Restaurants
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
RAVE vs ARKR vs TXRH vs DENN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
Restaurants
Restaurants
RAVE vs ARKR vs TXRH vs DENN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $41M | $27M | $10.41B | $322M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13M | $162M | $6.06B | $457M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $-14M | $415M | $10M |
| Gross Margin | 53.4% | 6.9% | 18.7% | 43.8% |
| Operating Margin | 28.3% | -0.5% | 8.2% | 8.4% |
| Forward P/E | 15.3x | — | 25.0x | 15.0x |
| Total Debt | $576K | $86M | $1.89B | $408M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $11M | $135M | $2M |
RAVE vs ARKR vs TXRH vs DENN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| RAVE Restaurant Gro… (RAVE) | 100 | 323.3 | +223.3% |
| Ark Restaurants Cor… (ARKR) | 100 | 60.4 | -39.6% |
| Texas Roadhouse, In… (TXRH) | 100 | 304.6 | +204.6% |
| Denny's Corporation (DENN) | 100 | 57.4 | -42.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RAVE vs ARKR vs TXRH vs DENN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RAVE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.60
- Lower volatility, beta 0.60, Low D/E 4.1%, current ratio 6.61x
- Beta 0.60, current ratio 6.61x
- 23.2% margin vs ARKR's -8.5%
ARKR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
TXRH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 9.4%, EPS growth -5.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.5%
- 288.0% 10Y total return vs RAVE's -42.0%
- 9.4% revenue growth vs ARKR's -9.7%
- 1.7% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
DENN is the clearest fit if your priority is value and momentum.
- Lower P/E (15.0x vs 25.0x)
- +39.8% vs ARKR's -37.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.4% revenue growth vs ARKR's -9.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.0x vs 25.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.2% margin vs ARKR's -8.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.60 vs TXRH's 0.70, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.8% vs ARKR's -37.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.8% ROA vs ARKR's -10.5%, ROIC 21.6% vs -2.6% |
RAVE vs ARKR vs TXRH vs DENN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RAVE vs ARKR vs TXRH vs DENN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RAVE leads in 3 of 6 categories
ARKR leads 1 • TXRH leads 1 • DENN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RAVE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TXRH is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.1B annually — 480.0x RAVE's $13M. RAVE is the more profitable business, keeping 23.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ARKR's -8.5%. On growth, TXRH holds the edge at +12.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13M | $162M | $6.1B | $457M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4M | $2M | $709M | $55M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3M | -$14M | $415M | $10M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3M | -$1M | $441M | $2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.4% | +6.9% | +18.7% | +43.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +28.3% | -0.5% | +8.2% | +8.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +23.2% | -8.5% | +6.8% | +2.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.3% | -0.9% | +7.3% | +0.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.7% | -9.4% | +12.8% | +1.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.7% | -71.6% | +10.0% | -89.9% |
Valuation Metrics
ARKR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.2x trailing earnings, DENN trades at a 41% valuation discount to TXRH's 25.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RAVE's 10.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TXRH's 17.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $41M | $27M | $10.4B | $322M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $39M | $101M | $12.2B | $728M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.32x | -2.33x | 25.89x | 15.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 25.05x | 15.02x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.38x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.28x | — | 17.15x | 12.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.44x | 0.16x | 1.77x | 0.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.99x | 0.83x | 7.09x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.39x | — | 30.44x | 350.62x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RAVE leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TXRH delivers a 37.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $-42 for ARKR. RAVE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARKR's 2.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RAVE scores 8/9 vs TXRH's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.2% | -41.5% | +37.4% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +16.8% | -10.5% | +12.2% | +2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +21.6% | -2.6% | +14.5% | +9.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +22.8% | -3.4% | +20.1% | +11.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 2.67x | 1.27x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | $74M | $1.8B | $406M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $11M | $135M | $2M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $576,000 | $86M | $1.9B | $408M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.23x | -21.75x | — | 1.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RAVE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RAVE five years ago would be worth $22,045 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,507 for DENN. Over the past 12 months, DENN leads with a +39.8% total return vs ARKR's -37.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RAVE at 24.7% vs ARKR's -21.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.8% | +12.0% | -7.4% | +0.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +16.9% | -37.3% | -6.2% | +39.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +94.0% | -52.4% | +53.6% | -41.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +120.5% | -55.9% | +61.6% | -64.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.0% | -36.1% | +288.0% | -42.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.7% | -21.9% | +15.4% | -16.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ARKR and DENN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ARKR is the less volatile stock with a -0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TXRH's 0.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DENN currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs ARKR's 58.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.60x | -0.42x | 0.70x | 0.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.75 | $12.60 | $199.99 | $6.26 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.25 | $5.98 | $153.82 | $3.36 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.6% | +58.7% | +79.0% | +99.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.5 | 53.4 | 45.7 | 66.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 55K | 5K | 983K | 0 |
Analyst Outlook
TXRH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TXRH as "Hold", DENN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 21.3% upside for TXRH (target: $192) vs -4.0% for DENN (target: $6). TXRH is the only dividend payer here at 1.72% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $191.64 | $6.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 43 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.71 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.9% | 0.0% | +1.4% | +3.6% |
RAVE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ARKR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
RAVE vs ARKR vs TXRH vs DENN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RAVE or ARKR or TXRH or DENN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) is the stronger pick with 9. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 7% for Ark Restaurants Corp. (ARKR). Denny's Corporation (DENN) offers the better valuation at 15. 2x trailing P/E (15. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Denny's Corporation (DENN) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RAVE or ARKR or TXRH or DENN?
On trailing P/E, Denny's Corporation (DENN) is the cheapest at 15.
2x versus Texas Roadhouse, Inc. at 25. 9x. On forward P/E, Denny's Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RAVE or ARKR or TXRH or DENN?
Over the past 5 years, RAVE Restaurant Group, Inc.
(RAVE) delivered a total return of +120. 5%, compared to -64. 9% for Denny's Corporation (DENN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TXRH returned +288. 0% versus DENN's -42. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RAVE or ARKR or TXRH or DENN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ark Restaurants Corp.
(ARKR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 42β versus Texas Roadhouse, Inc. 's 0. 70β — meaning TXRH is approximately -266% more volatile than ARKR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, RAVE Restaurant Group, Inc. (RAVE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 3% for Ark Restaurants Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RAVE or ARKR or TXRH or DENN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) is pulling ahead at 9. 4% versus -9. 7% for Ark Restaurants Corp. (ARKR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Denny's Corporation grew EPS 17. 1% year-over-year, compared to -194. 4% for Ark Restaurants Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TXRH leads at 13. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RAVE or ARKR or TXRH or DENN?
RAVE Restaurant Group, Inc.
(RAVE) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 4% net margin versus -6. 9% for Ark Restaurants Corp. — meaning it keeps 22. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RAVE leads at 27. 1% versus -2. 5% for ARKR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DENN leads at 73. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RAVE or ARKR or TXRH or DENN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Denny's Corporation (DENN) trades at 15.
0x forward P/E versus 25. 0x for Texas Roadhouse, Inc. — 10. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TXRH: 21. 3% to $191. 64.
08Which pays a better dividend — RAVE or ARKR or TXRH or DENN?
In this comparison, TXRH (1.
7% yield) pays a dividend. RAVE, ARKR, DENN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RAVE or ARKR or TXRH or DENN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ark Restaurants Corp.
(ARKR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 42)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ARKR: -36. 1%, DENN: -42. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RAVE and ARKR and TXRH and DENN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RAVE is a small-cap deep-value stock; ARKR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TXRH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; DENN is a small-cap deep-value stock. TXRH pays a dividend while RAVE, ARKR, DENN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.