Restaurants
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
RICK vs DIS vs CMCSA vs PLAY vs AMC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Telecommunications Services
Entertainment
Entertainment
RICK vs DIS vs CMCSA vs PLAY vs AMC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Entertainment | Telecommunications Services | Entertainment | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $216M | $180.41B | $81.73B | $416M | $1.73B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $282M | $97.26B | $125.28B | $2.09B | $5.03B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $11.22B | $18.60B | $-65M | $-547M |
| Gross Margin | 55.2% | 37.2% | 61.7% | 66.8% | 75.3% |
| Operating Margin | 12.3% | 15.5% | 15.3% | 4.3% | 46.5% |
| Forward P/E | 4.6x | 15.2x | 6.4x | 94.6x | — |
| Total Debt | $266M | $44.88B | $110.44B | $3.17B | $8.14B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $34M | $5.70B | $9.48B | $17M | $429M |
RICK vs DIS vs CMCSA vs PLAY vs AMC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| RCI Hospitality Hol… (RICK) | 100 | 204.0 | +104.0% |
| The Walt Disney Com… (DIS) | 100 | 93.2 | -6.8% |
| Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) | 100 | 57.5 | -42.5% |
| Dave & Buster's Ent… (PLAY) | 100 | 89.6 | -10.4% |
| AMC Entertainment H… (AMC) | 100 | 6.6 | -93.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RICK vs DIS vs CMCSA vs PLAY vs AMC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RICK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Better valuation composite
DIS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 13.5% 10Y total return vs RICK's 188.5%
CMCSA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 17 yrs, beta 0.08, yield 6.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.08, current ratio 0.88x
- Beta 0.08, yield 6.0%, current ratio 0.88x
- 14.8% margin vs AMC's -10.9%
Among these 5 stocks, PLAY doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
AMC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 4.6%, EPS growth -16.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.4%
- 4.6% revenue growth vs RICK's -5.5%
- -6.3% vs PLAY's -62.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.6% revenue growth vs RICK's -5.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.8% margin vs AMC's -10.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.08 vs AMC's 1.81 | |
| Dividends | 6.0% yield, 17-year raise streak, vs RICK's 1.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -6.3% vs PLAY's -62.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.9% ROA vs AMC's -6.9%, ROIC 8.2% vs 23.7% |
RICK vs DIS vs CMCSA vs PLAY vs AMC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RICK vs DIS vs CMCSA vs PLAY vs AMC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CMCSA leads in 2 of 6 categories
DIS leads 2 • AMC leads 1 • RICK leads 0 • PLAY leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CMCSA is the larger business by revenue, generating $125.3B annually — 444.8x RICK's $282M. CMCSA is the more profitable business, keeping 14.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMC's -10.9%. On growth, AMC holds the edge at +21.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $282M | $97.3B | $125.3B | $2.1B | $5.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $51M | $20.5B | $35.4B | $377M | $2.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | $11.2B | $18.6B | -$65M | -$547M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $39M | $7.1B | $18.1B | -$33M | -$124M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.2% | +37.2% | +61.7% | +66.8% | +75.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.3% | +15.5% | +15.3% | +4.3% | +46.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | +11.5% | +14.8% | -3.1% | -10.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.0% | +7.3% | +14.5% | -1.6% | -2.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.3% | +6.5% | +5.3% | -1.5% | +21.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -111.1% | -29.8% | -32.6% | -74.2% | +53.2% |
Valuation Metrics
CMCSA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.2x trailing earnings, CMCSA trades at a 82% valuation discount to RICK's 23.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CMCSA's 5.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DIS's 11.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $216M | $180.4B | $81.7B | $416M | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $449M | $219.6B | $182.7B | $3.6B | $9.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.98x | 15.17x | 4.16x | -8.54x | -2.30x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 4.63x | 15.22x | 6.39x | 94.62x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.22x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.75x | 11.46x | 4.95x | 9.27x | 5.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.77x | 1.91x | 0.66x | 0.20x | 0.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.96x | 1.64x | 0.84x | 4.54x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.19x | 17.90x | 3.73x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
DIS leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CMCSA delivers a 19.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $-53 for PLAY. DIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.39x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLAY's 34.71x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DIS scores 8/9 vs AMC's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.6% | +9.8% | +19.5% | -53.1% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.1% | +5.6% | +6.9% | -1.6% | -6.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.5% | +6.9% | +8.2% | +2.4% | +23.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.8% | +8.5% | +8.9% | +2.9% | +29.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.02x | 0.39x | 1.13x | 34.71x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $233M | $39.2B | $101.0B | $3.1B | $7.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $34M | $5.7B | $9.5B | $17M | $429M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $266M | $44.9B | $110.4B | $3.2B | $8.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.39x | 9.95x | 6.84x | 0.46x | 0.35x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DIS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DIS five years ago would be worth $6,170 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $48 for AMC. Over the past 12 months, AMC leads with a -6.3% total return vs PLAY's -62.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DIS at 5.8% vs AMC's -60.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.3% | -7.1% | -21.8% | -29.9% | +75.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -27.7% | -10.8% | -30.7% | -62.7% | -6.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -62.3% | +18.5% | -35.9% | -71.6% | -93.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.5% | -38.3% | -50.5% | -69.9% | -99.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +188.5% | +13.5% | +1.2% | -73.0% | -84.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -27.7% | +5.8% | -13.8% | -34.3% | -60.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DIS and CMCSA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CMCSA is the less volatile stock with a 0.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMC's 1.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DIS currently trades 83.3% from its 52-week high vs PLAY's 33.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.33x | 0.82x | 0.08x | 1.80x | 1.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $41.37 | $124.69 | $36.66 | $35.53 | $3.60 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.76 | $92.19 | $22.39 | $9.65 | $0.93 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.3% | +83.3% | +61.2% | +33.6% | +78.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.2 | 47.5 | 28.9 | 44.2 | 75.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 47K | 7.4M | 29.3M | 1.8M | 33.6M |
Analyst Outlook
CMCSA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RICK as "Buy", DIS as "Buy", CMCSA as "Buy", PLAY as "Buy", AMC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 246.7% upside for RICK (target: $98) vs -47.0% for AMC (target: $2). For income investors, CMCSA offers the higher dividend yield at 6.00% vs DIS's 0.96%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $98.00 | $139.20 | $31.48 | $17.33 | $1.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 63 | 60 | 20 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.0% | +1.0% | +6.0% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.28 | $1.00 | $1.35 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.5% | +1.9% | +8.8% | +0.4% | 0.0% |
CMCSA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). DIS leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
RICK vs DIS vs CMCSA vs PLAY vs AMC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RICK or DIS or CMCSA or PLAY or AMC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc.
(AMC) is the stronger pick with 4. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 5% for RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (RICK). Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) offers the better valuation at 4. 2x trailing P/E (6. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (RICK) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RICK or DIS or CMCSA or PLAY or AMC?
On trailing P/E, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the cheapest at 4.
2x versus RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. at 23. 0x. On forward P/E, RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RICK or DIS or CMCSA or PLAY or AMC?
Over the past 5 years, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) delivered a total return of -38.
3%, compared to -99. 5% for AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. (AMC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RICK returned +188. 5% versus AMC's -84. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RICK or DIS or CMCSA or PLAY or AMC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
08β versus AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 81β — meaning AMC is approximately 2061% more volatile than CMCSA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 39% versus 35% for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RICK or DIS or CMCSA or PLAY or AMC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc.
(AMC) is pulling ahead at 4. 6% versus -5. 5% for RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (RICK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 272. 7% year-over-year, compared to -195. 9% for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMC leads at 7. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RICK or DIS or CMCSA or PLAY or AMC?
Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
0% net margin versus -13. 0% for AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMC leads at 38. 1% versus 5. 0% for PLAY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLAY leads at 85. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RICK or DIS or CMCSA or PLAY or AMC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc.
(RICK) trades at 4. 6x forward P/E versus 94. 6x for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. — 90. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RICK: 246. 7% to $98. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — RICK or DIS or CMCSA or PLAY or AMC?
In this comparison, CMCSA (6.
0% yield), RICK (1. 0% yield), DIS (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. PLAY, AMC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RICK or DIS or CMCSA or PLAY or AMC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
08), 6. 0% yield). AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. (AMC) carries a higher beta of 1. 81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CMCSA: +1. 2%, AMC: -84. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RICK and DIS and CMCSA and PLAY and AMC?
These companies operate in different sectors (RICK (Consumer Cyclical) and DIS (Communication Services) and CMCSA (Communication Services) and PLAY (Communication Services) and AMC (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RICK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DIS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; CMCSA is a mid-cap deep-value stock; PLAY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. RICK, DIS, CMCSA pay a dividend while PLAY, AMC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.