Renewable Utilities
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
RAIN vs GREE vs MARA vs OESX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
Financial - Capital Markets
Electrical Equipment & Parts
RAIN vs GREE vs MARA vs OESX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Renewable Utilities | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Capital Markets | Electrical Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $3M | $19M | $4.83B | $33M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $60M | $907M | $81M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-6M | $-2M | $-1.31B | $-5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 79.7% | -47.7% | 29.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | -19.2% | -90.6% | -4.3% |
| Total Debt | $4M | $68M | $3.65B | $10M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $33K | $9M | $547M | $6M |
RAIN vs GREE vs MARA vs OESX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rain Enhancement Te… (RAIN) | 100 | 39.0 | -61.0% |
| Greenidge Generatio… (GREE) | 100 | 89.7 | -10.3% |
| Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA) | 100 | 69.2 | -30.8% |
| Orion Energy System… (OESX) | 100 | 117.1 | +17.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RAIN vs GREE vs MARA vs OESX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RAIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality is your priority.
- -2.4% margin vs MARA's -144.6%
GREE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
MARA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 38.2%, EPS growth -314.5%
- -51.6% 10Y total return vs OESX's -32.5%
- 38.2% NII/revenue growth vs RAIN's -121.2%
OESX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.10
- Lower volatility, beta 1.10, Low D/E 86.9%, current ratio 1.32x
- Beta 1.10, current ratio 1.32x
- Beta 1.10 vs GREE's 3.33
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 38.2% NII/revenue growth vs RAIN's -121.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | -2.4% margin vs MARA's -144.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.10 vs GREE's 3.33 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +31.2% vs RAIN's -75.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.0% ROA vs RAIN's -298.9% |
RAIN vs GREE vs MARA vs OESX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RAIN vs GREE vs MARA vs OESX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
OESX leads in 2 of 6 categories
MARA leads 2 • RAIN leads 0 • GREE leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OESX leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MARA and RAIN operate at a comparable scale, with $907M and $0 in trailing revenue. OESX is the more profitable business, keeping -5.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MARA's -144.6%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $60M | $907M | $81M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | $4M | $627M | -$1M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$6M | -$2M | -$1.3B | -$5M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | -$20M | -$312M | $348M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +79.7% | -47.7% | +29.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -19.2% | -90.6% | -4.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -33.2% | -144.6% | -5.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -37.7% | -34.4% | +4.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +7.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +2.3% | -4.8% | +109.6% |
Valuation Metrics
MARA leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $19M | $4.8B | $33M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6M | $79M | $7.9B | $37M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.64x | -0.65x | -3.44x | -2.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 38.86x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.32x | 5.32x | 0.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — | 1.30x | 2.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 66.51x |
Profitability & Efficiency
OESX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OESX delivers a -0.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-0 in annual profit, vs $-31 for MARA. OESX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.87x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MARA's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OESX scores 4/9 vs MARA's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | — | -30.5% | -0.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.0% | -3.2% | -17.1% | -0.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -57.2% | -9.0% | -34.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -23.9% | -12.1% | -34.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 1.05x | 0.87x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | $59M | $3.1B | $4M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $32,604 | $9M | $547M | $6M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $68M | $3.6B | $10M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -148.90x | 0.70x | 4.73x | -3.29x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MARA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MARA five years ago would be worth $4,054 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $82 for GREE. Over the past 12 months, OESX leads with a +31.2% total return vs RAIN's -75.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MARA at 10.8% vs RAIN's -41.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -70.8% | -25.6% | +28.2% | -38.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -75.1% | +29.0% | -4.7% | +31.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.0% | -71.0% | +36.1% | -38.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.0% | -99.2% | -59.5% | -83.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.0% | -62.9% | -51.6% | -32.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -41.5% | -33.8% | +10.8% | -15.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MARA and OESX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OESX is the less volatile stock with a 1.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GREE's 3.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MARA currently trades 54.2% from its 52-week high vs RAIN's 15.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.20x | 3.33x | 3.11x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.58 | $2.42 | $23.45 | $18.64 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.43 | $0.87 | $6.66 | $5.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +15.2% | +50.4% | +54.2% | +49.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 33.7 | 52.9 | 69.6 | 41.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 19K | 138K | 47.6M | 39K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $16.13 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 19 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.0% | +0.0% |
OESX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MARA leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
RAIN vs GREE vs MARA vs OESX: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RAIN or GREE or MARA or OESX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
(MARA) is the stronger pick with 38. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 4% for Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. (GREE). Analysts rate Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — RAIN or GREE or MARA or OESX?
Over the past 5 years, Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
(MARA) delivered a total return of -59. 5%, compared to -99. 2% for Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. (GREE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OESX returned -32. 5% versus RAIN's -80. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — RAIN or GREE or MARA or OESX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Orion Energy Systems, Inc.
(OESX) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 10β versus Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. 's 3. 33β — meaning GREE is approximately 204% more volatile than OESX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Orion Energy Systems, Inc. (OESX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 87% versus 105% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — RAIN or GREE or MARA or OESX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
(MARA) is pulling ahead at 38. 2% versus -15. 4% for Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. (GREE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. grew EPS 57. 6% year-over-year, compared to -34. 9% for Rain Enhancement Technologies Holdco Inc. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — RAIN or GREE or MARA or OESX?
Rain Enhancement Technologies Holdco Inc (RAIN) is the more profitable company, earning 0.
0% net margin versus -144. 6% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RAIN leads at 0. 0% versus -90. 6% for MARA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GREE leads at 79. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — RAIN or GREE or MARA or OESX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is RAIN or GREE or MARA or OESX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Orion Energy Systems, Inc.
(OESX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 10)). Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. (GREE) carries a higher beta of 3. 33 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OESX: -32. 5%, GREE: -62. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between RAIN and GREE and MARA and OESX?
These companies operate in different sectors (RAIN (Utilities) and GREE (Financial Services) and MARA (Financial Services) and OESX (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RAIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GREE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock; OESX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.