Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
REKR vs AIOT vs SAIC vs CEVA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
Information Technology Services
Semiconductors
REKR vs AIOT vs SAIC vs CEVA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Communication Equipment | Information Technology Services | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $109M | $463M | $4.24B | $810M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $49M | $436M | $7.26B | $108M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-44M | $-32M | $358M | $-11M |
| Gross Margin | 53.9% | 55.2% | 12.0% | 87.2% |
| Operating Margin | -82.2% | 1.7% | 7.1% | -10.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 9.3x | 67.3x |
| Total Debt | $32M | $287M | $217M | $6M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $49M | $182M | $18M |
REKR vs AIOT vs SAIC vs CEVA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rekor Systems, Inc. (REKR) | 100 | 55.4 | -44.6% |
| PowerFleet, Inc. (AIOT) | 100 | 74.4 | -25.6% |
| Science Application… (SAIC) | 100 | 80.1 | -19.9% |
| CEVA, Inc. (CEVA) | 100 | 174.8 | +74.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: REKR vs AIOT vs SAIC vs CEVA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
REKR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
AIOT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 66.3%, EPS growth 60.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 42.2%
- 66.3% revenue growth vs SAIC's -2.9%
- 22.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SAIC's 1.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
SAIC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.26, yield 1.6%
- 104.4% 10Y total return vs CEVA's 27.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.26, Low D/E 14.5%, current ratio 1.20x
- Beta 0.26, yield 1.6%, current ratio 1.20x
CEVA is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +59.5% vs AIOT's -32.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 66.3% revenue growth vs SAIC's -2.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.3x vs 67.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.9% margin vs REKR's -89.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.26 vs CEVA's 2.76 | |
| Dividends | 22.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SAIC's 1.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +59.5% vs AIOT's -32.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.8% ROA vs REKR's -54.4%, ROIC 14.2% vs -66.9% |
REKR vs AIOT vs SAIC vs CEVA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
REKR vs AIOT vs SAIC vs CEVA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SAIC leads in 3 of 6 categories
CEVA leads 1 • REKR leads 0 • AIOT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SAIC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SAIC is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.3B annually — 148.1x REKR's $49M. SAIC is the more profitable business, keeping 4.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to REKR's -89.8%. On growth, AIOT holds the edge at +47.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $49M | $436M | $7.3B | $108M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$33M | $69M | $666M | -$7M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$44M | -$32M | $358M | -$11M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$28M | $3M | $609M | -$6M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.9% | +55.2% | +12.0% | +87.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -82.2% | +1.7% | +7.1% | -10.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -89.8% | -7.4% | +4.9% | -10.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -57.9% | +0.6% | +8.4% | -6.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +34.6% | +47.4% | -4.8% | +4.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +78.6% | -25.5% | -6.5% | -2.0% |
Valuation Metrics
SAIC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, SAIC's 6.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AIOT's 44.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $109M | $463M | $4.2B | $810M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $136M | $701M | $4.3B | $797M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.21x | -7.91x | 12.22x | -91.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 9.33x | 67.35x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.73x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 44.16x | 6.43x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.36x | 1.28x | 0.58x | 7.57x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.18x | 0.91x | 2.92x | 2.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 7.34x | 1569.47x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SAIC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SAIC delivers a 23.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-121 for REKR. CEVA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to REKR's 0.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SAIC scores 7/9 vs AIOT's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -120.7% | -6.6% | +23.7% | -4.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -54.4% | -3.4% | +6.8% | -3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -66.9% | -4.3% | +14.2% | -2.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -78.1% | -5.1% | +12.5% | -2.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.95x | 0.64x | 0.14x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $27M | $238M | $35M | -$13M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $49M | $182M | $18M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $32M | $287M | $217M | $6M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -17.87x | 0.47x | 3.99x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CEVA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SAIC five years ago would be worth $11,243 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $454 for REKR. Over the past 12 months, CEVA leads with a +59.5% total return vs AIOT's -32.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CEVA at 9.6% vs REKR's -13.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -39.5% | -35.2% | -6.3% | +50.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -4.8% | -32.7% | -20.9% | +59.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.4% | -28.7% | -0.8% | +31.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.5% | -28.7% | +12.4% | -35.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.4% | -28.7% | +104.4% | +27.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.1% | -10.7% | -0.3% | +9.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SAIC and CEVA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SAIC is the less volatile stock with a 0.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CEVA's 2.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CEVA currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs REKR's 25.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.55x | 2.70x | 0.26x | 2.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.42 | $6.07 | $124.11 | $34.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.72 | $2.77 | $81.08 | $17.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +25.1% | +56.0% | +75.8% | +96.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.7 | 52.2 | 46.3 | 78.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.1M | 1.6M | 563K | 498K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AIOT and SAIC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: REKR as "Buy", AIOT as "Buy", SAIC as "Hold", CEVA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 249.2% upside for REKR (target: $3) vs -13.0% for CEVA (target: $29). For income investors, AIOT offers the higher dividend yield at 22.15% vs SAIC's 1.60%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.00 | $8.00 | $97.50 | $29.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 5 | 18 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +22.2% | +1.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.75 | $1.51 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +0.6% | +10.5% | +1.0% |
SAIC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CEVA leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
REKR vs AIOT vs SAIC vs CEVA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is REKR or AIOT or SAIC or CEVA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Rekor Systems, Inc.
(REKR) is the stronger pick with 31. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 9% for Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC). Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) offers the better valuation at 12. 2x trailing P/E (9. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Rekor Systems, Inc. (REKR) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — REKR or AIOT or SAIC or CEVA?
On forward P/E, Science Applications International Corporation is actually cheaper at 9.
3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — REKR or AIOT or SAIC or CEVA?
Over the past 5 years, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) delivered a total return of +12.
4%, compared to -95. 5% for Rekor Systems, Inc. (REKR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SAIC returned +104. 4% versus REKR's -71. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — REKR or AIOT or SAIC or CEVA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
26β versus CEVA, Inc. 's 2. 76β — meaning CEVA is approximately 944% more volatile than SAIC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CEVA, Inc. (CEVA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 95% for Rekor Systems, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — REKR or AIOT or SAIC or CEVA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Rekor Systems, Inc.
(REKR) is pulling ahead at 31. 8% versus -2. 9% for Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PowerFleet, Inc. grew EPS 60. 6% year-over-year, compared to 1. 4% for Rekor Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, REKR leads at 58. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — REKR or AIOT or SAIC or CEVA?
Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) is the more profitable company, earning 4.
9% net margin versus -133. 4% for Rekor Systems, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SAIC leads at 7. 1% versus -118. 0% for REKR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CEVA leads at 88. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is REKR or AIOT or SAIC or CEVA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) trades at 9.
3x forward P/E versus 67. 3x for CEVA, Inc. — 58. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for REKR: 249. 2% to $3. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — REKR or AIOT or SAIC or CEVA?
In this comparison, AIOT (22.
2% yield), SAIC (1. 6% yield) pay a dividend. REKR, CEVA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is REKR or AIOT or SAIC or CEVA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
26), 1. 6% yield, +104. 4% 10Y return). Rekor Systems, Inc. (REKR) carries a higher beta of 2. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SAIC: +104. 4%, REKR: -71. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between REKR and AIOT and SAIC and CEVA?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: REKR is a small-cap high-growth stock; AIOT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SAIC is a small-cap deep-value stock; CEVA is a small-cap quality compounder stock. AIOT, SAIC pay a dividend while REKR, CEVA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.