Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RCI vs BCE vs TU vs T vs VZ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
Telecommunications Services
Telecommunications Services
Telecommunications Services
RCI vs BCE vs TU vs T vs VZ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $19.76B | $22.91B | $20.13B | $176.40B | $198.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $20.68B | $24.45B | $20.51B | $126.52B | $138.19B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6.97B | $6.30B | $1.11B | $21.41B | $17.17B |
| Gross Margin | 40.6% | 43.9% | 53.7% | 79.7% | 55.7% |
| Operating Margin | 22.9% | 43.9% | 11.5% | 19.4% | 21.2% |
| Forward P/E | 10.6x | 9.5x | 19.6x | 10.9x | 9.5x |
| Total Debt | $44.18B | $41.06B | $31.46B | $173.99B | $200.59B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.34B | $320M | $2.62B | $18.23B | $19.05B |
RCI vs BCE vs TU vs T vs VZ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rogers Communicatio… (RCI) | 100 | 87.3 | -12.7% |
| BCE Inc. (BCE) | 100 | 59.2 | -40.8% |
| TELUS Corporation (TU) | 100 | 74.3 | -25.7% |
| AT&T Inc. (T) | 100 | 108.5 | +8.5% |
| Verizon Communicati… (VZ) | 100 | 82.1 | -17.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RCI vs BCE vs TU vs T vs VZ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RCI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 5.3%, EPS growth 297.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.1%
- PEG 0.33 vs BCE's 0.43
- 5.3% revenue growth vs BCE's 0.2%
- Better valuation composite
BCE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends and efficiency is your priority.
- 7.0% yield, vs VZ's 5.8%
- 8.3% ROA vs TU's 1.9%, ROIC 6.9% vs 3.9%
TU ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.11, yield 6.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.11, current ratio 0.86x
- Beta 0.11, yield 6.0%, current ratio 0.86x
- Beta 0.11 vs RCI's 0.29
T is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 41.9% 10Y total return vs TU's 46.2%
Among these 5 stocks, VZ doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.3% revenue growth vs BCE's 0.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 33.7% margin vs TU's 5.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.11 vs RCI's 0.29 | |
| Dividends | 7.0% yield, vs VZ's 5.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +49.3% vs T's -6.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.3% ROA vs TU's 1.9%, ROIC 6.9% vs 3.9% |
RCI vs BCE vs TU vs T vs VZ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RCI vs BCE vs TU vs T vs VZ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RCI leads in 1 of 6 categories
T leads 1 • BCE leads 0 • TU leads 0 • VZ leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — BCE and T each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VZ is the larger business by revenue, generating $138.2B annually — 6.7x TU's $20.5B. RCI is the more profitable business, keeping 33.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TU's 5.4%. On growth, T holds the edge at +2.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $20.7B | $24.4B | $20.5B | $126.5B | $138.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $9.3B | $16.0B | $7.6B | $45.1B | $47.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7.0B | $6.3B | $1.1B | $21.4B | $17.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1.1B | $3.0B | $1.7B | $10.6B | $19.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.6% | +43.9% | +53.7% | +79.7% | +55.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.9% | +43.9% | +11.5% | +19.4% | +21.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +33.7% | +25.8% | +5.4% | +16.9% | +12.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.3% | +12.4% | +8.1% | +8.4% | +14.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.8% | -0.6% | +1.1% | +2.9% | +2.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.5% | +27.5% | -25.0% | -11.5% | -53.4% |
Valuation Metrics
RCI leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.9x trailing earnings, RCI trades at a 84% valuation discount to TU's 24.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), RCI offers better value at 0.12x vs BCE's 0.23x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $19.8B | $22.9B | $20.1B | $176.4B | $198.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $51.1B | $52.8B | $41.3B | $332.2B | $380.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 3.92x | 4.94x | 24.44x | 8.31x | 11.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.63x | 9.45x | 19.63x | 10.93x | 9.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.12x | 0.23x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.05x | 6.76x | 8.77x | 7.37x | 7.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.24x | 1.28x | 1.34x | 1.40x | 1.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.11x | 1.34x | 1.63x | 1.41x | 1.88x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.49x | 11.68x | 9.07x | 9.87x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — BCE and TU and T and VZ each lead in 2 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RCI delivers a 30.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $7 for TU. T carries lower financial leverage with a 1.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TU's 1.90x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), T scores 7/9 vs VZ's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +30.9% | +30.7% | +6.7% | +16.8% | +16.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.0% | +8.3% | +1.9% | +5.1% | +4.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.1% | +6.9% | +3.9% | +6.7% | +8.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.5% | +8.6% | +4.8% | +6.8% | +8.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.82x | 1.77x | 1.90x | 1.35x | 1.90x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $42.8B | $40.7B | $28.8B | $155.8B | $181.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.3B | $320M | $2.6B | $18.2B | $19.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $44.2B | $41.1B | $31.5B | $174.0B | $200.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.41x | 5.35x | — | 4.97x | 4.39x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
T leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in T five years ago would be worth $12,995 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,637 for BCE. Over the past 12 months, RCI leads with a +49.3% total return vs T's -6.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors T at 18.6% vs BCE's -13.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.6% | +5.2% | +0.7% | +5.1% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +49.3% | +21.6% | -6.1% | -6.2% | +13.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.2% | -34.2% | -21.0% | +67.0% | +45.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.3% | -23.6% | -15.0% | +29.9% | +2.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +36.2% | +8.0% | +46.2% | +41.9% | +41.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.1% | -13.0% | -7.6% | +18.6% | +13.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BCE and T each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
T is the less volatile stock with a -0.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCI's 0.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BCE currently trades 92.6% from its 52-week high vs TU's 77.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.29x | -0.06x | 0.11x | -0.26x | -0.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $41.14 | $26.52 | $16.74 | $29.79 | $51.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $24.80 | $21.04 | $11.69 | $22.95 | $10.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.9% | +92.6% | +77.0% | +84.8% | +91.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.3 | 51.1 | 57.8 | 38.9 | 49.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 3.1M | 5.3M | 33.7M | 24.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BCE and VZ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RCI as "Hold", BCE as "Hold", TU as "Buy", T as "Hold", VZ as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 75.2% upside for TU (target: $23) vs 1.2% for RCI (target: $37). For income investors, BCE offers the higher dividend yield at 6.99% vs RCI's 3.87%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $37.00 | $26.00 | $22.59 | $29.42 | $51.56 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 25 | 21 | 23 | 62 | 60 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.9% | +7.0% | +6.0% | +4.5% | +5.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.93 | $2.34 | $1.06 | $1.14 | $2.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.7% | +0.1% | +2.6% | 0.0% |
RCI leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). T leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.
RCI vs BCE vs TU vs T vs VZ: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RCI or BCE or TU or T or VZ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Rogers Communications Inc.
(RCI) is the stronger pick with 5. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 2% for BCE Inc. (BCE). Rogers Communications Inc. (RCI) offers the better valuation at 3. 9x trailing P/E (10. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TELUS Corporation (TU) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RCI or BCE or TU or T or VZ?
On trailing P/E, Rogers Communications Inc.
(RCI) is the cheapest at 3. 9x versus TELUS Corporation at 24. 4x. On forward P/E, BCE Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Rogers Communications Inc. wins at 0. 33x versus BCE Inc. 's 0. 43x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RCI or BCE or TU or T or VZ?
Over the past 5 years, AT&T Inc.
(T) delivered a total return of +29. 9%, compared to -23. 6% for BCE Inc. (BCE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TU returned +46. 2% versus BCE's +8. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RCI or BCE or TU or T or VZ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AT&T Inc.
(T) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 26β versus Rogers Communications Inc. 's 0. 29β — meaning RCI is approximately -212% more volatile than T relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AT&T Inc. (T) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 135% versus 190% for TELUS Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RCI or BCE or TU or T or VZ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Rogers Communications Inc.
(RCI) is pulling ahead at 5. 3% versus 0. 2% for BCE Inc. (BCE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BCE Inc. grew EPS 36. 7% year-over-year, compared to -2. 2% for Verizon Communications Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RCI leads at 12. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RCI or BCE or TU or T or VZ?
Rogers Communications Inc.
(RCI) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 8% net margin versus 5. 4% for TELUS Corporation — meaning it keeps 31. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RCI leads at 23. 1% versus 11. 5% for TU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — T leads at 79. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RCI or BCE or TU or T or VZ more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Rogers Communications Inc. (RCI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 33x versus BCE Inc. 's 0. 43x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, BCE Inc. (BCE) trades at 9. 5x forward P/E versus 19. 6x for TELUS Corporation — 10. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TU: 75. 2% to $22. 59.
08Which pays a better dividend — RCI or BCE or TU or T or VZ?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
BCE Inc. (BCE) offers the highest yield at 7. 0%, versus 3. 9% for Rogers Communications Inc. (RCI).
09Is RCI or BCE or TU or T or VZ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AT&T Inc.
(T) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 26), 4. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (T: +41. 9%, RCI: +36. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RCI and BCE and TU and T and VZ?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RCI is a mid-cap deep-value stock; BCE is a mid-cap deep-value stock; TU is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; T is a mid-cap deep-value stock; VZ is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 20%
- Dividend Yield > 1.5%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 15%
- Dividend Yield > 2.7%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 10%
- Dividend Yield > 1.8%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.