or RNAZ or ARWR or CWEN?
In this comparison, CWEN (7.
9% yield) pays a dividend. RADX, RNW, RNAZ, ARWR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RADX or RNW or RNAZ or ARWR or CWEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Clearway Energy, Inc.
(CWEN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 54), 7. 9% yield, +237. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CWEN: +237. 4%, RNAZ: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RADX and RNW and RNAZ and ARWR and CWEN?
These companies operate in different sectors (RADX (Healthcare) and RNW (Utilities) and RNAZ (Healthcare) and ARWR (Healthcare) and CWEN (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RADX is a small-cap high-growth stock; RNW is a small-cap high-growth stock; RNAZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CWEN is a small-cap income-oriented stock. CWEN pays a dividend while RADX, RNW, RNAZ, ARWR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.