Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
REFR vs VUZI vs MVIS vs KOSS vs HAYW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Consumer Electronics
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Consumer Electronics
Electrical Equipment & Parts
REFR vs VUZI vs MVIS vs KOSS vs HAYW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Consumer Electronics | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Consumer Electronics | Electrical Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $29M | $232M | $189M | $40M | $3.20B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $5M | $1M | $13M | $1.15B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $-32.28B | $-95M | $-871K | $161M |
| Gross Margin | 95.8% | -0.0% | -14.4% | 36.4% | 45.0% |
| Operating Margin | -190.2% | -5.2% | -57.4% | -15.8% | 21.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | — | 17.2x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $1.00B | $37M | $3M | $13M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $664K | $21.15B | $32M | $3M | $330M |
REFR vs VUZI vs MVIS vs KOSS vs HAYW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research Frontiers … (REFR) | 100 | 29.3 | -70.7% |
| Vuzix Corporation (VUZI) | 100 | 11.2 | -88.8% |
| MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS) | 100 | 3.3 | -96.7% |
| Koss Corporation (KOSS) | 100 | 18.6 | -81.4% |
| Hayward Holdings, I… (HAYW) | 100 | 87.5 | -12.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: REFR vs VUZI vs MVIS vs KOSS vs HAYW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
REFR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.
- Beta 0.86, current ratio 3.84x
- Beta 0.86 vs VUZI's 3.40
VUZI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 3.40, yield 10.1%
- Rev growth 1.1K%, EPS growth 61.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.1%
- 1.1K% revenue growth vs MVIS's -74.3%
- 10.1% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
MVIS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, KOSS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
HAYW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- -13.1% 10Y total return vs KOSS's 91.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.14, Low D/E 0.8%, current ratio 2.94x
- 14.0% margin vs MVIS's -78.6%
- 5.2% ROA vs VUZI's -321.3%, ROIC 10.2% vs -10.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.1K% revenue growth vs MVIS's -74.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.0% margin vs MVIS's -78.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.86 vs VUZI's 3.40 | |
| Dividends | 10.1% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +63.4% vs MVIS's -45.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.2% ROA vs VUZI's -321.3%, ROIC 10.2% vs -10.7% |
REFR vs VUZI vs MVIS vs KOSS vs HAYW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
REFR vs VUZI vs MVIS vs KOSS vs HAYW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HAYW leads in 3 of 6 categories
VUZI leads 2 • REFR leads 0 • MVIS leads 0 • KOSS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HAYW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HAYW is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.1B annually — 1024.3x REFR's $1M. HAYW is the more profitable business, keeping 14.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MVIS's -78.6%. On growth, VUZI holds the edge at +4933.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $5M | $1M | $13M | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | -$30.9B | -$64M | -$2M | $301M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | -$32.3B | -$95M | -$871,116 | $161M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1M | -$20.8B | -$59M | -$546,651 | $80M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +95.8% | -0.0% | -14.4% | +36.4% | +45.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -190.2% | -5.2% | -57.4% | -15.8% | +21.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -182.4% | -5.1% | -78.6% | -6.8% | +14.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -118.6% | -3.3% | -49.2% | -4.3% | +7.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -59.5% | +4933.1% | -86.5% | -19.6% | +11.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -26.0% | +25.0% | +14.3% | — | +70.3% |
Valuation Metrics
VUZI leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $29M | $232M | $189M | $40M | $3.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $29M | -$19.9B | $193M | $39M | $2.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -13.70x | -6.81x | -1.76x | -44.78x | 21.71x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 17.19x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.16x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 9.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 25.82x | 0.04x | 156.30x | 3.14x | 2.85x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 30.03x | 0.01x | 3.03x | 1.28x | 2.06x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 14.19x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HAYW leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HAYW delivers a 10.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-5 for VUZI. HAYW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to REFR's 1.25x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HAYW scores 7/9 vs VUZI's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -122.9% | -5.2% | -137.4% | -2.8% | +10.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -68.4% | -3.2% | -74.3% | -2.3% | +5.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -95.7% | -10.7% | -98.3% | -4.2% | +10.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -74.5% | -184.6% | -93.6% | -4.9% | +8.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.25x | 0.04x | 0.66x | 0.08x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $501,986 | -$20.1B | $4M | -$266,063 | -$316M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $664,299 | $21.2B | $32M | $3M | $330M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $1.0B | $37M | $3M | $13M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | -3.54x | -1972.72x | 4.07x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HAYW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HAYW five years ago would be worth $6,302 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $437 for MVIS. Over the past 12 months, VUZI leads with a +63.4% total return vs MVIS's -45.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HAYW at 8.4% vs MVIS's -35.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -34.9% | -25.7% | -30.8% | -3.6% | -6.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -28.2% | +63.4% | -45.5% | -10.6% | +7.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.3% | -29.6% | -73.6% | +5.3% | +27.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.9% | -84.8% | -95.6% | -75.7% | -37.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.2% | -35.7% | -66.2% | +91.0% | -13.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -17.2% | -11.0% | -35.8% | +1.7% | +8.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — REFR and HAYW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
REFR is the less volatile stock with a 0.86 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VUZI's 3.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HAYW currently trades 83.3% from its 52-week high vs REFR's 30.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.86x | 3.40x | 2.61x | 1.62x | 1.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.70 | $4.29 | $1.73 | $8.59 | $17.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.82 | $1.71 | $0.51 | $3.50 | $13.04 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +30.9% | +66.7% | +35.6% | +48.7% | +83.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.4 | 61.1 | 50.3 | 55.2 | 51.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 33K | 924K | 5.3M | 23K | 2.2M |
Analyst Outlook
VUZI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VUZI as "Buy", MVIS as "Buy", HAYW as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 711.7% upside for MVIS (target: $5) vs 6.7% for HAYW (target: $16). VUZI is the only dividend payer here at 10.10% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $6.00 | $5.00 | — | $15.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 | 7 | — | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +10.1% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.29 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
HAYW leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). VUZI leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
REFR vs VUZI vs MVIS vs KOSS vs HAYW: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is REFR or VUZI or MVIS or KOSS or HAYW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Vuzix Corporation (VUZI) is the stronger pick with 1090% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -74.
3% for MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS). Hayward Holdings, Inc. (HAYW) offers the better valuation at 21. 7x trailing P/E (17. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vuzix Corporation (VUZI) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — REFR or VUZI or MVIS or KOSS or HAYW?
Over the past 5 years, Hayward Holdings, Inc.
(HAYW) delivered a total return of -37. 0%, compared to -95. 6% for MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KOSS returned +91. 0% versus REFR's -80. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — REFR or VUZI or MVIS or KOSS or HAYW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Research Frontiers Incorporated (REFR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
86β versus Vuzix Corporation's 3. 40β — meaning VUZI is approximately 296% more volatile than REFR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hayward Holdings, Inc. (HAYW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 125% for Research Frontiers Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — REFR or VUZI or MVIS or KOSS or HAYW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Vuzix Corporation (VUZI) is pulling ahead at 1090% versus -74.
3% for MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vuzix Corporation grew EPS 61. 1% year-over-year, compared to -55. 5% for Research Frontiers Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, VUZI leads at 709. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — REFR or VUZI or MVIS or KOSS or HAYW?
Hayward Holdings, Inc.
(HAYW) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 5% net margin versus -78. 6% for MicroVision, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HAYW leads at 21. 1% versus -57. 4% for MVIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — REFR leads at 83. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is REFR or VUZI or MVIS or KOSS or HAYW more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MVIS: 711.
7% to $5. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — REFR or VUZI or MVIS or KOSS or HAYW?
In this comparison, VUZI (10.
1% yield) pays a dividend. REFR, MVIS, KOSS, HAYW do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is REFR or VUZI or MVIS or KOSS or HAYW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Research Frontiers Incorporated (REFR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
86)). MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS) carries a higher beta of 2. 61 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (REFR: -80. 2%, MVIS: -66. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between REFR and VUZI and MVIS and KOSS and HAYW?
These companies operate in different sectors (REFR (Technology) and VUZI (Technology) and MVIS (Technology) and KOSS (Technology) and HAYW (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: REFR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VUZI is a small-cap high-growth stock; MVIS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KOSS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HAYW is a small-cap quality compounder stock. VUZI pays a dividend while REFR, MVIS, KOSS, HAYW do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.