REPX
Riley Exploration Permian, Inc.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Cap$743M
5Y Perf.+430.7%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
REPX vs FANG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Cap$53.57B
5Y Perf.+347.3%
REPX vs FANG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | REPX | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $743M | $53.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $403M | $15.19B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $62M | $403M |
| Gross Margin | 63.5% | 41.8% |
| Operating Margin | 32.1% | 22.1% |
| Forward P/E | 6.4x | 10.7x |
| Total Debt | $255M | $14.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $18M | $106M |
REPX vs FANG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
REPX
FANG
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Riley Exploration P… (REPX) | 100 | 530.7 | +430.7% |
| Diamondback Energy,… (FANG) | 100 | 447.3 | +347.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: REPX vs FANG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: REPX leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Diamondback Energy, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
REPX
Riley Exploration Permian, Inc.
The Income Pick
REPX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.47, yield 4.6%
- 183.6% 10Y total return vs FANG's 162.5%
- Beta 0.47, yield 4.6%, current ratio 0.60x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
The Growth Play
FANG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 36.3%, EPS growth -63.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.09, Low D/E 33.7%, current ratio 0.42x
- 36.3% revenue growth vs REPX's -4.4%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | FANG | 36.3% revenue growth vs REPX's -4.4% |
| Value | REPX | Lower P/E (6.4x vs 10.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | REPX | 15.3% margin vs FANG's 2.7% |
| Stability / Safety | FANG | Beta 0.09 vs REPX's 0.47, lower leverage |
| Dividends | REPX | 4.6% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs FANG's 2.1% |
| Momentum (1Y) | FANG | +50.1% vs REPX's +43.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | REPX | 5.4% ROA vs FANG's 0.6%, ROIC 12.9% vs 6.7% |
REPX vs FANG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
REPX vs FANG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLREPXLAGGINGFANG
FANGDiamondback Energy, I…
2leads
REPXRiley Exploration Per…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs FANGMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
REPX5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
REPX6/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
REPX8/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
FANG4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
FANG2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
REPX2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
REPX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FANG is the larger business by revenue, generating $15.2B annually — 37.7x REPX's $403M. REPX is the more profitable business, keeping 15.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FANG's 2.7%. On growth, REPX holds the edge at +11.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | REPXRiley Exploration… | FANGDiamondback Energ… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $403M | $15.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $229M | $8.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $62M | $403M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $68M | $1.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.5% | +41.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +32.1% | +22.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | +2.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.9% | +10.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.2% | +5.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.5% | -98.3% |
REPX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
REPX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.5x trailing earnings, REPX trades at a 86% valuation discount to FANG's 33.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, REPX's 4.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FANG's 6.8x.
| Metric | REPXRiley Exploration… | FANGDiamondback Energ… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $743M | $53.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $980M | $68.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 4.51x | 33.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.41x | 10.68x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.18x | 6.83x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.89x | 3.57x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.14x | 1.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.61x | 10.23x |
REPX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
REPX leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
REPX delivers a 10.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $1 for FANG. FANG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to REPX's 0.40x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), REPX scores 6/9 vs FANG's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | REPXRiley Exploration… | FANGDiamondback Energ… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.7% | +0.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.4% | +0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.9% | +6.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.0% | +7.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.40x | 0.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $237M | $14.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $18M | $106M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $255M | $14.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.60x | 0.66x |
REPX leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FANG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FANG five years ago would be worth $26,372 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,039 for REPX. Over the past 12 months, FANG leads with a +50.1% total return vs REPX's +43.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FANG at 16.3% vs REPX's -3.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | REPXRiley Exploration… | FANGDiamondback Energ… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +31.7% | +25.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +43.9% | +50.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.8% | +57.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.4% | +163.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +183.6% | +162.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.0% | +16.3% |
FANG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FANG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FANG is the less volatile stock with a 0.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than REPX's 0.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FANG currently trades 88.8% from its 52-week high vs REPX's 83.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | REPXRiley Exploration… | FANGDiamondback Energ… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.47x | 0.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $40.98 | $214.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $24.08 | $127.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.5% | +88.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.3 | 49.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 457K | 3.4M |
FANG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
REPX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates REPX as "Buy" and FANG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.1% upside for REPX (target: $37) vs 5.7% for FANG (target: $201). For income investors, REPX offers the higher dividend yield at 4.59% vs FANG's 2.10%.
| Metric | REPXRiley Exploration… | FANGDiamondback Energ… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $37.00 | $201.27 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 51 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.6% | +2.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.57 | $4.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | +3.8% |
REPX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
REPX leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). FANG leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
Best OverallRiley Exploration Permian, … (REPX)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
REPX vs FANG: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is REPX or FANG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Diamondback Energy, Inc.
(FANG) is the stronger pick with 36. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 4% for Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. (REPX). Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. (REPX) offers the better valuation at 4. 5x trailing P/E (6. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. (REPX) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — REPX or FANG?
On trailing P/E, Riley Exploration Permian, Inc.
(REPX) is the cheapest at 4. 5x versus Diamondback Energy, Inc. at 33. 2x. On forward P/E, Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — REPX or FANG?
Over the past 5 years, Diamondback Energy, Inc.
(FANG) delivered a total return of +163. 7%, compared to +20. 4% for Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. (REPX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: REPX returned +183. 6% versus FANG's +162. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — REPX or FANG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Diamondback Energy, Inc.
(FANG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 09β versus Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. 's 0. 47β — meaning REPX is approximately 424% more volatile than FANG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 40% for Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — REPX or FANG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Diamondback Energy, Inc.
(FANG) is pulling ahead at 36. 3% versus -4. 4% for Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. (REPX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. grew EPS 78. 2% year-over-year, compared to -63. 1% for Diamondback Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FANG leads at 16. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — REPX or FANG?
Riley Exploration Permian, Inc.
(REPX) is the more profitable company, earning 41. 0% net margin versus 11. 1% for Diamondback Energy, Inc. — meaning it keeps 41. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: REPX leads at 36. 0% versus 32. 7% for FANG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — REPX leads at 46. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is REPX or FANG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Riley Exploration Permian, Inc.
(REPX) trades at 6. 4x forward P/E versus 10. 7x for Diamondback Energy, Inc. — 4. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for REPX: 8. 1% to $37. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — REPX or FANG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. (REPX) offers the highest yield at 4. 6%, versus 2. 1% for Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG).
09Is REPX or FANG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Diamondback Energy, Inc.
(FANG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 09), 2. 1% yield, +162. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FANG: +162. 5%, REPX: +183. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between REPX and FANG?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: REPX is a small-cap deep-value stock; FANG is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(REPX: 11.2% · FANG: 5.2%)Net Margin>
%
(REPX: 15.3% · FANG: 2.7%)P/E Ratio<
x
(REPX: 4.5x · FANG: 33.2x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.