RBA vs CPRT

For growth investors, Copart, Inc.

(CPRT) is the stronger pick with 9. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 0% for RB Global, Inc. (RBA). Copart, Inc. (CPRT) offers the better valuation at 21. 3x trailing P/E (21. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate RB Global, Inc. (RBA) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Copart, Inc.

(CPRT) is the cheapest at 21. 3x versus RB Global, Inc. at 49. 7x. On forward P/E, Copart, Inc. is actually cheaper at 21. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Copart, Inc. wins at 1. 28x versus RB Global, Inc. 's 3. 82x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, RB Global, Inc.

(RBA) delivered a total return of +63. 9%, compared to +8. 8% for Copart, Inc. (CPRT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CPRT returned +527. 2% versus RBA's +270. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Copart, Inc.

(CPRT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus RB Global, Inc. 's 0. 68β — meaning RBA is approximately 31% more volatile than CPRT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Copart, Inc. (CPRT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 91% for RB Global, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Copart, Inc.

(CPRT) is pulling ahead at 9. 7% versus 9. 0% for RB Global, Inc. (RBA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Copart, Inc. grew EPS 13. 6% year-over-year, compared to 3. 5% for RB Global, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RBA leads at 39. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Copart, Inc.

(CPRT) is the more profitable company, earning 33. 4% net margin versus 9. 3% for RB Global, Inc. — meaning it keeps 33. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CPRT leads at 36. 5% versus 17. 7% for RBA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CPRT leads at 45. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Copart, Inc. (CPRT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 28x versus RB Global, Inc. 's 3. 82x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Copart, Inc. (CPRT) trades at 21. 5x forward P/E versus 23. 7x for RB Global, Inc. — 2. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RBA: 19. 9% to $124. 00.

In this comparison, RBA (1.

2% yield) pays a dividend. CPRT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, RB Global, Inc.

(RBA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 68), 1. 2% yield, +270. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RBA: +270. 4%, CPRT: +527. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

RBA pays a dividend while CPRT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.