Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RLYB vs ARQT vs REGN vs AMGN vs ABBV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
Drug Manufacturers - General
RLYB vs ARQT vs REGN vs AMGN vs ABBV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $83M | $2.58B | $73.68B | $177.59B | $358.42B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $674K | $416M | $14.92B | $37.24B | $61.16B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-14M | $-2M | $4.42B | $7.80B | $4.23B |
| Gross Margin | 95.5% | 90.9% | 84.5% | 71.5% | 70.2% |
| Operating Margin | -56.8% | 0.8% | 24.3% | 31.6% | 26.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 77.6x | 15.3x | 14.7x | 14.3x |
| Total Debt | $154K | $6M | $2.71B | $54.60B | $69.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $43M | $3.12B | $9.13B | $5.23B |
RLYB vs ARQT vs REGN vs AMGN vs ABBV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rallybio Corporation (RLYB) | 100 | 10.8 | -89.2% |
| Arcutis Biotherapeu… (ARQT) | 100 | 88.6 | -11.4% |
| Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN) | 100 | 123.4 | +23.4% |
| Amgen Inc. (AMGN) | 100 | 136.2 | +36.2% |
| AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) | 100 | 174.2 | +74.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RLYB vs ARQT vs REGN vs AMGN vs ABBV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RLYB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.32, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 10.87x
- +5.1% vs ABBV's +11.3%
ARQT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 91.3%, EPS growth 88.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 367.3%
- 91.3% revenue growth vs RLYB's -18.4%
REGN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 2.43 vs AMGN's 5.01
- PEG 2.43 vs 5.01
- 29.6% margin vs RLYB's -21.0%
- 11.1% ROA vs RLYB's -23.2%, ROIC 8.9% vs -69.8%
AMGN is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 2.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs ABBV's 3.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
ABBV is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.34, yield 3.2%
- 295.5% 10Y total return vs AMGN's 156.4%
- Beta 0.34, yield 3.2%, current ratio 0.67x
- Beta 0.34 vs ARQT's 1.48
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 91.3% revenue growth vs RLYB's -18.4% | |
| Value | PEG 2.43 vs 5.01 | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.6% margin vs RLYB's -21.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.34 vs ARQT's 1.48 | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs ABBV's 3.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.1% vs ABBV's +11.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.1% ROA vs RLYB's -23.2%, ROIC 8.9% vs -69.8% |
RLYB vs ARQT vs REGN vs AMGN vs ABBV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RLYB vs ARQT vs REGN vs AMGN vs ABBV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ABBV leads in 1 of 6 categories
RLYB leads 0 • ARQT leads 0 • REGN leads 0 • AMGN leads 0 • 5 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABBV leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABBV is the larger business by revenue, generating $61.2B annually — 90741.8x RLYB's $674,000. REGN is the more profitable business, keeping 29.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RLYB's -21.0%. On growth, ARQT holds the edge at +60.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $674,000 | $416M | $14.9B | $37.2B | $61.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$38M | $6M | $4.2B | $15.6B | $24.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$14M | -$2M | $4.4B | $7.8B | $4.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$35M | $27M | $4.2B | $8.6B | $18.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +95.5% | +90.9% | +84.5% | +71.5% | +70.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -56.8% | +0.8% | +24.3% | +31.6% | +26.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -21.0% | -0.6% | +29.6% | +20.9% | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -51.9% | +6.5% | +27.9% | +23.1% | +30.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -29.1% | +60.1% | +19.0% | +5.8% | +10.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.4% | +55.0% | -7.2% | +4.4% | +57.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — REGN and AMGN each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.1x trailing earnings, REGN trades at a 80% valuation discount to ABBV's 85.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), REGN offers better value at 2.70x vs AMGN's 7.86x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $83M | $2.6B | $73.7B | $177.6B | $358.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $69M | $2.5B | $73.3B | $223.1B | $422.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.38x | -158.92x | 17.09x | 23.12x | 85.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 77.64x | 15.35x | 14.74x | 14.28x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.70x | 7.86x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 17.78x | 14.08x | 14.96x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 129.83x | 6.87x | 5.14x | 4.83x | 5.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.29x | 13.87x | 2.46x | 20.60x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 18.06x | 21.92x | 20.12x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — REGN and ABBV each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ABBV delivers a 62.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $62 in annual profit, vs $-25 for RLYB. RLYB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMGN's 6.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMGN scores 7/9 vs ARQT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -25.2% | -1.4% | +14.3% | +89.4% | +62.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -23.2% | -0.6% | +11.1% | +8.6% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -69.8% | -5.2% | +8.9% | +14.8% | +23.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -71.9% | -4.3% | +10.2% | +16.0% | +21.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.03x | 0.09x | 6.31x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$14M | -$37M | -$412M | $45.5B | $63.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $43M | $3.1B | $9.1B | $5.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $154,000 | $6M | $2.7B | $54.6B | $69.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 2.08x | 108.44x | 5.02x | 3.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — RLYB and AMGN and ABBV each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ABBV five years ago would be worth $20,131 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,300 for RLYB. Over the past 12 months, RLYB leads with a +510.8% total return vs ABBV's +11.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMGN at 15.0% vs RLYB's -32.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +159.0% | -28.8% | -8.5% | +1.2% | -10.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +510.8% | +50.8% | +27.1% | +22.8% | +11.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.5% | +44.9% | -5.1% | +51.9% | +50.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.0% | -39.5% | +43.6% | +46.2% | +101.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.0% | -5.2% | +90.0% | +156.4% | +295.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -32.7% | +13.2% | -1.7% | +15.0% | +14.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RLYB and ABBV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ABBV is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARQT's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RLYB currently trades 95.8% from its 52-week high vs ARQT's 65.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.32x | 1.50x | 0.81x | 0.60x | 0.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.31 | $31.77 | $821.11 | $391.29 | $244.81 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.58 | $12.42 | $476.49 | $261.43 | $176.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.8% | +65.0% | +86.4% | +84.1% | +82.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 90.0 | 54.3 | 44.9 | 39.4 | 46.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 394K | 1.3M | 631K | 2.5M | 5.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AMGN and ABBV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RLYB as "Buy", ARQT as "Buy", REGN as "Buy", AMGN as "Buy", ABBV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 71.8% upside for ARQT (target: $36) vs 6.6% for AMGN (target: $351). For income investors, ABBV offers the higher dividend yield at 3.24% vs REGN's 0.48%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $35.50 | $865.68 | $350.76 | $256.64 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 12 | 48 | 38 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.5% | +2.9% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | 15 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $3.41 | $9.45 | $6.57 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.4% | 0.0% | +0.3% |
ABBV leads in 1 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow. 5 categories are tied.
RLYB vs ARQT vs REGN vs AMGN vs ABBV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RLYB or ARQT or REGN or AMGN or ABBV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(ARQT) is the stronger pick with 91. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 0% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN). Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) offers the better valuation at 17. 1x trailing P/E (15. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Rallybio Corporation (RLYB) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RLYB or ARQT or REGN or AMGN or ABBV?
On trailing P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the cheapest at 17. 1x versus AbbVie Inc. at 85. 5x. On forward P/E, AbbVie Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. wins at 2. 43x versus Amgen Inc. 's 5. 01x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RLYB or ARQT or REGN or AMGN or ABBV?
Over the past 5 years, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) delivered a total return of +101. 3%, compared to -87. 0% for Rallybio Corporation (RLYB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ABBV returned +295. 5% versus RLYB's -87. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RLYB or ARQT or REGN or AMGN or ABBV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 34β versus Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 50β — meaning ARQT is approximately 343% more volatile than ABBV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Rallybio Corporation (RLYB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 6% for Amgen Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RLYB or ARQT or REGN or AMGN or ABBV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(ARQT) is pulling ahead at 91. 3% versus 1. 0% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 88. 8% year-over-year, compared to -0. 8% for AbbVie Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARQT leads at 367. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RLYB or ARQT or REGN or AMGN or ABBV?
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus -90. 8% for Rallybio Corporation — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ABBV leads at 32. 8% versus -95. 1% for RLYB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RLYB leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RLYB or ARQT or REGN or AMGN or ABBV more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 43x versus Amgen Inc. 's 5. 01x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) trades at 14. 3x forward P/E versus 77. 6x for Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. — 63. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ARQT: 71. 8% to $35. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — RLYB or ARQT or REGN or AMGN or ABBV?
In this comparison, ABBV (3.
2% yield), AMGN (2. 9% yield), REGN (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. RLYB, ARQT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RLYB or ARQT or REGN or AMGN or ABBV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 34), 3. 2% yield, +295. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABBV: +295. 5%, ARQT: -2. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RLYB and ARQT and REGN and AMGN and ABBV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RLYB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARQT is a small-cap high-growth stock; REGN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; AMGN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ABBV is a large-cap income-oriented stock. AMGN, ABBV pay a dividend while RLYB, ARQT, REGN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.