Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
RES vs LBRT vs PUMP vs ACDC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
RES vs LBRT vs PUMP vs ACDC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $1.64B | $5.26B | $1.93B | $1.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.63B | $4.05B | $1.18B | $1.94B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $32M | $150M | $-12M | $-367M |
| Gross Margin | 14.3% | 10.7% | 8.3% | 3.7% |
| Operating Margin | 3.5% | 1.5% | -1.1% | -8.5% |
| Forward P/E | 35.7x | 3568.1x | 2021.8x | — |
| Total Debt | $95M | $873M | $249M | $1.14B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $210M | $28M | $91M | $23M |
RES vs LBRT vs PUMP vs ACDC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| RPC, Inc. (RES) | 100 | 78.8 | -21.2% |
| Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT) | 100 | 199.6 | +99.6% |
| ProPetro Holding Co… (PUMP) | 100 | 120.8 | +20.8% |
| ProFrac Holding Cor… (ACDC) | 100 | 39.1 | -60.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RES vs LBRT vs PUMP vs ACDC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RES carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.54, yield 2.2%
- Rev growth 15.0%, EPS growth -65.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.54, Low D/E 8.7%, current ratio 3.24x
- Beta 0.54, yield 2.2%, current ratio 3.24x
LBRT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 98.8% 10Y total return vs PUMP's 8.8%
- 3.7% margin vs ACDC's -18.9%
- 4.0% ROA vs ACDC's -13.1%, ROIC 2.3% vs -4.6%
PUMP is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +199.8% vs ACDC's +56.4%
ACDC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.0% revenue growth vs PUMP's -12.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.7% margin vs ACDC's -18.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.54 vs LBRT's 1.31, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, vs LBRT's 1.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +199.8% vs ACDC's +56.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.0% ROA vs ACDC's -13.1%, ROIC 2.3% vs -4.6% |
RES vs LBRT vs PUMP vs ACDC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RES vs LBRT vs PUMP vs ACDC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RES leads in 2 of 6 categories
LBRT leads 1 • PUMP leads 0 • ACDC leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RES leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LBRT is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.0B annually — 3.4x PUMP's $1.2B. LBRT is the more profitable business, keeping 3.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACDC's -18.9%. On growth, RES holds the edge at +27.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.6B | $4.0B | $1.2B | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $218M | $549M | $154M | $251M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $32M | $150M | -$12M | -$367M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $53M | -$193M | -$11M | $20M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.3% | +10.7% | +8.3% | +3.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.5% | +1.5% | -1.1% | -8.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.0% | +3.7% | -1.1% | -18.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.3% | -4.8% | -0.9% | +1.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.0% | +4.5% | -24.7% | -4.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -124.9% | +16.7% | -134.2% | -33.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — RES and ACDC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 36.5x trailing earnings, LBRT trades at a 98% valuation discount to PUMP's 2021.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RES's 7.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PUMP's 10.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $5.3B | $1.9B | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $6.1B | $2.1B | $2.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 49.20x | 36.48x | 2021.79x | -3.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 35.74x | 3568.13x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.97x | 10.50x | 10.81x | 8.54x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.01x | 1.31x | 1.52x | 0.66x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.47x | 2.59x | 2.00x | 1.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 30.91x | 373.05x | 45.52x | 65.81x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RES leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LBRT delivers a 7.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-38 for ACDC. RES carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ACDC's 1.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PUMP scores 5/9 vs ACDC's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.9% | +7.4% | -1.4% | -38.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.2% | +4.0% | -1.0% | -13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.8% | +2.3% | +1.4% | -4.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.6% | +3.0% | +1.8% | -6.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 0.42x | 0.30x | 1.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$115M | $846M | $158M | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $210M | $28M | $91M | $23M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $95M | $873M | $249M | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.86x | 5.24x | -0.86x | -1.22x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LBRT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LBRT five years ago would be worth $25,534 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,937 for ACDC. Over the past 12 months, PUMP leads with a +199.8% total return vs ACDC's +56.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LBRT at 39.7% vs ACDC's -11.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +34.2% | +72.5% | +60.6% | +76.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +58.4% | +193.5% | +199.8% | +56.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.1% | +172.7% | +136.1% | -30.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +43.1% | +155.3% | +50.8% | -60.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.7% | +98.8% | +8.8% | -60.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.2% | +39.7% | +33.2% | -11.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RES and LBRT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RES is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LBRT's 1.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LBRT currently trades 94.3% from its 52-week high vs ACDC's 66.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.54x | 1.31x | 1.12x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.16 | $34.41 | $18.50 | $10.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.18 | $9.90 | $4.51 | $3.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.4% | +94.3% | +85.2% | +66.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.7 | 66.4 | 59.3 | 63.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.3M | 4.2M | 3.5M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — RES and LBRT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RES as "Hold", LBRT as "Buy", PUMP as "Buy", ACDC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 4.7% upside for LBRT (target: $34) vs -18.7% for RES (target: $6). For income investors, RES offers the higher dividend yield at 2.17% vs LBRT's 1.01%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.00 | $34.00 | $14.75 | $6.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 36 | 19 | 30 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | +1.0% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.16 | $0.33 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +0.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RES leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LBRT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
RES vs LBRT vs PUMP vs ACDC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RES or LBRT or PUMP or ACDC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, RPC, Inc.
(RES) is the stronger pick with 15. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 1% for ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP). Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT) offers the better valuation at 36. 5x trailing P/E (3568. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RES or LBRT or PUMP or ACDC?
On trailing P/E, Liberty Energy Inc.
(LBRT) is the cheapest at 36. 5x versus ProPetro Holding Corp. at 2021. 8x. On forward P/E, RPC, Inc. is actually cheaper at 35. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RES or LBRT or PUMP or ACDC?
Over the past 5 years, Liberty Energy Inc.
(LBRT) delivered a total return of +155. 3%, compared to -60. 6% for ProFrac Holding Corp. (ACDC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LBRT returned +98. 8% versus ACDC's -60. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RES or LBRT or PUMP or ACDC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), RPC, Inc.
(RES) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 54β versus Liberty Energy Inc. 's 1. 31β — meaning LBRT is approximately 142% more volatile than RES relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, RPC, Inc. (RES) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 130% for ProFrac Holding Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RES or LBRT or PUMP or ACDC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), RPC, Inc.
(RES) is pulling ahead at 15. 0% versus -12. 1% for ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ProPetro Holding Corp. grew EPS 100. 6% year-over-year, compared to -66. 7% for ProFrac Holding Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RES leads at 0. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RES or LBRT or PUMP or ACDC?
Liberty Energy Inc.
(LBRT) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 7% net margin versus -19. 0% for ProFrac Holding Corp. — meaning it keeps 3. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RES leads at 3. 5% versus -6. 9% for ACDC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RES leads at 14. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RES or LBRT or PUMP or ACDC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, RPC, Inc.
(RES) trades at 35. 7x forward P/E versus 3568. 1x for Liberty Energy Inc. — 3532. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LBRT: 4. 7% to $34. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — RES or LBRT or PUMP or ACDC?
In this comparison, RES (2.
2% yield), LBRT (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. PUMP, ACDC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RES or LBRT or PUMP or ACDC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, RPC, Inc.
(RES) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 54), 2. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RES: -35. 7%, PUMP: +8. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RES and LBRT and PUMP and ACDC?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
RES, LBRT pay a dividend while PUMP, ACDC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.