Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
RDNT vs AORT vs NVCR vs NNOX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Devices
RDNT vs AORT vs NVCR vs NNOX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $4.45B | $1.72B | $1.92B | $115M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.04B | $459M | $674M | $12M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $47M | $12M | $-173M | $-56M |
| Gross Margin | 11.2% | 63.8% | 75.2% | -98.8% |
| Operating Margin | 3.0% | 7.4% | -27.2% | -469.7% |
| Forward P/E | 91.8x | 98.7x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $1.86B | $292M | $290M | $7M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $767M | $65M | $103M | $39M |
RDNT vs AORT vs NVCR vs NNOX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| RadNet, Inc. (RDNT) | 100 | 293.8 | +193.8% |
| Artivion, Inc. (AORT) | 100 | 149.9 | +49.9% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 9.7 | -90.3% |
| Nano-X Imaging Ltd. (NNOX) | 100 | 3.9 | -96.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RDNT vs AORT vs NVCR vs NNOX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RDNT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 9.5% 10Y total return vs AORT's 188.9%
- Better valuation composite
AORT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.63
- Lower volatility, beta 0.63, Low D/E 65.2%, current ratio 2.99x
- Beta 0.63, current ratio 2.99x
- 2.5% margin vs NNOX's -452.8%
NVCR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NNOX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 13.9%, EPS growth 15.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 105.3%
- 13.9% revenue growth vs NVCR's 8.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.9% revenue growth vs NVCR's 8.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.5% margin vs NNOX's -452.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.63 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +24.7% vs NNOX's -64.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.3% ROA vs NNOX's -31.6%, ROIC 3.2% vs -27.9% |
RDNT vs AORT vs NVCR vs NNOX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
RDNT vs AORT vs NVCR vs NNOX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AORT leads in 4 of 6 categories
RDNT leads 1 • NVCR leads 0 • NNOX leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AORT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RDNT is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.0B annually — 165.8x NNOX's $12M. AORT is the more profitable business, keeping 2.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NNOX's -4.5%. On growth, AORT holds the edge at +17.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.0B | $459M | $674M | $12M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $214M | $51M | -$165M | -$46M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $47M | $12M | -$173M | -$56M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$178M | $13M | -$48M | -$47M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.2% | +63.8% | +75.2% | -98.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.0% | +7.4% | -27.2% | -4.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.3% | +2.5% | -25.7% | -4.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.7% | +2.8% | -7.1% | -3.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.8% | +17.5% | +12.3% | +13.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -114.1% | +3.5% | -100.0% | +8.7% |
Valuation Metrics
RDNT leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, RDNT's 25.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AORT's 39.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.5B | $1.7B | $1.9B | $115M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.5B | $1.9B | $2.1B | $83M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -230.00x | 168.52x | -13.80x | -1.93x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 91.75x | 98.69x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 25.88x | 39.50x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.18x | 3.89x | 2.92x | 10.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.19x | 3.72x | 5.51x | 0.55x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 52.01x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
AORT leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RDNT delivers a 3.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-51 for NVCR. NNOX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RDNT's 1.37x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AORT scores 6/9 vs NNOX's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.8% | +2.7% | -50.8% | -35.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.3% | +1.3% | -16.5% | -31.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.0% | +3.2% | -16.4% | -27.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.1% | +3.6% | -28.9% | -28.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.37x | 0.65x | 0.85x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.1B | $227M | $187M | -$32M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $767M | $65M | $103M | $39M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.9B | $292M | $290M | $7M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.46x | 1.28x | -96.80x | -379.29x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AORT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RDNT five years ago would be worth $24,710 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $605 for NNOX. Over the past 12 months, AORT leads with a +24.7% total return vs NNOX's -64.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AORT at 34.3% vs NNOX's -52.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.0% | -20.4% | +28.3% | -37.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.6% | +24.7% | +1.1% | -64.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +100.0% | +142.2% | -75.7% | -89.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +147.1% | +15.4% | -91.3% | -93.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +947.4% | +188.9% | +30.3% | -96.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.0% | +34.3% | -37.6% | -52.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AORT and NVCR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AORT is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVCR currently trades 83.9% from its 52-week high vs NNOX's 30.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.43x | 0.63x | 2.20x | 1.86x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $85.84 | $48.25 | $20.06 | $5.86 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $50.76 | $26.84 | $9.82 | $1.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.0% | +73.3% | +83.9% | +30.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.3 | 42.1 | 69.8 | 38.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 822K | 385K | 1.5M | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
AORT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RDNT as "Buy", AORT as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", NNOX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 922.7% upside for NNOX (target: $18) vs 46.9% for AORT (target: $52).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $92.00 | $52.00 | $33.50 | $18.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 12 | 15 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
AORT leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RDNT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
RDNT vs AORT vs NVCR vs NNOX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RDNT or AORT or NVCR or NNOX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Nano-X Imaging Ltd.
(NNOX) is the stronger pick with 13. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Artivion, Inc. (AORT) offers the better valuation at 168. 5x trailing P/E (98. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate RadNet, Inc. (RDNT) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RDNT or AORT or NVCR or NNOX?
On forward P/E, RadNet, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 91. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RDNT or AORT or NVCR or NNOX?
Over the past 5 years, RadNet, Inc.
(RDNT) delivered a total return of +147. 1%, compared to -93. 9% for Nano-X Imaging Ltd. (NNOX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RDNT returned +947. 4% versus NNOX's -96. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RDNT or AORT or NVCR or NNOX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Artivion, Inc.
(AORT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 63β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 20β — meaning NVCR is approximately 250% more volatile than AORT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nano-X Imaging Ltd. (NNOX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 137% for RadNet, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RDNT or AORT or NVCR or NNOX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nano-X Imaging Ltd.
(NNOX) is pulling ahead at 13. 9% versus 8. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Artivion, Inc. grew EPS 165. 6% year-over-year, compared to -768. 4% for RadNet, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NNOX leads at 105. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RDNT or AORT or NVCR or NNOX?
RadNet, Inc.
(RDNT) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 3% net margin versus -474. 3% for Nano-X Imaging Ltd. — meaning it keeps 2. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AORT leads at 6. 1% versus -502. 9% for NNOX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVCR leads at 74. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RDNT or AORT or NVCR or NNOX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, RadNet, Inc.
(RDNT) trades at 91. 8x forward P/E versus 98. 7x for Artivion, Inc. — 6. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NNOX: 922. 7% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — RDNT or AORT or NVCR or NNOX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is RDNT or AORT or NVCR or NNOX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Artivion, Inc.
(AORT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 63), +188. 9% 10Y return). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AORT: +188. 9%, NVCR: +30. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RDNT and AORT and NVCR and NNOX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.