Electrical Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RFIL vs MTSI vs COHU vs DCOM vs APH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Banks - Regional
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
RFIL vs MTSI vs COHU vs DCOM vs APH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Banks - Regional | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $161M | $25.84B | $2.23B | $1.64B | $167.94B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $80M | $1.07B | $481M | $730M | $25.90B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $270K | $177M | $-56M | $111M | $4.48B |
| Gross Margin | 32.0% | 55.3% | 25.7% | 56.1% | 37.3% |
| Operating Margin | 3.4% | 16.0% | -10.6% | 21.5% | 26.0% |
| Forward P/E | 25.7x | 76.9x | 89.2x | 10.7x | 29.3x |
| Total Debt | $27M | $538M | $359M | $371M | $15.50B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $112M | $227M | $2.35B | $11.13B |
RFIL vs MTSI vs COHU vs DCOM vs APH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| RF Industries, Ltd. (RFIL) | 100 | 268.5 | +168.5% |
| MACOM Technology So… (MTSI) | 100 | 1084.9 | +984.9% |
| Cohu, Inc. (COHU) | 100 | 315.3 | +215.3% |
| Dime Community Banc… (DCOM) | 100 | 175.0 | +75.0% |
| Amphenol Corporation (APH) | 100 | 565.9 | +465.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RFIL vs MTSI vs COHU vs DCOM vs APH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RFIL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +275.6% vs DCOM's +46.6%
MTSI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, COHU doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
DCOM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.05, yield 2.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.05, Low D/E 25.1%, current ratio 0.25x
- Beta 1.05, yield 2.7%, current ratio 0.25x
- Lower P/E (10.7x vs 89.2x)
APH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 51.7%, EPS growth 74.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.3%
- 9.0% 10Y total return vs MTSI's 8.0%
- PEG 1.05 vs DCOM's 1.68
- 51.7% revenue growth vs COHU's 12.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 51.7% revenue growth vs COHU's 12.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.7x vs 89.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.3% margin vs COHU's -11.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.05 vs COHU's 2.13, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs APH's 0.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +275.6% vs DCOM's +46.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.6% ROA vs COHU's -4.9%, ROIC 28.3% vs -5.7% |
RFIL vs MTSI vs COHU vs DCOM vs APH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
RFIL vs MTSI vs COHU vs DCOM vs APH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DCOM leads in 2 of 6 categories
APH leads 1 • MTSI leads 1 • RFIL leads 0 • COHU leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — DCOM and APH each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
APH is the larger business by revenue, generating $25.9B annually — 322.4x RFIL's $80M. APH is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to COHU's -11.5%. On growth, APH holds the edge at +58.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $80M | $1.1B | $481M | $730M | $25.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | $210M | -$11M | $161M | $7.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $270,000 | $177M | -$56M | $111M | $4.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4M | $168M | $32M | $182M | $4.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.0% | +55.3% | +25.7% | +56.1% | +37.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | +16.0% | -10.6% | +21.5% | +26.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.3% | +16.5% | -11.5% | +15.2% | +17.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | +15.6% | +6.6% | +25.0% | +17.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.2% | +22.5% | +29.3% | — | +58.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | +42.9% | +60.6% | +2.3% | +24.1% |
Valuation Metrics
DCOM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.7x trailing earnings, DCOM trades at a 99% valuation discount to RFIL's 2130.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), APH offers better value at 1.47x vs DCOM's 2.47x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $161M | $25.8B | $2.2B | $1.6B | $167.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $183M | $26.3B | $2.4B | -$341M | $172.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2130.00x | -471.88x | -29.86x | 15.73x | 40.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.71x | 76.91x | 89.21x | 10.72x | 29.29x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 2.47x | 1.47x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 34.63x | 136.13x | — | -2.18x | 24.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.00x | 26.71x | 4.93x | 2.25x | 7.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.56x | 19.20x | 2.82x | 1.09x | 12.92x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 37.12x | 134.01x | 207.83x | 9.00x | 38.36x |
Profitability & Efficiency
APH leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
APH delivers a 34.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $35 in annual profit, vs $-7 for COHU. DCOM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.25x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to APH's 1.15x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RFIL scores 8/9 vs COHU's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.8% | +13.2% | -6.8% | +7.7% | +34.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +8.6% | -4.9% | +0.8% | +13.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.6% | +6.0% | -5.7% | +5.6% | +28.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.2% | +7.6% | -5.9% | +6.1% | +25.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.76x | 0.41x | 0.46x | 0.25x | 1.15x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $22M | $426M | $132M | -$2.0B | $4.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $112M | $227M | $2.4B | $11.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $27M | $538M | $359M | $371M | $15.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 391.47x | -168.82x | 0.57x | 13.54x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MTSI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MTSI five years ago would be worth $61,359 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,218 for COHU. Over the past 12 months, RFIL leads with a +275.6% total return vs DCOM's +46.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MTSI at 84.4% vs COHU's 12.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +162.5% | +96.9% | +92.9% | +26.4% | -2.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +275.6% | +203.8% | +199.7% | +46.6% | +70.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +274.6% | +526.9% | +40.7% | +129.1% | +267.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +130.8% | +513.6% | +22.2% | +22.7% | +308.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +545.3% | +795.9% | +330.2% | +68.6% | +899.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +55.3% | +84.4% | +12.1% | +31.8% | +54.3% |
Risk & Volatility
DCOM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DCOM is the less volatile stock with a 1.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COHU's 2.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DCOM currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs APH's 81.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.01x | 1.75x | 2.13x | 1.05x | 1.62x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.45 | $355.00 | $50.68 | $37.87 | $167.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.82 | $110.09 | $15.34 | $24.57 | $79.27 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.5% | +97.0% | +93.7% | +98.4% | +81.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.7 | 71.3 | 75.5 | 60.5 | 45.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 250K | 1.1M | 953K | 271K | 8.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — DCOM and APH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RFIL as "Buy", MTSI as "Buy", COHU as "Buy", DCOM as "Hold", APH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 32.0% upside for APH (target: $180) vs -26.3% for MTSI (target: $254). For income investors, DCOM offers the higher dividend yield at 2.68% vs APH's 0.46%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $254.00 | $49.75 | $39.50 | $180.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 23 | 14 | 10 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +2.7% | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.00 | $0.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% | +0.3% | 0.0% | +0.4% |
DCOM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). APH leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
RFIL vs MTSI vs COHU vs DCOM vs APH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RFIL or MTSI or COHU or DCOM or APH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Amphenol Corporation (APH) is the stronger pick with 51.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 7% for Cohu, Inc. (COHU). Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. (DCOM) offers the better valuation at 15. 7x trailing P/E (10. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate RF Industries, Ltd. (RFIL) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RFIL or MTSI or COHU or DCOM or APH?
On trailing P/E, Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.
(DCOM) is the cheapest at 15. 7x versus RF Industries, Ltd. at 2130. 0x. On forward P/E, Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Amphenol Corporation wins at 1. 05x versus Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 68x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RFIL or MTSI or COHU or DCOM or APH?
Over the past 5 years, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
(MTSI) delivered a total return of +513. 6%, compared to +22. 2% for Cohu, Inc. (COHU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APH returned +899. 3% versus DCOM's +68. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RFIL or MTSI or COHU or DCOM or APH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.
(DCOM) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 05β versus Cohu, Inc. 's 2. 13β — meaning COHU is approximately 104% more volatile than DCOM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. (DCOM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 115% for Amphenol Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RFIL or MTSI or COHU or DCOM or APH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amphenol Corporation (APH) is pulling ahead at 51.
7% versus 12. 7% for Cohu, Inc. (COHU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 330. 9% year-over-year, compared to -170. 2% for MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, APH leads at 22. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RFIL or MTSI or COHU or DCOM or APH?
Amphenol Corporation (APH) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
5% net margin versus -16. 4% for Cohu, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: APH leads at 25. 9% versus -13. 3% for COHU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DCOM leads at 56. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RFIL or MTSI or COHU or DCOM or APH more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Amphenol Corporation (APH) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 05x versus Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 68x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. (DCOM) trades at 10. 7x forward P/E versus 89. 2x for Cohu, Inc. — 78. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for APH: 32. 0% to $180. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — RFIL or MTSI or COHU or DCOM or APH?
In this comparison, DCOM (2.
7% yield), APH (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. RFIL, MTSI, COHU do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RFIL or MTSI or COHU or DCOM or APH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.
(DCOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 05), 2. 7% yield). Cohu, Inc. (COHU) carries a higher beta of 2. 13 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DCOM: +68. 6%, COHU: +330. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RFIL and MTSI and COHU and DCOM and APH?
These companies operate in different sectors (RFIL (Industrials) and MTSI (Technology) and COHU (Technology) and DCOM (Financial Services) and APH (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RFIL is a small-cap high-growth stock; MTSI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; COHU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DCOM is a small-cap deep-value stock; APH is a mid-cap high-growth stock. DCOM pays a dividend while RFIL, MTSI, COHU, APH do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.