Renewable Utilities
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
RAIN vs GREE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
RAIN vs GREE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Renewable Utilities | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $3M | $19M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $60M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-6M | $-2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 79.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | -19.2% |
| Total Debt | $4M | $68M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $33K | $9M |
RAIN vs GREE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rain Enhancement Te… (RAIN) | 100 | 39.0 | -61.0% |
| Greenidge Generatio… (GREE) | 100 | 89.7 | -10.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RAIN vs GREE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RAIN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.20
- Lower volatility, beta 1.20, current ratio 0.12x
- Beta 1.20, current ratio 0.12x
GREE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -15.4%, EPS growth 57.6%
- -62.9% 10Y total return vs RAIN's -80.0%
- -15.4% NII/revenue growth vs RAIN's -121.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -15.4% NII/revenue growth vs RAIN's -121.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | -2.4% margin vs GREE's -33.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.20 vs GREE's 3.33 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.0% vs RAIN's -75.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -3.2% ROA vs RAIN's -298.9% |
RAIN vs GREE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RAIN vs GREE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GREE and RAIN operate at a comparable scale, with $60M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $60M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | $4M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$6M | -$2M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | -$20M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +79.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -19.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -33.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -37.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
GREE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $19M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6M | $79M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.64x | -0.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 38.86x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — RAIN and GREE each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.0% | -3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -57.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -23.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | $59M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $32,604 | $9M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $68M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -148.90x | 0.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GREE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RAIN five years ago would be worth $2,000 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $82 for GREE. Over the past 12 months, GREE leads with a +29.0% total return vs RAIN's -75.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GREE at -33.8% vs RAIN's -41.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -70.8% | -25.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -75.1% | +29.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.0% | -71.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.0% | -99.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.0% | -62.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -41.5% | -33.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RAIN and GREE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RAIN is the less volatile stock with a 1.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GREE's 3.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GREE currently trades 50.4% from its 52-week high vs RAIN's 15.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.20x | 3.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.58 | $2.42 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.43 | $0.87 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +15.2% | +50.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 33.7 | 52.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 19K | 138K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
GREE leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Total Returns. 2 categories are tied.
RAIN vs GREE: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Which is the better long-term investment — RAIN or GREE?
Over the past 5 years, Rain Enhancement Technologies Holdco Inc (RAIN) delivered a total return of -80.
0%, compared to -99. 2% for Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. (GREE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GREE returned -62. 9% versus RAIN's -80. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
02Which is safer — RAIN or GREE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Rain Enhancement Technologies Holdco Inc (RAIN) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
20β versus Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. 's 3. 33β — meaning GREE is approximately 177% more volatile than RAIN relative to the S&P 500.
03Which is growing faster — RAIN or GREE?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc.
grew EPS 57. 6% year-over-year, compared to -34. 9% for Rain Enhancement Technologies Holdco Inc. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
04Which has better profit margins — RAIN or GREE?
Rain Enhancement Technologies Holdco Inc (RAIN) is the more profitable company, earning 0.
0% net margin versus -33. 2% for Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RAIN leads at 0. 0% versus -19. 2% for GREE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GREE leads at 79. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — RAIN or GREE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is RAIN or GREE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Rain Enhancement Technologies Holdco Inc (RAIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
20)). Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. (GREE) carries a higher beta of 3. 33 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RAIN: -80. 0%, GREE: -62. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between RAIN and GREE?
These companies operate in different sectors (RAIN (Utilities) and GREE (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.