Entertainment
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
RDI vs AMC vs CNK vs IMAX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Entertainment
Entertainment
RDI vs AMC vs CNK vs IMAX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Entertainment | Entertainment | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $24M | $930M | $3.21B | $1.92B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $211M | $5.03B | $3.12B | $405M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-17M | $-547M | $138M | $43M |
| Gross Margin | 11.3% | 75.3% | 40.7% | 58.1% |
| Operating Margin | -3.0% | 46.5% | 11.0% | 21.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 13.0x | 21.1x |
| Total Debt | $390M | $8.14B | $3.78B | $297M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $12M | $429M | $344M | $151M |
RDI vs AMC vs CNK vs IMAX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reading Internation… (RDI) | 100 | 30.9 | -69.1% |
| AMC Entertainment H… (AMC) | 100 | 3.0 | -97.0% |
| Cinemark Holdings, … (CNK) | 100 | 182.8 | +82.8% |
| IMAX Corporation (IMAX) | 100 | 282.6 | +182.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RDI vs AMC vs CNK vs IMAX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RDI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.59
AMC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CNK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 0.22, yield 1.1%, current ratio 0.71x
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 0.22 vs AMC's 1.82
- 1.1% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
IMAX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 16.5%, EPS growth 31.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.9%
- 8.9% 10Y total return vs CNK's -6.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.43, Low D/E 69.5%, current ratio 1.67x
- 16.5% revenue growth vs RDI's -5.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.5% revenue growth vs RDI's -5.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.7% margin vs AMC's -10.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.22 vs AMC's 1.82 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +38.9% vs AMC's -43.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.9% ROA vs AMC's -6.9%, ROIC 12.7% vs 23.7% |
RDI vs AMC vs CNK vs IMAX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RDI vs AMC vs CNK vs IMAX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IMAX leads in 2 of 6 categories
RDI leads 0 • AMC leads 0 • CNK leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — AMC and IMAX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMC is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.0B annually — 23.8x RDI's $211M. IMAX is the more profitable business, keeping 10.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMC's -10.9%. On growth, AMC holds the edge at +21.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $211M | $5.0B | $3.1B | $405M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $24M | $2.6B | $545M | $150M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$17M | -$547M | $138M | $43M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1M | -$124M | $177M | $115M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.3% | +75.3% | +40.7% | +58.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.0% | +46.5% | +11.0% | +21.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.2% | -10.9% | +4.4% | +10.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.5% | -2.5% | +5.7% | +28.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.2% | +21.2% | -4.7% | -6.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +40.0% | +53.2% | -18.2% | +65.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AMC and IMAX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.4x trailing earnings, CNK trades at a 53% valuation discount to IMAX's 56.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMC's 4.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RDI's 128.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $24M | $930M | $3.2B | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $402M | $8.6B | $6.6B | $2.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.68x | -1.24x | 26.42x | 56.56x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 12.97x | 21.15x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 128.54x | 4.67x | 12.23x | 13.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.11x | 0.19x | 1.03x | 4.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — | 8.92x | 4.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 18.11x | 16.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IMAX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CNK delivers a 25.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $-3 for RDI. IMAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.70x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNK's 9.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IMAX scores 7/9 vs AMC's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.5% | — | +25.4% | +10.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.0% | -6.9% | +3.0% | +4.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.6% | +23.7% | +7.5% | +12.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.9% | +29.0% | +9.3% | +14.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 9.14x | 0.70x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $378M | $7.7B | $3.4B | $146M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $12M | $429M | $344M | $151M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $390M | $8.1B | $3.8B | $297M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.10x | 0.35x | 1.89x | 21.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IMAX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IMAX five years ago would be worth $17,034 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $160 for AMC. Over the past 12 months, IMAX leads with a +38.9% total return vs AMC's -43.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IMAX at 21.5% vs AMC's -70.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.9% | -5.6% | +17.2% | -1.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -20.6% | -43.9% | -10.7% | +38.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.1% | -97.4% | +71.0% | +79.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.1% | -98.4% | +29.3% | +70.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.1% | -84.7% | -6.6% | +8.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -30.3% | -70.5% | +19.6% | +21.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CNK and IMAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CNK is the less volatile stock with a 0.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMC's 1.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMAX currently trades 82.6% from its 52-week high vs AMC's 37.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.59x | 1.82x | 0.22x | 0.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.65 | $4.08 | $34.01 | $43.16 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.94 | $0.93 | $21.60 | $24.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.5% | +37.3% | +80.8% | +82.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.5 | 60.0 | 43.7 | 42.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 24K | 30.1M | 2.1M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — RDI and IMAX each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMC as "Hold", CNK as "Buy", IMAX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.6% upside for AMC (target: $2) vs 15.2% for CNK (target: $32). CNK is the only dividend payer here at 1.05% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $2.00 | $31.67 | $43.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 28 | 31 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.29 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +8.6% | +0.1% |
IMAX leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency and Total Returns. 4 categories are tied.
RDI vs AMC vs CNK vs IMAX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RDI or AMC or CNK or IMAX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, IMAX Corporation (IMAX) is the stronger pick with 16.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 5% for Reading International, Inc. (RDI). Cinemark Holdings, Inc. (CNK) offers the better valuation at 26. 4x trailing P/E (13. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cinemark Holdings, Inc. (CNK) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RDI or AMC or CNK or IMAX?
On trailing P/E, Cinemark Holdings, Inc.
(CNK) is the cheapest at 26. 4x versus IMAX Corporation at 56. 6x. On forward P/E, Cinemark Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RDI or AMC or CNK or IMAX?
Over the past 5 years, IMAX Corporation (IMAX) delivered a total return of +70.
3%, compared to -98. 4% for AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. (AMC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMAX returned +8. 9% versus RDI's -92. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RDI or AMC or CNK or IMAX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cinemark Holdings, Inc.
(CNK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 22β versus AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 82β — meaning AMC is approximately 735% more volatile than CNK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, IMAX Corporation (IMAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 70% versus 9% for Cinemark Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RDI or AMC or CNK or IMAX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), IMAX Corporation (IMAX) is pulling ahead at 16.
5% versus -5. 5% for Reading International, Inc. (RDI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: IMAX Corporation grew EPS 31. 3% year-over-year, compared to -49. 5% for Cinemark Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RDI leads at 14. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RDI or AMC or CNK or IMAX?
IMAX Corporation (IMAX) is the more profitable company, earning 8.
5% net margin versus -16. 8% for Reading International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMC leads at 38. 1% versus -6. 7% for RDI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMC leads at 75. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RDI or AMC or CNK or IMAX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Cinemark Holdings, Inc.
(CNK) trades at 13. 0x forward P/E versus 21. 1x for IMAX Corporation — 8. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMC: 31. 6% to $2. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — RDI or AMC or CNK or IMAX?
In this comparison, CNK (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. RDI, AMC, IMAX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RDI or AMC or CNK or IMAX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cinemark Holdings, Inc.
(CNK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 22), 1. 1% yield). AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. (AMC) carries a higher beta of 1. 82 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CNK: -6. 6%, AMC: -84. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RDI and AMC and CNK and IMAX?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RDI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CNK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMAX is a small-cap high-growth stock. CNK pays a dividend while RDI, AMC, IMAX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 10%
- Gross Margin > 45%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 24%
- Dividend Yield > 0.5%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.