Railroads
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
RAIL vs TRN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Railroads
RAIL vs TRN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Railroads | Railroads |
| Market Cap | $254M | $2.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $469M | $2.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $29M | $255M |
| Gross Margin | 14.8% | 27.0% |
| Operating Margin | 6.3% | 16.6% |
| Forward P/E | 16.3x | 18.8x |
| Total Debt | $152M | $5.44B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $64M | $201M |
RAIL vs TRN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FreightCar America,… (RAIL) | 100 | 665.0 | +565.0% |
| Trinity Industries,… (TRN) | 100 | 183.5 | +83.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RAIL vs TRN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RAIL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -10.4%, EPS growth 134.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.2%
- -10.4% revenue growth vs TRN's -30.0%
- Lower P/E (16.3x vs 18.8x)
TRN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.97, yield 3.2%
- 261.3% 10Y total return vs RAIL's -37.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.97, current ratio 2.12x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -10.4% revenue growth vs TRN's -30.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.3x vs 18.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.4% margin vs RAIL's 6.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.97 vs RAIL's 2.06 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.0% vs RAIL's +30.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.4% ROA vs TRN's 3.0% |
RAIL vs TRN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RAIL vs TRN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRN is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.1B annually — 4.4x RAIL's $469M. TRN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RAIL's 6.2%. On growth, TRN holds the edge at -16.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $469M | $2.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $34M | $646M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $29M | $255M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $14M | -$283M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.8% | +27.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.3% | +16.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | +12.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.1% | -13.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -33.2% | -16.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -24.3% | +15.4% |
Valuation Metrics
RAIL leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.3x trailing earnings, RAIL trades at a 39% valuation discount to TRN's 12.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RAIL's 8.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TRN's 12.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $254M | $2.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $342M | $8.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.32x | 12.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.29x | 18.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.52x | 12.31x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.51x | 1.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.08x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
RAIL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TRN scores 8/9 vs RAIL's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +21.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.4% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +4.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +19.5% | +4.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 4.75x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $88M | $5.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $64M | $201M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $152M | $5.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.57x | 1.29x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRN five years ago would be worth $14,024 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,488 for RAIL. Over the past 12 months, TRN leads with a +57.0% total return vs RAIL's +30.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RAIL at 40.7% vs TRN's 23.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -27.0% | +38.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +30.8% | +57.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +178.5% | +88.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.9% | +40.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.0% | +261.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +40.7% | +23.4% |
Risk & Volatility
TRN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TRN is the less volatile stock with a 0.97 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RAIL's 2.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRN currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs RAIL's 53.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.06x | 0.97x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.90 | $37.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.02 | $22.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +53.6% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.1 | 64.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 198K | 575K |
Analyst Outlook
TRN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates RAIL as "Hold" and TRN as "Hold". TRN is the only dividend payer here at 3.25% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $35.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.19 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.4% |
TRN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). RAIL leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
RAIL vs TRN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RAIL or TRN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, FreightCar America, Inc.
(RAIL) is the stronger pick with -10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -30. 0% for Trinity Industries, Inc. (TRN). FreightCar America, Inc. (RAIL) offers the better valuation at 7. 3x trailing P/E (16. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FreightCar America, Inc. (RAIL) a "Hold" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RAIL or TRN?
On trailing P/E, FreightCar America, Inc.
(RAIL) is the cheapest at 7. 3x versus Trinity Industries, Inc. at 12. 0x. On forward P/E, FreightCar America, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RAIL or TRN?
Over the past 5 years, Trinity Industries, Inc.
(TRN) delivered a total return of +40. 2%, compared to +24. 9% for FreightCar America, Inc. (RAIL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRN returned +261. 3% versus RAIL's -37. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RAIL or TRN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Trinity Industries, Inc.
(TRN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 97β versus FreightCar America, Inc. 's 2. 06β — meaning RAIL is approximately 112% more volatile than TRN relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — RAIL or TRN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), FreightCar America, Inc.
(RAIL) is pulling ahead at -10. 4% versus -30. 0% for Trinity Industries, Inc. (TRN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FreightCar America, Inc. grew EPS 134. 9% year-over-year, compared to 86. 0% for Trinity Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RAIL leads at 11. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RAIL or TRN?
Trinity Industries, Inc.
(TRN) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 7% net margin versus 7. 6% for FreightCar America, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRN leads at 16. 6% versus 6. 8% for RAIL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRN leads at 26. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RAIL or TRN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, FreightCar America, Inc.
(RAIL) trades at 16. 3x forward P/E versus 18. 8x for Trinity Industries, Inc. — 2. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — RAIL or TRN?
In this comparison, TRN (3.
2% yield) pays a dividend. RAIL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RAIL or TRN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Trinity Industries, Inc.
(TRN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 97), 3. 2% yield, +261. 3% 10Y return). FreightCar America, Inc. (RAIL) carries a higher beta of 2. 06 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRN: +261. 3%, RAIL: -37. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RAIL and TRN?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
TRN pays a dividend while RAIL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.