Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

RMNI vs USPH vs SPWR vs AFCG vs FSLR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
RMNI
Rimini Street, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$369M
5Y Perf.+47.8%
USPH
U.S. Physical Therapy, Inc.

Medical - Care Facilities

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$903M
5Y Perf.-49.0%
SPWR
SunPower Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$925M
5Y Perf.-67.9%
AFCG
Advanced Flower Capital Inc.

REIT - Specialty

Real EstateNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$76M
5Y Perf.-66.0%
FSLR
First Solar, Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$23.63B
5Y Perf.+6.1%

RMNI vs USPH vs SPWR vs AFCG vs FSLR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
RMNI logoRMNI
USPH logoUSPH
SPWR logoSPWR
AFCG logoAFCG
FSLR logoFSLR
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationMedical - Care FacilitiesSolarREIT - SpecialtySolar
Market Cap$369M$903M$925M$76M$23.63B
Revenue (TTM)$423M$695M$315M$22M$5.42B
Net Income (TTM)$35M$11M$-42M$-20M$1.67B
Gross Margin59.9%22.0%50.4%-28.7%41.7%
Operating Margin13.7%12.5%-2.7%-39.7%33.0%
Forward P/E11.3x20.9x5.5x12.4x
Total Debt$28M$426M$188M$76M$499M
Cash & Equiv.$120M$36M$10M$39M$2.80B

RMNI vs USPH vs SPWR vs AFCG vs FSLRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

RMNI
USPH
SPWR
AFCG
FSLR
StockJul 23May 26Return
Rimini Street, Inc. (RMNI)100147.8+47.8%
U.S. Physical Thera… (USPH)10051.0-49.0%
SunPower Inc. (SPWR)10032.1-67.9%
Advanced Flower Cap… (AFCG)10034.0-66.0%
First Solar, Inc. (FSLR)100106.1+6.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: RMNI vs USPH vs SPWR vs AFCG vs FSLR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FSLR leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. U.S. Physical Therapy, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. SPWR also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
RMNI
Rimini Street, Inc.
The Value Angle

RMNI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
USPH
U.S. Physical Therapy, Inc.
The Income Pick

USPH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.00, yield 3.0%
  • Beta 1.00, yield 3.0%, current ratio 1.01x
  • Beta 1.00 vs SPWR's 2.15
  • 3.0% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs AFCG's 27.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
SPWR
SunPower Inc.
The Value Play

SPWR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.

  • Better valuation composite
Best for: value
AFCG
Advanced Flower Capital Inc.
The REIT Holding

Among these 5 stocks, AFCG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: real estate exposure
FSLR
First Solar, Inc.
The Growth Play

FSLR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 24.1%, EPS growth 18.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.8%
  • 334.7% 10Y total return vs USPH's 23.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.36, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 2.67x
  • PEG 0.40 vs RMNI's 0.58
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFSLR logoFSLR24.1% revenue growth vs AFCG's -39.6%
ValueSPWR logoSPWRBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsFSLR logoFSLR30.7% margin vs AFCG's -90.8%
Stability / SafetyUSPH logoUSPHBeta 1.00 vs SPWR's 2.15
DividendsUSPH logoUSPH3.0% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs AFCG's 27.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)FSLR logoFSLR+64.4% vs SPWR's -37.7%
Efficiency (ROA)FSLR logoFSLR12.6% ROA vs SPWR's -19.5%, ROIC 17.6% vs -5.3%

RMNI vs USPH vs SPWR vs AFCG vs FSLR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

RMNIRimini Street, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$422M
USPHU.S. Physical Therapy, Inc.
FY 2025
Net Patient Revenues
83.3%$650M
Other Revenues Including Management Contract Revenues and Industrial Injury Prevention Services Revenues
16.7%$131M
SPWRSunPower Inc.
FY 2024
Reportable Subsegments
100.0%$109M
AFCGAdvanced Flower Capital Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

FSLRFirst Solar, Inc.
FY 2025
Solar Module
100.0%$15.0B

RMNI vs USPH vs SPWR vs AFCG vs FSLR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFSLRLAGGINGAFCG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FSLR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

FSLR is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.4B annually — 247.0x AFCG's $22M. FSLR is the more profitable business, keeping 30.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AFCG's -90.8%. On growth, AFCG holds the edge at +41.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricRMNI logoRMNIRimini Street, In…USPH logoUSPHU.S. Physical The…SPWR logoSPWRSunPower Inc.AFCG logoAFCGAdvanced Flower C…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$423M$695M$315M$22M$5.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$63M$109M-$6M-$17M$2.2B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$35M$11M-$42M-$20M$1.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$47M$67M-$15M-$24M$1.7B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+59.9%+22.0%+50.4%-28.7%+41.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+13.7%+12.5%-2.7%-39.7%+33.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+8.3%+1.5%-13.2%-90.8%+30.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+11.0%+9.6%-4.6%-107.3%+30.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+1.2%+7.7%-0.2%+41.1%+23.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-72.1%-115.0%-101.3%+16.7%+65.1%
FSLR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

RMNI leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 10.3x trailing earnings, RMNI trades at a 75% valuation discount to USPH's 41.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FSLR offers better value at 0.50x vs RMNI's 0.53x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricRMNI logoRMNIRimini Street, In…USPH logoUSPHU.S. Physical The…SPWR logoSPWRSunPower Inc.AFCG logoAFCGAdvanced Flower C…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$369M$903M$925M$76M$23.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$277M$1.3B$1.1B$113M$21.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS10.31x41.75x-16.29x-3.39x15.48x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.11.32x20.91x5.45x12.39x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.53x0.50x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.50x12.58x9.64x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.88x1.16x3.00x2.42x4.53x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.17x0.41x2.48x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF6.63x14.81x6.74x19.91x
RMNI leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FSLR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

FSLR delivers a 18.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-11 for AFCG. FSLR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to USPH's 0.55x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FSLR scores 7/9 vs AFCG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricRMNI logoRMNIRimini Street, In…USPH logoUSPHU.S. Physical The…SPWR logoSPWRSunPower Inc.AFCG logoAFCGAdvanced Flower C…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+1.4%-11.1%+18.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+8.9%+0.9%-19.5%-6.4%+12.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.6%-5.3%-4.1%+17.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+55.0%+7.6%-7.2%-5.6%+15.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965547
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.55x0.43x0.05x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$92M$390M$179M$38M-$2.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$120M$36M$10M$39M$2.8B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$28M$426M$188M$76M$499M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense16.13x8.24x-1.57x-2.15x53.51x
FSLR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FSLR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FSLR five years ago would be worth $30,468 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,000 for SPWR. Over the past 12 months, FSLR leads with a +64.4% total return vs SPWR's -37.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FSLR at 7.4% vs SPWR's -41.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricRMNI logoRMNIRimini Street, In…USPH logoUSPHU.S. Physical The…SPWR logoSPWRSunPower Inc.AFCG logoAFCGAdvanced Flower C…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+5.8%-24.3%-33.9%+14.7%-19.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+19.6%-13.8%-37.7%-35.1%+64.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+0.8%-43.5%-80.0%-18.4%+23.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-47.8%-42.6%-80.0%-39.9%+204.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-59.3%+23.1%-80.0%-41.6%+334.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+0.3%-17.3%-41.5%-6.6%+7.4%
FSLR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — USPH and FSLR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

USPH is the less volatile stock with a 1.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPWR's 2.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FSLR currently trades 76.9% from its 52-week high vs SPWR's 48.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricRMNI logoRMNIRimini Street, In…USPH logoUSPHU.S. Physical The…SPWR logoSPWRSunPower Inc.AFCG logoAFCGAdvanced Flower C…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.53x1.00x2.15x1.69x1.36x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$5.38$93.50$2.27$5.87$285.99
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.87$58.19$0.81$2.06$127.33
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+74.7%+63.4%+48.0%+54.9%+76.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10064.219.945.163.060.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded356K167K1.7M240K2.0M
Evenly matched — USPH and FSLR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — USPH and AFCG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: RMNI as "Hold", USPH as "Buy", SPWR as "Hold", FSLR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1350.5% upside for SPWR (target: $16) vs 14.5% for FSLR (target: $252). For income investors, AFCG offers the higher dividend yield at 26.96% vs USPH's 3.04%.

MetricRMNI logoRMNIRimini Street, In…USPH logoUSPHU.S. Physical The…SPWR logoSPWRSunPower Inc.AFCG logoAFCGAdvanced Flower C…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$7.17$102.00$15.81$251.82
# AnalystsCovering analysts5134573
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.0%+27.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0510
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.80$0.87
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.1%+0.6%0.0%0.0%+0.1%
Evenly matched — USPH and AFCG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FSLR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RMNI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallFirst Solar, Inc. (FSLR)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

RMNI vs USPH vs SPWR vs AFCG vs FSLR: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is RMNI or USPH or SPWR or AFCG or FSLR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) is the stronger pick with 24. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -39. 6% for Advanced Flower Capital Inc. (AFCG). Rimini Street, Inc. (RMNI) offers the better valuation at 10. 3x trailing P/E (11. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate U. S. Physical Therapy, Inc. (USPH) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — RMNI or USPH or SPWR or AFCG or FSLR?

On trailing P/E, Rimini Street, Inc.

(RMNI) is the cheapest at 10. 3x versus U. S. Physical Therapy, Inc. at 41. 8x. On forward P/E, SunPower Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First Solar, Inc. wins at 0. 40x versus Rimini Street, Inc. 's 0. 58x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — RMNI or USPH or SPWR or AFCG or FSLR?

Over the past 5 years, First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) delivered a total return of +204. 7%, compared to -80. 0% for SunPower Inc. (SPWR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FSLR returned +334. 7% versus SPWR's -80. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — RMNI or USPH or SPWR or AFCG or FSLR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), U.

S. Physical Therapy, Inc. (USPH) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 00β versus SunPower Inc. 's 2. 15β — meaning SPWR is approximately 114% more volatile than USPH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 55% for U. S. Physical Therapy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — RMNI or USPH or SPWR or AFCG or FSLR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) is pulling ahead at 24. 1% versus -39. 6% for Advanced Flower Capital Inc. (AFCG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Rimini Street, Inc. grew EPS 197. 5% year-over-year, compared to -218. 8% for Advanced Flower Capital Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SPWR leads at 65. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — RMNI or USPH or SPWR or AFCG or FSLR?

First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 3% net margin versus -66. 0% for Advanced Flower Capital Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FSLR leads at 32. 3% versus -43. 6% for AFCG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AFCG leads at 90. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is RMNI or USPH or SPWR or AFCG or FSLR more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 40x versus Rimini Street, Inc. 's 0. 58x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, SunPower Inc. (SPWR) trades at 5. 5x forward P/E versus 20. 9x for U. S. Physical Therapy, Inc. — 15. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SPWR: 1350. 5% to $15. 81.

08

Which pays a better dividend — RMNI or USPH or SPWR or AFCG or FSLR?

In this comparison, AFCG (27.

0% yield), USPH (3. 0% yield) pay a dividend. RMNI, SPWR, FSLR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is RMNI or USPH or SPWR or AFCG or FSLR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, U.

S. Physical Therapy, Inc. (USPH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 00), 3. 0% yield). SunPower Inc. (SPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (USPH: +23. 1%, SPWR: -80. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between RMNI and USPH and SPWR and AFCG and FSLR?

These companies operate in different sectors (RMNI (Technology) and USPH (Healthcare) and SPWR (Energy) and AFCG (Real Estate) and FSLR (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: RMNI is a small-cap deep-value stock; USPH is a small-cap high-growth stock; SPWR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AFCG is a small-cap income-oriented stock; FSLR is a mid-cap high-growth stock. USPH, AFCG pay a dividend while RMNI, SPWR, FSLR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

RMNI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

USPH

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SPWR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 30%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AFCG

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 20%
  • Dividend Yield > 10.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FSLR

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Net Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform RMNI and USPH and SPWR and AFCG and FSLR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(RMNI: 1.2% · USPH: 7.7%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(RMNI: 10.3x · USPH: 41.8x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.