RMAX vs WELL

For growth investors, Welltower Inc.

(WELL) is the stronger pick with 35. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. (RMAX). RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. (RMAX) offers the better valuation at 26. 6x trailing P/E (8. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Welltower Inc. (WELL) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, RE/MAX Holdings, Inc.

(RMAX) is the cheapest at 26. 6x versus Welltower Inc. at 155. 7x. On forward P/E, RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 2x.

Over the past 5 years, Welltower Inc.

(WELL) delivered a total return of +211. 9%, compared to -65. 2% for RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. (RMAX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WELL returned +233. 9% versus RMAX's -54. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Welltower Inc.

(WELL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 13β versus RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 39β — meaning RMAX is approximately 949% more volatile than WELL relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Welltower Inc.

(WELL) is pulling ahead at 35. 8% versus -5. 2% for RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. (RMAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 8. 1% year-over-year, compared to -11. 5% for Welltower Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WELL leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

RE/MAX Holdings, Inc.

(RMAX) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 9% net margin versus 8. 8% for Welltower Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RMAX leads at 16. 1% versus 3. 3% for WELL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RMAX leads at 56. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, RE/MAX Holdings, Inc.

(RMAX) trades at 8. 2x forward P/E versus 79. 7x for Welltower Inc. — 71. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RMAX: 56. 8% to $16. 67.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Welltower Inc. (WELL) offers the highest yield at 1. 3%, versus 0. 2% for RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. (RMAX).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Welltower Inc.

(WELL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 13), 1. 3% yield, +233. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WELL: +233. 9%, RMAX: -54. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: RMAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WELL is a mid-cap high-growth stock. WELL pays a dividend while RMAX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.