RDNT vs DBVT

Analysts rate RadNet, Inc.

(RDNT) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, RadNet, Inc.

(RDNT) delivered a total return of +147. 1%, compared to -69. 1% for DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RDNT returned +947. 4% versus DBVT's -87. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), DBV Technologies S.

A. (DBVT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 26β versus RadNet, Inc. 's 1. 43β — meaning RDNT is approximately 13% more volatile than DBVT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 137% for RadNet, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DBV Technologies S.

A. grew EPS -347. 5% year-over-year, compared to -768. 4% for RadNet, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

RadNet, Inc.

(RDNT) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 3% net margin versus 0. 0% for DBV Technologies S. A. — meaning it keeps 2. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RDNT leads at 3. 0% versus 0. 0% for DBVT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RDNT leads at 11. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DBVT: 131.

8% to $46. 33.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, RadNet, Inc.

(RDNT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+947. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RDNT: +947. 4%, DBVT: -87. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.