Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RDY vs SUN vs PRGO vs AMRX vs TEVA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
RDY vs SUN vs PRGO vs AMRX vs TEVA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic |
| Market Cap | $11.19B | $9.26B | $1.61B | $4.31B | $41.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $345.83B | $30.71B | $4.18B | $3.02B | $17.35B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $56.59B | $835M | $-1.82B | $72M | $1.56B |
| Gross Margin | 55.2% | 10.3% | 34.2% | 36.9% | 52.1% |
| Operating Margin | 19.3% | 4.9% | -4.1% | -0.2% | 13.2% |
| Forward P/E | 0.2x | 9.4x | 5.6x | 13.8x | 14.5x |
| Total Debt | $46.77B | $16.11B | $3.97B | $124M | $17.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14.65B | $891M | $532M | $282M | $3.56B |
RDY vs SUN vs PRGO vs AMRX vs TEVA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Reddy's Laborat… (RDY) | 100 | 125.8 | +25.8% |
| Sunoco LP (SUN) | 100 | 262.8 | +162.8% |
| Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) | 100 | 21.4 | -78.6% |
| Amneal Pharmaceutic… (AMRX) | 100 | 281.7 | +181.7% |
| Teva Pharmaceutical… (TEVA) | 100 | 287.4 | +187.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RDY vs SUN vs PRGO vs AMRX vs TEVA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RDY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 16.6%, EPS growth 1.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 13.9%, current ratio 1.92x
- 16.6% revenue growth vs PRGO's -2.8%
- Lower P/E (0.2x vs 14.5x)
SUN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.13, yield 7.1%
- 209.2% 10Y total return vs TEVA's -28.3%
- Beta 0.13, yield 7.1%, current ratio 1.38x
- Beta 0.13 vs PRGO's 1.18
PRGO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 9.8% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs RDY's 0.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, AMRX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TEVA is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +104.6% vs PRGO's -51.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.6% revenue growth vs PRGO's -2.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.2x vs 14.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.4% margin vs PRGO's -43.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.13 vs PRGO's 1.18 | |
| Dividends | 9.8% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs RDY's 0.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +104.6% vs PRGO's -51.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.1% ROA vs PRGO's -19.8%, ROIC 16.3% vs 3.7% |
RDY vs SUN vs PRGO vs AMRX vs TEVA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RDY vs SUN vs PRGO vs AMRX vs TEVA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PRGO leads in 2 of 6 categories
RDY leads 1 • SUN leads 1 • AMRX leads 0 • TEVA leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RDY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RDY is the larger business by revenue, generating $345.8B annually — 114.6x AMRX's $3.0B. RDY is the more profitable business, keeping 16.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRGO's -43.5%. On growth, SUN holds the edge at +106.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $345.8B | $30.7B | $4.2B | $3.0B | $17.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $86.3B | $2.3B | $58M | $169M | $3.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $56.6B | $835M | -$1.8B | $72M | $1.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $24.3B | $828M | $108M | $150M | $1.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.2% | +10.3% | +34.2% | +36.9% | +52.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.3% | +4.9% | -4.1% | -0.2% | +13.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.4% | +2.7% | -43.5% | +2.4% | +9.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.0% | +2.7% | +2.6% | +5.0% | +6.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.4% | +106.4% | -7.2% | +11.5% | +2.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -14.3% | +179.3% | -56.4% | +2.1% | +72.2% |
Valuation Metrics
PRGO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.5x trailing earnings, SUN trades at a 70% valuation discount to AMRX's 62.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRGO's 7.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TEVA's 17.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11.2B | $9.3B | $1.6B | $4.3B | $41.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11.5B | $24.5B | $5.1B | $4.2B | $55.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.82x | 18.52x | -1.14x | 62.36x | 30.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.22x | 9.39x | 5.56x | 13.81x | 14.55x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.04x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.31x | 15.14x | 7.42x | — | 17.65x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.26x | 0.37x | 0.38x | 1.43x | 2.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.16x | 1.16x | 0.55x | 4.62x | 5.34x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 88.28x | 15.06x | 11.12x | 15.98x | 36.52x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — RDY and AMRX each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TEVA delivers a 20.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-51 for PRGO. AMRX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TEVA's 2.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMRX scores 8/9 vs RDY's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.1% | +12.9% | -50.7% | +7.5% | +20.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.1% | +3.7% | -19.8% | +2.0% | +3.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.3% | +4.0% | +3.7% | -0.2% | +7.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +22.0% | +5.0% | +4.3% | -0.2% | +8.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.14x | 2.01x | 1.35x | 0.13x | 2.20x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $32.1B | $15.2B | $3.4B | -$158M | $13.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14.7B | $891M | $532M | $282M | $3.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $46.8B | $16.1B | $4.0B | $124M | $17.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 22.23x | 2.69x | -7.20x | 2.09x | 2.51x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — SUN and AMRX and TEVA each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TEVA five years ago would be worth $34,625 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,986 for PRGO. Over the past 12 months, TEVA leads with a +104.6% total return vs PRGO's -51.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMRX at 89.4% vs PRGO's -25.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.0% | +30.3% | -13.5% | +8.4% | +16.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.1% | +26.4% | -51.2% | +90.0% | +104.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.6% | +77.6% | -58.1% | +579.2% | +297.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -2.3% | +135.4% | -60.1% | +163.8% | +246.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.4% | +209.2% | -77.7% | -54.9% | -28.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.3% | +21.1% | -25.2% | +89.4% | +58.4% |
Risk & Volatility
SUN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SUN is the less volatile stock with a 0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRGO's 1.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SUN currently trades 96.9% from its 52-week high vs PRGO's 41.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.46x | 0.13x | 1.18x | 1.17x | 1.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.17 | $70.00 | $28.44 | $15.20 | $37.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.77 | $47.98 | $9.23 | $7.02 | $14.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.1% | +96.9% | +41.2% | +90.3% | +96.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.2 | 52.5 | 60.9 | 62.7 | 73.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.3M | 471K | 3.4M | 1.7M | 6.6M |
Analyst Outlook
PRGO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RDY as "Buy", SUN as "Hold", PRGO as "Hold", AMRX as "Buy", TEVA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 70.6% upside for PRGO (target: $20) vs 0.3% for SUN (target: $68). For income investors, PRGO offers the higher dividend yield at 9.81% vs RDY's 0.63%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $68.00 | $20.00 | $17.00 | $39.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 24 | 36 | 16 | 46 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.6% | +7.1% | +9.8% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 4 | 10 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $7.99 | $4.79 | $1.15 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
PRGO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). RDY leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
RDY vs SUN vs PRGO vs AMRX vs TEVA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RDY or SUN or PRGO or AMRX or TEVA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Dr.
Reddy's Laboratories Limited (RDY) is the stronger pick with 16. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 8% for Perrigo Company plc (PRGO). Sunoco LP (SUN) offers the better valuation at 18. 5x trailing P/E (9. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Limited (RDY) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RDY or SUN or PRGO or AMRX or TEVA?
On trailing P/E, Sunoco LP (SUN) is the cheapest at 18.
5x versus Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 62. 4x. On forward P/E, Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Limited is actually cheaper at 0. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RDY or SUN or PRGO or AMRX or TEVA?
Over the past 5 years, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited (TEVA) delivered a total return of +246.
2%, compared to -60. 1% for Perrigo Company plc (PRGO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SUN returned +209. 2% versus PRGO's -77. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RDY or SUN or PRGO or AMRX or TEVA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sunoco LP (SUN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
13β versus Perrigo Company plc's 1. 18β — meaning PRGO is approximately 834% more volatile than SUN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMRX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 2% for Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RDY or SUN or PRGO or AMRX or TEVA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Dr.
Reddy's Laboratories Limited (RDY) is pulling ahead at 16. 6% versus -2. 8% for Perrigo Company plc (PRGO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited grew EPS 182. 8% year-over-year, compared to -723. 2% for Perrigo Company plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, RDY leads at 14. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RDY or SUN or PRGO or AMRX or TEVA?
Dr.
Reddy's Laboratories Limited (RDY) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 4% net margin versus -33. 5% for Perrigo Company plc — meaning it keeps 17. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RDY leads at 22. 1% versus -0. 2% for AMRX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RDY leads at 58. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RDY or SUN or PRGO or AMRX or TEVA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Dr.
Reddy's Laboratories Limited (RDY) trades at 0. 2x forward P/E versus 14. 5x for Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited — 14. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRGO: 70. 6% to $20. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — RDY or SUN or PRGO or AMRX or TEVA?
In this comparison, PRGO (9.
8% yield), SUN (7. 1% yield), RDY (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. AMRX, TEVA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RDY or SUN or PRGO or AMRX or TEVA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sunoco LP (SUN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
13), 7. 1% yield, +209. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SUN: +209. 2%, AMRX: -54. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RDY and SUN and PRGO and AMRX and TEVA?
These companies operate in different sectors (RDY (Healthcare) and SUN (Energy) and PRGO (Healthcare) and AMRX (Healthcare) and TEVA (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RDY is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SUN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PRGO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; AMRX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TEVA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. RDY, SUN, PRGO pay a dividend while AMRX, TEVA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.