Agricultural - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
REVG vs OSUR vs QDEL vs WNC vs HOLX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Agricultural - Machinery
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
REVG vs OSUR vs QDEL vs WNC vs HOLX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural - Machinery | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Agricultural - Machinery | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $3.12B | $225M | $733M | $317M | $16.97B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.40B | $85M | $2.66B | $1.47B | $4.13B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $108M | $-53M | $-1.21B | $-65M | $544M |
| Gross Margin | 14.4% | 38.8% | 56.6% | 2.0% | 52.8% |
| Operating Margin | 7.1% | -58.6% | -37.0% | -3.1% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | 17.2x | — | 6.4x | 1.5x | 17.2x |
| Total Debt | $56M | $13M | $2.80B | $443M | $2.63B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $35M | $199K | $170M | $32M | $1.96B |
REVG vs OSUR vs QDEL vs WNC vs HOLX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Jan 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| REV Group, Inc. (REVG) | 100 | 1047.5 | +947.5% |
| OraSure Technologie… (OSUR) | 100 | 19.2 | -80.8% |
| QuidelOrtho Corpora… (QDEL) | 100 | 15.5 | -84.5% |
| Wabash National Cor… (WNC) | 100 | 106.1 | +6.1% |
| Hologic, Inc. (HOLX) | 100 | 141.4 | +41.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: REVG vs OSUR vs QDEL vs WNC vs HOLX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
REVG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.48, yield 0.4%
- Rev growth 3.5%, EPS growth -60.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.9%
- 174.2% 10Y total return vs HOLX's 124.3%
- 3.5% revenue growth vs OSUR's -38.1%
OSUR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.45, Low D/E 3.9%, current ratio 6.58x
Among these 5 stocks, QDEL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
WNC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (1.5x vs 17.2x)
- 4.2% yield, vs REVG's 0.4%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
HOLX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.
- Beta 0.41, current ratio 3.75x
- 13.2% margin vs OSUR's -61.9%
- Beta 0.41 vs QDEL's 2.59, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.5% revenue growth vs OSUR's -38.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.5x vs 17.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.2% margin vs OSUR's -61.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.41 vs QDEL's 2.59, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, vs REVG's 0.4%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +80.3% vs QDEL's -58.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.9% ROA vs QDEL's -20.7%, ROIC 29.9% vs -13.6% |
REVG vs OSUR vs QDEL vs WNC vs HOLX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
REVG vs OSUR vs QDEL vs WNC vs HOLX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HOLX leads in 2 of 6 categories
REVG leads 1 • OSUR leads 0 • QDEL leads 0 • WNC leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOLX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOLX is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.1B annually — 48.5x OSUR's $85M. HOLX is the more profitable business, keeping 13.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OSUR's -61.9%. On growth, REVG holds the edge at +11.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.4B | $85M | $2.7B | $1.5B | $4.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $193M | -$45M | -$649M | -$2M | $974M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $108M | -$53M | -$1.2B | -$65M | $544M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $200M | -$33M | -$75M | -$38M | $1000M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.4% | +38.8% | +56.6% | +2.0% | +52.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | -58.6% | -37.0% | -3.1% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.5% | -61.9% | -45.6% | -4.4% | +13.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.3% | -38.9% | -2.8% | -2.6% | +24.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.3% | -99.9% | -10.5% | -20.4% | +2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +68.6% | -52.4% | -6.1% | -120.7% | -9.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — QDEL and WNC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.5x trailing earnings, WNC trades at a 95% valuation discount to REVG's 33.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WNC's 1.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HOLX's 17.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.1B | $225M | $733M | $317M | $17.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $238M | $3.4B | $728M | $17.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 33.81x | -3.33x | -0.65x | 1.54x | 30.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.18x | — | 6.45x | — | 17.21x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.35x | — | — | 1.92x | 17.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.27x | 1.96x | 0.27x | 0.21x | 4.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.73x | 0.67x | 0.38x | 0.88x | 3.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.41x | — | — | — | 18.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — REVG and OSUR each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
REVG delivers a 27.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $-56 for QDEL. OSUR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to QDEL's 1.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), REVG scores 7/9 vs OSUR's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +27.9% | -15.1% | -56.3% | -17.3% | +11.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.9% | -12.8% | -20.7% | -5.0% | +6.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +29.9% | -20.0% | -13.6% | +37.4% | +9.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +27.0% | -16.8% | -18.0% | +32.6% | +8.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 0.04x | 1.46x | 1.20x | 0.52x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $21M | $13M | $2.6B | $411M | $667M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $35M | $199,278 | $170M | $32M | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $56M | $13M | $2.8B | $443M | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.03x | — | -5.18x | -0.97x | 8.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
REVG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in REVG five years ago would be worth $36,117 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $891 for QDEL. Over the past 12 months, REVG leads with a +80.3% total return vs QDEL's -58.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors REVG at 85.2% vs QDEL's -50.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.6% | +31.5% | -62.6% | -11.0% | +1.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +80.3% | +12.2% | -58.3% | +0.4% | +37.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +535.6% | -55.2% | -87.8% | -63.9% | -8.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +261.2% | -68.3% | -91.1% | -48.5% | +15.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +174.2% | -53.1% | -34.9% | -22.6% | +124.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +85.2% | -23.5% | -50.4% | -28.8% | -2.9% |
Risk & Volatility
HOLX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HOLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.41 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than QDEL's 2.59 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HOLX currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs QDEL's 27.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | 1.45x | 2.59x | 1.93x | 0.41x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $69.92 | $3.82 | $38.99 | $12.94 | $76.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $34.96 | $2.08 | $10.22 | $7.10 | $52.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.4% | +81.9% | +27.6% | +60.3% | +100.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.6 | 47.1 | 35.2 | 37.7 | 69.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 473K | 2.2M | 598K | 10.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — OSUR and WNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: REVG as "Hold", OSUR as "Hold", QDEL as "Buy", WNC as "Hold", HOLX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 124.4% upside for WNC (target: $18) vs -13.9% for REVG (target: $55). For income investors, WNC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.23% vs REVG's 0.40%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $55.00 | $4.00 | $17.00 | $17.50 | $79.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 13 | 15 | 18 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | — | — | +4.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.26 | — | — | $0.33 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.5% | +6.7% | 0.0% | +10.6% | +4.4% |
HOLX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). REVG leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
REVG vs OSUR vs QDEL vs WNC vs HOLX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is REVG or OSUR or QDEL or WNC or HOLX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, REV Group, Inc.
(REVG) is the stronger pick with 3. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -38. 1% for OraSure Technologies, Inc. (OSUR). Wabash National Corporation (WNC) offers the better valuation at 1. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate QuidelOrtho Corporation (QDEL) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — REVG or OSUR or QDEL or WNC or HOLX?
On trailing P/E, Wabash National Corporation (WNC) is the cheapest at 1.
5x versus REV Group, Inc. at 33. 8x. On forward P/E, QuidelOrtho Corporation is actually cheaper at 6. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — REVG or OSUR or QDEL or WNC or HOLX?
Over the past 5 years, REV Group, Inc.
(REVG) delivered a total return of +261. 2%, compared to -91. 1% for QuidelOrtho Corporation (QDEL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: REVG returned +174. 2% versus OSUR's -53. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — REVG or OSUR or QDEL or WNC or HOLX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hologic, Inc.
(HOLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 41β versus QuidelOrtho Corporation's 2. 59β — meaning QDEL is approximately 530% more volatile than HOLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, OraSure Technologies, Inc. (OSUR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 146% for QuidelOrtho Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — REVG or OSUR or QDEL or WNC or HOLX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), REV Group, Inc.
(REVG) is pulling ahead at 3. 5% versus -38. 1% for OraSure Technologies, Inc. (OSUR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Wabash National Corporation grew EPS 179. 2% year-over-year, compared to -261. 5% for OraSure Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, REVG leads at 1. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — REVG or OSUR or QDEL or WNC or HOLX?
Hologic, Inc.
(HOLX) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 8% net margin versus -59. 8% for OraSure Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WNC leads at 20. 8% versus -59. 2% for OSUR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HOLX leads at 61. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is REVG or OSUR or QDEL or WNC or HOLX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, QuidelOrtho Corporation (QDEL) trades at 6.
4x forward P/E versus 17. 2x for Hologic, Inc. — 10. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WNC: 124. 4% to $17. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — REVG or OSUR or QDEL or WNC or HOLX?
In this comparison, WNC (4.
2% yield), REVG (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. OSUR, QDEL, HOLX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is REVG or OSUR or QDEL or WNC or HOLX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hologic, Inc.
(HOLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 41), +124. 3% 10Y return). QuidelOrtho Corporation (QDEL) carries a higher beta of 2. 59 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HOLX: +124. 3%, QDEL: -34. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between REVG and OSUR and QDEL and WNC and HOLX?
These companies operate in different sectors (REVG (Industrials) and OSUR (Healthcare) and QDEL (Healthcare) and WNC (Industrials) and HOLX (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: REVG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OSUR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; QDEL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WNC is a small-cap deep-value stock; HOLX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. WNC pays a dividend while REVG, OSUR, QDEL, HOLX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.