Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

RNR vs AXS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
RNR
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.

Insurance - Reinsurance

Financial ServicesNYSE • BM
Market Cap$12.98B
5Y Perf.+79.2%
AXS
AXIS Capital Holdings Limited

Insurance - Property & Casualty

Financial ServicesNYSE • BM
Market Cap$7.32B
5Y Perf.+164.5%

RNR vs AXS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
RNR logoRNR
AXS logoAXS
IndustryInsurance - ReinsuranceInsurance - Property & Casualty
Market Cap$12.98B$7.32B
Revenue (TTM)$11.49B$6.61B
Net Income (TTM)$3.09B$1.07B
Gross Margin44.6%40.5%
Operating Margin35.5%19.6%
Forward P/E7.7x7.5x
Total Debt$2.33B$1.49B
Cash & Equiv.$1.73B$820M

RNR vs AXSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

RNR
AXS
StockMay 20May 26Return
RenaissanceRe Holdi… (RNR)100179.2+79.2%
AXIS Capital Holdin… (AXS)100264.5+164.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: RNR vs AXS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: RNR leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. AXIS Capital Holdings Limited is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
RNR
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
The Insurance Pick

RNR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 9.4%, EPS growth 60.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 36.2%
  • 176.9% 10Y total return vs AXS's 112.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta -0.03, Low D/E 12.1%, current ratio 5.03x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
AXS
AXIS Capital Holdings Limited
The Insurance Pick

AXS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 1.8%
  • Lower P/E (7.5x vs 7.7x)
  • 1.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs RNR's 0.6%
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthRNR logoRNR9.4% revenue growth vs AXS's 9.1%
ValueAXS logoAXSLower P/E (7.5x vs 7.7x)
Quality / MarginsRNR logoRNRCombined ratio 0.7 vs AXS's 0.8 (lower = better underwriting)
Stability / SafetyRNR logoRNRLower D/E ratio (12.1% vs 23.5%)
DividendsAXS logoAXS1.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs RNR's 0.6%
Momentum (1Y)RNR logoRNR+21.9% vs AXS's +1.0%
Efficiency (ROA)RNR logoRNR5.7% ROA vs AXS's 3.1%, ROIC 16.0% vs 14.8%

RNR vs AXS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

RNRRenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
FY 2025
Casualty and Specialty Segment
59.9%$5.9B
Property Segment
40.1%$4.0B
AXSAXIS Capital Holdings Limited
FY 2025
Insurance
75.1%$4.3B
Reinsurance
24.9%$1.4B

RNR vs AXS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLRNRLAGGINGAXS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

RNR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

RNR is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.5B annually — 1.7x AXS's $6.6B. RNR is the more profitable business, keeping 26.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AXS's 16.2%. On growth, AXS holds the edge at +12.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricRNR logoRNRRenaissanceRe Hol…AXS logoAXSAXIS Capital Hold…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$11.5B$6.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$4.1B$1.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$3.1B$1.1B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$4.2B$169M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+44.6%+40.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+35.5%+19.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+26.9%+16.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+36.7%+2.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-36.4%+12.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+100.9%+45.6%
RNR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

RNR leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 5.3x trailing earnings, RNR trades at a 34% valuation discount to AXS's 8.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RNR's 3.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AXS's 6.2x.

MetricRNR logoRNRRenaissanceRe Hol…AXS logoAXSAXIS Capital Hold…
Market CapShares × price$13.0B$7.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$13.6B$8.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS5.31x8.04x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.7.66x7.46x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.18x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple3.38x6.23x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.02x1.12x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.70x1.24x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF3.51x
RNR leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

RNR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

AXS delivers a 16.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $17 for RNR. RNR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AXS's 0.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RNR scores 8/9 vs AXS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricRNR logoRNRRenaissanceRe Hol…AXS logoAXSAXIS Capital Hold…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+16.6%+16.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+5.7%+3.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+16.0%+14.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+10.7%+6.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–985
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.12x0.23x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$598M$673M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1.7B$820M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2.3B$1.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense33.28x20.21x
RNR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

RNR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in RNR five years ago would be worth $18,705 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $18,643 for AXS. Over the past 12 months, RNR leads with a +21.9% total return vs AXS's +1.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AXS at 23.9% vs RNR's 13.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricRNR logoRNRRenaissanceRe Hol…AXS logoAXSAXIS Capital Hold…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+10.6%-4.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+21.9%+1.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+45.7%+90.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+87.1%+86.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+176.9%+112.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+13.4%+23.9%
RNR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

RNR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

RNR is the less volatile stock with a -0.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AXS's 0.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RNR currently trades 94.5% from its 52-week high vs AXS's 90.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricRNR logoRNRRenaissanceRe Hol…AXS logoAXSAXIS Capital Hold…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500-0.03x0.12x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$318.20$110.34
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$231.17$88.07
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+94.5%+90.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10046.946.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded303K505K
RNR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

AXS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates RNR as "Hold" and AXS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.8% upside for AXS (target: $124) vs 2.5% for RNR (target: $308). For income investors, AXS offers the higher dividend yield at 1.81% vs RNR's 0.55%.

MetricRNR logoRNRRenaissanceRe Hol…AXS logoAXSAXIS Capital Hold…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$308.33$123.88
# AnalystsCovering analysts2829
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.6%+1.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises11
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.67$1.80
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+12.3%+12.1%
AXS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

RNR leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). AXS leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook).

Best OverallRenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

RNR vs AXS: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is RNR or AXS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.

(RNR) is the stronger pick with 9. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 1% for AXIS Capital Holdings Limited (AXS). RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR) offers the better valuation at 5. 3x trailing P/E (7. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AXIS Capital Holdings Limited (AXS) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — RNR or AXS?

On trailing P/E, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.

(RNR) is the cheapest at 5. 3x versus AXIS Capital Holdings Limited at 8. 0x. On forward P/E, AXIS Capital Holdings Limited is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — RNR or AXS?

Over the past 5 years, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.

(RNR) delivered a total return of +87. 1%, compared to +86. 4% for AXIS Capital Holdings Limited (AXS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RNR returned +176. 9% versus AXS's +112. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — RNR or AXS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.

(RNR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 03β versus AXIS Capital Holdings Limited's 0. 12β — meaning AXS is approximately -472% more volatile than RNR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 23% for AXIS Capital Holdings Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — RNR or AXS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.

(RNR) is pulling ahead at 9. 4% versus 9. 1% for AXIS Capital Holdings Limited (AXS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. grew EPS 60. 8% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for AXIS Capital Holdings Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, RNR leads at 36. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — RNR or AXS?

RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.

(RNR) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 0% net margin versus 15. 4% for AXIS Capital Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 21. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RNR leads at 31. 5% versus 18. 7% for AXS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AXS leads at 49. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is RNR or AXS more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, AXIS Capital Holdings Limited (AXS) trades at 7.

5x forward P/E versus 7. 7x for RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. — 0. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AXS: 24. 8% to $123. 88.

08

Which pays a better dividend — RNR or AXS?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

AXIS Capital Holdings Limited (AXS) offers the highest yield at 1. 8%, versus 0. 6% for RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR).

09

Is RNR or AXS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.

(RNR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 03), 0. 6% yield, +176. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RNR: +176. 9%, AXS: +112. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between RNR and AXS?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

RNR

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 16%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AXS

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform RNR and AXS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(RNR: -36.4% · AXS: 12.0%)
Net Margin>
%
(RNR: 26.9% · AXS: 16.2%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(RNR: 5.3x · AXS: 8.0x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.