Railroads
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RAIL vs TRN vs GNSS vs GBX vs WAB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Railroads
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Railroads
Railroads
RAIL vs TRN vs GNSS vs GBX vs WAB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Railroads | Railroads | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Railroads | Railroads |
| Market Cap | $254M | $2.93B | $90M | $1.56B | $45.09B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $469M | $2.06B | $51M | $3.06B | $11.51B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $29M | $255M | $-15M | $185M | $1.21B |
| Gross Margin | 14.8% | 27.0% | 43.2% | 17.3% | 33.8% |
| Operating Margin | 6.3% | 16.6% | -22.1% | 9.4% | 16.1% |
| Forward P/E | 16.3x | 18.8x | — | 16.0x | 25.0x |
| Total Debt | $152M | $5.44B | $21M | $1.84B | $5.54B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $64M | $201M | $8M | $326M | $789M |
RAIL vs TRN vs GNSS vs GBX vs WAB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FreightCar America,… (RAIL) | 100 | 665.0 | +565.0% |
| Trinity Industries,… (TRN) | 100 | 183.5 | +83.5% |
| Genasys Inc. (GNSS) | 100 | 43.7 | -56.3% |
| The Greenbrier Comp… (GBX) | 100 | 237.6 | +137.6% |
| Westinghouse Air Br… (WAB) | 100 | 435.1 | +335.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RAIL vs TRN vs GNSS vs GBX vs WAB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RAIL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for efficiency.
- 9.4% ROA vs GNSS's -22.0%
TRN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.97, yield 3.2%
- 261.3% 10Y total return vs WAB's 247.1%
- 12.4% margin vs GNSS's -29.2%
- 3.2% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs WAB's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
GNSS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 69.8%, EPS growth 44.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -9.0%
- 69.8% revenue growth vs TRN's -30.0%
- Beta 0.87 vs RAIL's 2.06
GBX is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.97, current ratio 2.80x
- PEG 0.47 vs WAB's 0.97
- Beta 0.97, yield 2.4%, current ratio 2.80x
- Lower P/E (16.0x vs 25.0x), PEG 0.47 vs 0.97
Among these 5 stocks, WAB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 69.8% revenue growth vs TRN's -30.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.0x vs 25.0x), PEG 0.47 vs 0.97 | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.4% margin vs GNSS's -29.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs RAIL's 2.06 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs WAB's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.0% vs GNSS's +2.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.4% ROA vs GNSS's -22.0% |
RAIL vs TRN vs GNSS vs GBX vs WAB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RAIL vs TRN vs GNSS vs GBX vs WAB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TRN leads in 2 of 6 categories
GNSS leads 1 • GBX leads 1 • WAB leads 1 • RAIL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GNSS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WAB is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.5B annually — 226.2x GNSS's $51M. TRN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GNSS's -29.2%. On growth, GNSS holds the edge at +145.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $469M | $2.1B | $51M | $3.1B | $11.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $34M | $646M | -$9M | $413M | $2.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $29M | $255M | -$15M | $185M | $1.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $14M | -$283M | -$3M | $123M | $1.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.8% | +27.0% | +43.2% | +17.3% | +33.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.3% | +16.6% | -22.1% | +9.4% | +16.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | +12.4% | -29.2% | +6.0% | +10.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.1% | -13.7% | -5.3% | +4.0% | +14.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -33.2% | -16.0% | +145.9% | -19.3% | +13.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -24.3% | +15.4% | +78.0% | -33.7% | +12.8% |
Valuation Metrics
GBX leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.3x trailing earnings, RAIL trades at a 81% valuation discount to WAB's 38.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GBX offers better value at 0.23x vs WAB's 1.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $254M | $2.9B | $90M | $1.6B | $45.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $342M | $8.2B | $104M | $3.1B | $49.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.32x | 12.01x | -5.00x | 7.94x | 38.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.29x | 18.79x | — | 16.01x | 25.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.23x | 1.51x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.52x | 12.31x | — | 6.69x | 21.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.51x | 1.36x | 2.22x | 0.48x | 4.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.65x | 41.58x | 0.93x | 4.06x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.08x | — | — | — | 30.08x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WAB leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRN delivers a 21.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-8 for GNSS. WAB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.50x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GNSS's 9.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TRN scores 8/9 vs GNSS's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +21.3% | -8.2% | +10.7% | +10.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.4% | +3.0% | -22.0% | +4.3% | +5.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +4.1% | -56.7% | +7.6% | +9.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +19.5% | +4.7% | -68.2% | +9.1% | +11.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 | 3 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 4.75x | 9.85x | 1.06x | 0.50x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $88M | $5.2B | $13M | $1.5B | $4.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $64M | $201M | $8M | $326M | $789M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $152M | $5.4B | $21M | $1.8B | $5.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.57x | 1.29x | -31.66x | 3.87x | 7.41x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WAB five years ago would be worth $32,899 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,328 for GNSS. Over the past 12 months, TRN leads with a +57.0% total return vs GNSS's +2.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RAIL at 40.7% vs GNSS's -11.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -27.0% | +38.3% | -8.3% | +8.0% | +23.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +30.8% | +57.0% | +2.6% | +20.6% | +40.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +178.5% | +88.1% | -31.3% | +102.8% | +170.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.9% | +40.2% | -66.7% | +14.7% | +229.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.0% | +261.3% | +14.9% | +130.7% | +247.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +40.7% | +23.4% | -11.8% | +26.6% | +39.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TRN and GNSS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GNSS is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RAIL's 2.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRN currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs RAIL's 53.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.06x | 0.97x | 0.87x | 0.97x | 1.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.90 | $37.27 | $2.70 | $59.19 | $275.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.02 | $22.38 | $1.40 | $38.23 | $184.26 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +53.6% | +98.3% | +74.1% | +85.2% | +96.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.1 | 64.1 | 59.9 | 50.5 | 58.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 198K | 575K | 95K | 405K | 905K |
Analyst Outlook
TRN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RAIL as "Hold", TRN as "Hold", GBX as "Buy", WAB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 9.5% upside for WAB (target: $291) vs -4.5% for TRN (target: $35). For income investors, TRN offers the higher dividend yield at 3.25% vs WAB's 0.38%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $35.00 | — | $49.00 | $291.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 25 | — | 24 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.2% | — | +2.4% | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 15 | 1 | 12 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.19 | — | $1.23 | $1.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.4% | 0.0% | +1.5% | +0.5% |
TRN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). GNSS leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
RAIL vs TRN vs GNSS vs GBX vs WAB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RAIL or TRN or GNSS or GBX or WAB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Genasys Inc.
(GNSS) is the stronger pick with 69. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -30. 0% for Trinity Industries, Inc. (TRN). FreightCar America, Inc. (RAIL) offers the better valuation at 7. 3x trailing P/E (16. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. (GBX) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RAIL or TRN or GNSS or GBX or WAB?
On trailing P/E, FreightCar America, Inc.
(RAIL) is the cheapest at 7. 3x versus Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation at 38. 9x. On forward P/E, The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. wins at 0. 47x versus Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation's 0. 97x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RAIL or TRN or GNSS or GBX or WAB?
Over the past 5 years, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) delivered a total return of +229.
0%, compared to -66. 7% for Genasys Inc. (GNSS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRN returned +261. 3% versus RAIL's -37. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RAIL or TRN or GNSS or GBX or WAB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Genasys Inc.
(GNSS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 87β versus FreightCar America, Inc. 's 2. 06β — meaning RAIL is approximately 137% more volatile than GNSS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 50% versus 10% for Genasys Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RAIL or TRN or GNSS or GBX or WAB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Genasys Inc.
(GNSS) is pulling ahead at 69. 8% versus -30. 0% for Trinity Industries, Inc. (TRN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FreightCar America, Inc. grew EPS 134. 9% year-over-year, compared to 13. 1% for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, RAIL leads at 11. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RAIL or TRN or GNSS or GBX or WAB?
Trinity Industries, Inc.
(TRN) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 7% net margin versus -44. 4% for Genasys Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WAB leads at 16. 7% versus -41. 2% for GNSS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GNSS leads at 41. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RAIL or TRN or GNSS or GBX or WAB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. (GBX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 47x versus Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation's 0. 97x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. (GBX) trades at 16. 0x forward P/E versus 25. 0x for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation — 9. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WAB: 9. 5% to $291. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — RAIL or TRN or GNSS or GBX or WAB?
In this comparison, TRN (3.
2% yield), GBX (2. 4% yield), WAB (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. RAIL, GNSS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RAIL or TRN or GNSS or GBX or WAB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Trinity Industries, Inc.
(TRN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 97), 3. 2% yield, +261. 3% 10Y return). FreightCar America, Inc. (RAIL) carries a higher beta of 2. 06 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRN: +261. 3%, RAIL: -37. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RAIL and TRN and GNSS and GBX and WAB?
These companies operate in different sectors (RAIL (Industrials) and TRN (Industrials) and GNSS (Technology) and GBX (Industrials) and WAB (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RAIL is a small-cap deep-value stock; TRN is a small-cap deep-value stock; GNSS is a small-cap high-growth stock; GBX is a small-cap deep-value stock; WAB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. TRN, GBX pay a dividend while RAIL, GNSS, WAB do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.